Posts Tagged ‘biometrie’

Paradoxal, Uniunea Europeana ne da dreptate: argumente de drept international impotriva cipului biometric, implantat sau inserat in acte de identitate

January 26th, 2009 VR 1 Comment »

Un document descoperit de colegul meu, George Damian, de la ZIUA si Centrul de Studii pentru Resurse Romanesti, publicat acum, aici, in premiera in Romania, ne ofera argumente juridice si medicale impotriva folosirii cipului biometric implantat dar si a celui inserat in cadrul documentelor de identitate, pentru ca principiile privind drepturile fundamentale ale omului raman aceleasi.
Studiul, chiar daca dateaza din 2005 (cu atat mai mult) trebuie sa intre in atentia Coalitiei Impotriva Statului Politienesc, a domnului doctor Pavel Chirila si a avocatilor nostri dar si a ierarhilor Bisericii care, inca, nu s-au pronuntat.
Iata ca cei care sugerau ca trebuie sa ne conformam cerintelor UE nu au dreptate. Acestea nu sunt, inca, definite. Inca nu avem de a face cu Uniunea Sovietelor Socialiste Europene.

OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN GROUP ON ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
N° 20 Adopted on 16/03/2005
Original in English
******************************************************************************************************************

ETHICAL ASPECTS OF ICT IMPLANTS IN THE HUMAN BODY
Reference: Opinion produced on the direct initiative of the EGE
Rapporteurs: Professor Stefano Rodotà and Professor Rafael Capurro
******************************************************************************************************************
The European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (EGE),
Having regard to the European Union Treaty and in particular Article 6 of the common provisions concerning the respect for fundamental rights;
Having regard to the EC Treaty and in particular Article 152 on public health;
Having regard to the Charter of Fundamental rights of the European Union of 28 September 2000, approved by the European Council in Biarritz on 14th October 2000 and proclaimed solemnly in Nice by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on December 7th 2000, in particular Article 1 on « Human dignity », Article 3 on the « Right to the integrity of the person », and Article 8 on « Protection of personal data »; 1
Having regard to Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector; 2
Having regard to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data; 3
Having regard to the Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices; 4
Having regard to the Council of Europe Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, signed on 4 April 1997 in Oviedo; in particular Article 1 “Purpose and object”, Article 2 “Primacy of the human being”, Articles 5 to 9 on consent and Article 10 “Private life and right to information”; 5
Having regard to the Universal Declaration on the human genome and the rights of man adopted by the UNESCO on 11 November 1997; 6
Having regard to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data of the Council of Europe of 1 January 1981; 7
Having regard to the Declaration of Principles of the World Summit on the Information Society of 12 December 2003, in particular Article 58 on the use of ICTs and Article 59 on the abusive uses of ICTs; 8
Having regard to the hearings of experts and Commission Services by the EGE on 15/12/2003, 16/03/2004 and 15/06/2004 in Brussels;
Having regard to the report by Dr Fabienne Nsanze “ICT implants in the human body – A Review”, February 2005; 9
Having regard to the Roundtable organised by the EGE on 21st December 2004 in Amsterdam; 10
Having heard the EGE rapporteurs, Professor Stefano Rodotà and Professor Rafael Capurro;
WHEREAS:
1. INTRODUCTION
Information and communication technologies (ICT) pervade our lives. Thus far, this pervasive influence has mainly involved devices that we use for private purposes or at the work place such as personal computers, mobile phones, laptops and the like. Due to new developments these devices are becoming more and more part of our bodies, either because we wear them (wearable computing) or because they are implanted in our bodies.
At first sight ICT implants are ethically unproblematic if we think for instance about cardiac pacemakers. However, although ICT implants may be used to repair deficient bodily capabilities they can also be misused, particularly if these devices are accessible via digital networks. One might even think of such devices as a threat to human dignity and particularly to the integrity of the human body (see Section 5), while for others such implants might be seen primarily as a means for restoring damaged human capabilities and therefore as a contribution to the promotion of human dignity.
The idea of letting ICT devices get under our skin in order not just to repair but even to enhance human capabilities gives rise to science fiction visions with threat and/or benefit characteristics. However, in some cases, the implantation of microchips is already taking place with the potential for individual and social forms of control.
