Posts Tagged ‘KazMunaiGas’

Andrei Plesu se intoarce azi in curtea Cotrocenilor pe usa din dos

Foreign Policy, o alta revista de-a lui Dinu Patriciu condusa de piticul lui de gradina, Andrei Plesu, se lanseaza azi intr-o conferinta la Cotroceni. Muzeul Cotroceni. Ultimul numar am inteles ca este axat pe Rusia. Alaturi de Click si Dilema lui Plesu, anul trecut trustul de presa KazMunaiGaz-Rompetrol si-a mai adjudecat si aceasta publicatie, altfel prestigioasa pe plan international. La noi insa, ca ghiuluri ruginite la mana lui Patriciu, in echipa editoriala se gasesc la gramada, adapati din galeata sa cu petro-ruble, fosti ministri de Externe si actuali demnitari cu rang inalt, cum ar fi Mihai Razvan Ungureanu, aflat totusi intr-o oarecarea incompatibilitate, ca sef al SIE si angajat al unei companii ca si rusesti. Dar, nema problema! Daca-i bal, si inca nu-i inca noiembrie, bal sa fie… Pentru azi, Patriciu a invitat in curtea Cotrocenilor, ca sa-i ia fata lui Basescu, si analisti care dupa ce au parasit culcusul cald de aici au devenit cotati ca fiind versati peste ocean. Cum ar fi Vladimir Socor. Ce te faci insa ca in chiar buletinul electronic al lui Socor, compania Gazprom, unde urmeaza sa ajunga si oficial Rompetrol, este evidentiata ca fiind interesat in monopolizarea tuturor sectoarelor strategice din Romania. Care sa fie miza, oare? O pune Patriciu de o noua “punte”?

IS GAZPROM MANEUVERING TO OBTAIN ROMANIAN ALUMINUM?

Romania’s important aluminum industry has long held an attraction for Russian companies. Two years ago their efforts came to the attention of the Romanian Intelligence Service (Serviciului Român de Informaţii), the SRI, which viewed these initiatives with growing concern.A 2006 memo from the SRI stated that Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska had made an attempt to take over the entire Romanian aluminum industry, when the state-owned aluminum enterprises Alro Slatina, Alprom Slatina and Alum Tulcea became slated for privatization by the government of Adrian Nastase.
Deripaska, however, failed to win the tenders. The Romanian aluminum companies, Alum Tulcea and Alro Slatina, were sold to the Marco group, established by the controversial commodities trader Marc Rich and later acquired by the Russian/Israeli magnate Vitaliy Machitski.The SRI memo notes that the Marco Group is controlled Conef Energy SRL, which in turn is owned by Nonef SA, also a part of the Marco Group. Conef acts as an intermediary in the purchase of gas from Gazprom. The SRI claimed that Machitsky owned 99.97 percent of Conef.
The Romanian dealings of Conef do not appear to be totally innocent. Machitsky attempted to keep his 2002 bid to buy ARLO Slatina hidden behind a web of off-shore companies he controlled. His lawyer, David Lee Sherman, explained this by saying, “It would be better to negotiate with the Romanian government through a U.S. or Israeli connection, rather than a Russian company, because of the perceived antipathy of Romanians to Russians.”
Machitsky and his former partner, Alexander Krasner, according to a 2005 transcript of the proceedings in the Queens Bench Division, a commercial court in London, conceived a plan drafted by Machitsky which they referred to by its Russian name as the “Vostok Plan,” or the “Eastern Plan.”
The “strategic objective” of the “Vostok Plan” was defined as the creation of a vertically integrated operation that would give the men power over everything from a plant producing raw materials (SC Alum SA, which Machitski’s enterprises acquired), to a power plant, to a plant producing primary products (ALRO) to a plant for manufacturing products out of the primary products (Alprom of Romania). The plan also detailed the participants and their strategy including lobbying people in positions of political influence, the head of consulting banks and the state privatization agency.
The Romanians were concerned that Machitsky had not only acquired ownership in the country’s aluminum industry but apparently controlled a substantial percentage of Romania’s gas imports from Russia.On April 2, 2007, Gazpromexport, Gazprom’s foreign trading subsidiary headed by Alexander Medvedev, signed a contract with Conef to sell Romania up to 2 billion cubic meters of gas annually from 2010 to 2030. Under the contract the aggregate supply volume would reach 42 billion cubic meters.
In April 2007 Gazprom signed long term gas supply contracts with three Romanian gas companies–Romgaz, Transgaz and Conef. The contracts provide Gazprom with long-term access to gas shipping facilities in Romania. At this time Gazprom also agreed to increase gas deliveries to the Alro Slatina aluminum plant owned by Machitski’s Marco Group. The price Gazprom charged Conef for this gas was classified a “commercial secret.
“Since becoming President of Romania in May 2007, Traian Basescu has issued several warnings about the Russian expansion into Romania. His main target has been Gazprom: “Gazprom is more efficient than the Red Army in making Europe dependant on Russian resources,” Basescu stated last year.
Basescu has often indicated his support for energy projects that bypass Russia, pointing to reports from analysts that European gas imports will grow from the present 525 billion cubic meters (bcm) to 740 bcm by 2030. However, recent estimates indicate that the EU has taken significant steps toward diversifying its gas supplies, and Norway is now poised to become the EU’s largest provider of gas. This, along with rising LNG imports from North Africa and growing Russian domestic consumption, might negate Gazprom’s dreams of controlling the European gas market.The Romanian gas market could well feel a financial impact from this development. First and foremost it stands to lose millions of dollars in transit fees for Russian gas transiting its territory to Greece and Turkey.
Machitsky’s Conef, on the other hand, seems poised to take advantage of the allegedly sweetheart deal it struck with Gazprom and will be able to produce aluminum below the costs of other European manufacturers in the coming years.
The question that remains unanswered is why did Gazpromexport agree to this separate deal? Is there a backroom agreement between Gazprom management that Conef will sell them the Romanian aluminum business in the near future?
Can the Romanian government prevent such a maneuver?

(“Evenimentul Zilei,” January 26, 2007; www.hotnews.ro, April 14; Krasner v. Machitski and others Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court) [2005] EWHC 1787; Kommersant; RIA Novosti, Central Europe Digest).
Roman Kupchinsky
Roman Kupchinsky is an organized crime and terrorism analyst
He can be contacted at [email protected]