The intimate relation between bodily and psychic functions is basic to our personal identity. Modern neurosciences are emphasising this view. Language and imagination influence in a unique way our perception of time and space; the way we perceive ourselves and others; the way we relate to other non-human living beings and to the natural environment; the way we create historically, culturally, politically, legally, economically, and technically our societies; the way we acquire knowledge about ourselves and about the world; and the way we produce, create, and exchange things.
ICT devices are the products of human invention. The functions they achieve are based on programmable or algorithmic calculations mostly using non-biological substances such as silicon. This allows a simulation of some biological and psychic functions11. Furthermore, it is in principle, and today also in practice, possible to implant ICT devices in the human body in order
to restore bodily functions or, as in the case of prostheses and artificial limbs, to substitute some body parts.
These are the essential reasons why potential and actual ICT implants in the human body have large and important ethical consequences.
Consequently, the objective of this Opinion is primarily to raise awareness and questions concerning the ethical dilemmas created by a range of ICT implants in this rapidly expanding field. Ethical awareness and analysis must take place now in order to ensure an appropriate and timely impact on the various technological applications. Nevertheless, where necessary this Opinion proposes clear ethical boundaries, legal principles and suggests several steps that should be taken by responsible regulators in Europe. The Opinion focuses on ICT implants in the human body (see Section 6.1).
2. GLOSSARY
ICT devices: Devices using information and communication technologies usually based on silicon chip technology.
Active medical device: Any medical device relying for its functioning on an internal and independent source of electrical energy or any source of power other than that directly generated by the human body or gravity.12
Active implantable medical device: Any active medical device which is intended to be totally or partially introduced surgically or medically, into the human body or by medical intervention into a natural orifice, and which is intended to remain after the procedure.13
Passive ICT implants: ICT implants in the human body that rely on an external electromagnetic field for their operation (see for example Section 3.1.1 the “Verichip”).
Online ICT implants: ICT implants that rely for their operation on an (“online”) connection to an external computer or which can be interrogated (“online”) by an external computer (see for example Section 3.1.2 Biosensors).
Offline ICT implants: ICT implants that operate independently of external ICT devices (perhaps after an initial setting up operation) (see for example Section 3.1.1 Deep Brain Stimulation).
3. SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL BACKGROUND
(See detailed report by Dr Fabienne Nsanze “ICT implants in the human body – a review” of February 2005 – annexed to this Opinion)
3.1. Current Applications and Research
3.1.1. Applications: ICT implants on the market
This section contains information about implants in the human body that are available in commercial form and have been researched, in some cases, for decades.
Active medical devices
The history of implantable devices in clinical practice started in the 1960s with the development of the first heart pacemakers to replace the autonomic rhythm of the heart. Systems for bladder stimulation that allow paraplegics (paralysis of the lower limbs often resulting from spinal cord injuries) to control voiding followed in the 1980s. The most recent examples of active implants for functional electrical stimulation are stimulators to treat pain in patients with tumours and trembling caused by Parkinson’s disease, and to restore the grasp function in quadriplegics (paralysis of the arms, legs and trunk below the level of an associated spinal cord injury). Typical devices include the following:
• Cardiovascular pacers for patients with conduction disorders or heart failure
• Cochlear implants: the cochlear implant differs from the hearing aid in that it does not amplify sound and bypasses the damaged part to send sound signals directly to the auditory nerve.
• Auditory Brainstem implant (ABI) is an auditory prosthesis that bypasses the cochlea and auditory nerve to help individuals who cannot benefit from a cochlear implant because the auditory nerves are not working. The brainstem implant stimulates directly the cochlear nucleus situated in the brainstem.
• Implantable programmable drug delivery pumps:

Posted in Uncategorized Tags: , , , 1 Comment »

TIME: Biocipurile – de la cancer la afacere

January 25th, 2009 VR No Comments »

Are Microchip Tags Safe?
By Siobhan Morrissey

Un articol aparut in TIME, in 18 octombrie 2007, dar care contine date foarte interesante.

Foto: Tiny radio frequency identification (RFID) computer chips with the needles used to implant them under the skin.