Acord Gazprom – KasMunaiGas anti-Nabucco

Un acord intre Gazprom si furnizorii de gaze din Asia Centrala da o noua lovitura Nabucco
MOSCOVA, 13 mar (MEDIAFAX) – Gazprom, KazMunaiGas, Uzbekneft si Turkmengaz au convenit, in aceasta saptamana, ca, din 2009, pretul platit de grupul rus pentru gazele cumparate din Asia Centrala sa fie la nivelul celor europene, iar acordul, care evoca imaginea unui OPEC al gazelor, ar putea fi o lovitura de gratie data Nabucco.Detaliile acordului, respectiv formula de stabilire a pretului gazelor, urmeaza sa fie stabilite in urma unor negocieri, relateaza agentia RIA Novosti.Pretul ar putea fi de 200-230 de dolari pentru o mie de metri cubi de gaze, in functie de locul unde va avea loc transferul catre Gazprom. n cazul Slovaciei si Romaniei, pretul este de circa 330 de dolari pentru o mie de metri cubi.La inceputul anului, analistii anticipau ca pretul platit de consumatorii europeni pentru gaze va ajunge in 2009 la 360 de dolari pentru o mie de metri cubi, dar estimarea a fost revizuita semnificativ, la 380 de dolari pentru 2008, fiind posibil sa ajunga chiar la 400 de dolari pana la sfarsitul acestui an.Numerosi analisti au avertizat ca pretul ar putea fi si mai mare, avand in vedere avansul rapid al cotatiei petrolului.Decizia Gazprom de a accepta termenii producatorilor din Asia Centrala va da lovitura de gratie proiectului de constructie a gazoductului Nabucco, promovat de Statele Unite si Uniunea Europeana, care ar urma sa transporte gaze turkmene catre Europa, tranzitand Azerbaijanul, Turcia si regiunea balcanica, se mai arata in articol.Furnizorii din Asia Centrala pot fi inlocuiti numai de Iran, solutie care nu ar fi corecta din punct de vedere politic, avand in vedere conflictul autoritatilor iraniene cu statele occidentale pe tema activitatilor de imbogatire a uraniului.Nabucco, a carui constructie va costa circa cinci miliarde de euro, va avea o capacitate anuala de transport de 30 de miliarde de metri cubi de gaze.Aducerea preturilor la nivel european va consolida proiectul Rusiei si al producatorilor din regiune pentru construirea unui gazoduct propriu in zona caspica.Prelungirea unei conducte deja existente va suplimenta livrarile turkmene si kazace de gaze cu cate zece miliarde de metri cubi si demonstreaza, in opinia analistilor, cooperarea mai stransa dintre producatorii de gaze ex-sovietici.Schimbarile evoca crearea unui cartel similar Organizatiei Statelor Exportatoare de Petrol, in special in contextul in care anuntul celor patru companii a fost facut cu asentimentul Kremlinului, potrivit presei.Rusia promoveaza de mult timp formarea unei asociatii a producatorilor de gaze din fosta Uniune Sovietica, dupa modelul OPEC, iar adoptarea unui pret european al gazelor va contribui la imbunatatirea cooperarii intre acestia.Astfel, in pofida eforturilor consumatorilor occidentali de gaze, cele patru state din Comunitatea Statelor Independente au adoptat o strategie comuna pe pietele externe.n contextul actual, Ucraina se prezinta drept victima principala.Gazprom cumpara, anual, circa 42 de miliarde de metri cubi de gaze din Turkmenistan si alte opt miliarde de metri cubi atat din Uzbekistan, cat si din Kazahstan. n acest an, pretul platit de Gazprom acestor state a fost de 140, 145, respectiv 160 de dolari pentru o mie de metri cubi de gaze.n prezent, cea mai mare parte a acestor gaze sunt livrate Ucrainei, pentru 179,5 dolari petnru o mie de metri cubi, pret acceptabil pentru partea ucraineana si usor profitabil pentru Gazprom.Majorarea pretului platit producatorilor din Asia Centrala nu va mai permite Ucrainei sa cumpere gaze ieftine. n fata acestei probleme, autoritatile de la Kiev ar putea incerca sa rezolve o parte a problemei pe cheltuiala Gazprom.Ucraina aplica tarife de tranzit pentru gazele rusesti destinate Europei care ii tranziteaza teritoriul si nu ar fi o surpriza daca guvernul condus de Iulia Timosenko va majora acest cost pentru a compensa majorarea pretului gazelor din Asia Centrala.n acest caz, Gazprom va fi nevoit sa suporte costuri de pana la 1,5 miliarde de dolari pentru profiturile mai mari ale partenerilor din Asia Centrala.Gazprom face insa tot ce este posibil pentru a evita revizuirea radicala a tarifelor de tranzit. Totodata, Gazprom poate majora tariful aplicat tranzitului gazelor din Asia Centrala pe teritorul propriu.Formula de calcul al preturilor si al tarifelor de tranzit nu a fost stabilita, dar noile preturi vor favoriza noi discutii privind accesul Gazprom la piata interna a Ucrainei, precum si dezbaterile referitoare la consumul de gaze la nivel international.(Anca Dumitrescu, [email protected])

Powered by WordPress

toateBlogurile.ro

customizable counter
Blog din Moldova