You may not know what RFID stands for, but you’re probably using the technology on a daily basis. RFID (that is, radio frequency identification) is in passports, in electronic toll-collection tags, in credit cards, metrocards, library books and car keys. Like conventional bar codes, RFID chips store and relay information, and allow for the identification of commercial products — and, now, of house pets and people too. Human “tagging” was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2004 to facilitate retrieval of private medical records, but the procedure has had few takers. It’s still purely voluntary and last week, California Gov. Schwarzenegger sought to keep it that way, signing a bill that makes it illegal for employers to force workers to have RFID devices implanted as a means for receiving paychecks or government benefits.
But this summer, a large pilot program involving hundreds of human patients got under way at the Alzheimer’s Community Care agency in West Palm Beach, Florida. The maker of the RFID chips used in the program, VeriChip Corporation, a subsidiary of the Delray Beach–based Applied Digital Solutions, is funding the initiative and wants to market its tags to the roughly 45 million high-risk patients in the U.S. with diseases such as Alzheimer’s, diabetes, cancer and heart disease. The company says these patients can benefit from having instant and accurate access to medical records, which the chip would provide. “The medical community understands the need for a comprehensive electronic medical record that has portability,” says VeriChip Chairman and CEO Scott Silverman. “What goes on in emergency rooms and even in practices today is archaic. Pen-and-paper record keeping is 97% of medical records today; 98,000 deaths occurred last year in emergency rooms because of no information or inaccurate information.”
To date 2,000 people worldwide have voluntarily had the VeriChip tag implanted into their upper right arms, among them patients with chronic or debilitating disease — as well as VIP patrons of a Barcelona nightclub and investigators requiring special access to confidential drug-trafficking case files at the Ministry of Justice in Mexico. Over the next two years, VeriChip and Alzheimer’s Community Care plans to inject 110 patients with dementia or Alzheimer’s with the chip as well. But VeriChip came under fire in September — shortly after the first 90 or so Alzheimer’s patients received its chips in Florida — after an AP report unearthed studies suggesting the chips may cause cancer in laboratory animals. Within two weeks of the AP report, VeriChip’s stock plummeted from just under $6 a share to a low of $3.50, a company spokesman says.
The AP cited three studies published between 1996 and 2006 that “found that lab mice and rats injected with microchips sometimes developed subcutaneous sarcomas — malignant tumors, most of them encasing the implants.”
In an exclusive interview with TIME, Silverman provided a list of 34 studies the company included in its FDA application, including one of the three mentioned in the AP article, which showed that less than 1% of 4,279 chipped mice developed tumors “clearly due to the implanted microchips” but were otherwise healthy, and that “no clinical symptoms except the nodule on their backs were shown.” The second study, conducted in France in 2006, two years after VeriChip’s FDA application was approved, found that while 4% of the 1,260 mice in the study developed tumors, none of them were malignant. As for the third study, Silverman says it was conducted in mice specifically bred to produce tumors, and was therefore omitted from the sheaf of studies included in the FDA application. Other studies that were sent to the regulatory agency also showed tumor growth, but associated only with vaccination sites.
Dr. Lawrence D. McGill, a veterinarian and leading expert in animal pathology says the tumor development in rodents is unsurprising. “Even if you put in a bland piece of plastic, it will produce tumors in rats and mice,” says McGill, who assessed the studies on behalf of VeriChip. He says it would be a leap to apply the findings of studies in mice to cats or dogs — or to humans, for that matter — which are much more complex animals. Few official scientific studies have been conducted on the effects of microchip implants on house pets, but none have found a link between the chips and cancer, says McGill. If there were a problem, he says, we would have already seen lots of cancer among the approximately 10 million pets that have been chipped over the past 15 years. Says Silverman, “There are no reported incidents to the FDA of any cancer formation around that.”
In fact, there has been one case of cancer — in a French bulldog named Leon — according to a 2006 study in Veterinary Pathology. But it remains unclear whether the cancer was caused by a microchip or as the result of an injection, or who the maker of the chip was. The dog’s tumor was removed in 2004, and a later examination found no recurrence. It seems that no one notified the FDA about Leon, but his case doesn’t appear to worry the agency, as evident from a statement it issued when the AP brought Leon’s story to light in September. “At this time, we continue to believe that the VeriChip is safe for humans,” the FDA said. “In all the safety data the FDA has reviewed for this device, including extensive animal data, we have seen no evidence suggesting toxic or carcinogenic effects.”
News of the tumor studies haven’t yet dissuaded other groups, including Alzheimer’s Community Care and the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), from encouraging the use of RFID microchips. Given the large number of Alzheimer’s patients in South Florida and the potential for natural disasters such as hurricanes and floods, the VeriChip comes in handy, says Mary Barnes, president and CEO of Alzheimer’s Community Care, because, unlike a medical medallion, it cannot be taken off or lost. “In Palm Beach County and South Florida, we have projected over 200,000 Alzheimer’s patients,” Barnes says. “When you’ve got that kind of risk out there for our family members … this type of technology is a godsend.”
Over the next two years, Barnes will monitor how often medical records change for each of the patients in her agency’s RFID program, and will track how the caregivers work with the new technology. “You don’t have to be a brain surgeon to figure out this has great possibilities,” she says.
Meanwhile, a handful of concerned pet owners have expressed interest in removing RFID chips from their furry companions, but VeriChip hasn’t heard of anyone doing so yet. The AVMA officially counsels against removing the chip, while assuring pet owners it will continue to monitor the situation. “At this point we do not recommend that people should stop microchipping,” says Dr. Rosemary LoGiudice, a veterinarian and assistant director with the AVMA. “We are actively watching. For the number of animals that are said to actually have microchips, when you consider the number of animals that have been microchipped and returned to their owners, the benefits are huge compared to the few and suspect cases that have been reported to have tumor formation.”
At VeriChip, the outlook remains hopeful. Silverman says his company is bracing for the negative press by gathering up studies that prove the safety of its product. Even though the public hasn’t yet warmed to RFID tagging, Silverman says that sales are brisk and expects this year to double the 1.7 million chips sold in 2006.

Posted in Uncategorized Tags: , , , , , No Comments »

Profetia Apocalipsei. Dupa cipul RFID implantabil in umar urmeaza cipul MMEA implantabil pe frunte

January 24th, 2009 VR No Comments »


“Şi ea îi sileşte pe toţi, pe cei mici şi pe cei mari, şi pe cei bogaţi şi pe cei săraci, şi pe cei slobozi şi pe cei robi, ca să-şi pună semn pe mâna lor cea dreaptă sau pe frunte.
Încât nimeni să nu poată cumpăra sau vinde, decât numai cel ce are semnul, adică numele fiarei, sau numărul numelui fiarei.”

In ultimii ani s-a constata o accelerare a eforturilor de popularizare a bio-cipului implantabil realizat de Corporatia VeriChip, condusa de un Board de Directori format din Jeffrey Cobb, Barry M Edelstein, Steven R Foland, Scott Silverman si Michael Krawitz. Produsul a devenit o realitatea pe piata americana inca din 2004, cand US Food and Drug Administration – Departamentul american pentru Alimentatie si Medicamente (FDA) a aprobat folosirea bio-cipului ca sistem implantabil care contine tehnologie de identificare prin radio frecventa (prescurtat RFID). Conform prevederilor companiei producatoare, VeriChip, bio-cipul mai mic decat un bob de orez contine o baza de date si un numar de identificare unic si se implanteaza in mana dreapta.

VeriChip Corporation (https://www.verichipcorp.com/), producatorul micro-cipurilor, le face reclama drept cel mai sigur si rapid mod de a accesa informatii medicale de la o persoana, in situatii de urgenta. Dupa cum probabil stiti, Statele Unite au inceput deja sa implanteze aceste bio-cipuri voluntarilor dar si copiilor, bolnavilor, detinutilor si militarilor. Discutia principala din spatiul public american si nu numai, este, in acest moment, inlocuirea cartilor de identitate, in timp, cu aceste bio-cipuri implantate in mana dreapta.

Inca sunt voci, izolate, care reclama, ca si noi acum, faptul ca tehnica permite interceptarea informatiilor, ca avem de a face cu insemnarea cu numarul Fiarei, ca este un atac la libertatea persoanei, etc, etc. Acum, razboiul impotriva terorismului cumulat cu “salvarea mondiala” de criza ce se amplifica, la randul ei indusa, justifica orice masura excesiva. America trebuie perceputa ca un experiment. “Experimentul Pitesti” a fost aplicat, cu succes, intr-o alta forma, neviolenta dar cu acelasi scop si la scara larga, precum comunismul, asupra amestecului de populatii din Statele Unite. Rezistenta este asadar minima si anihilabila. Probabil mai auziti din cand in cand de cate un grup de credinciosi – catalogati rapid de media drept extremisti – care se refugiaza in munti si refuza orice legatura cu statul federal, pentru ca apoi sa aflam ca o razie FBI a reusit sa “repuna situatie in legalitate”, cu ajutorul uzului excesiv al armelor de foc.

Pana la faza aceasta, aici, in spatiul european, inca pregatit la o rezistenta in masa datorita crestinismului si a culturii milenare a natiunilor bine inradacinate in arealul lor ancestral, se opereaza cu acest instrument intemediar, actul de identitate cu micro-cip. Dupa cum intemeiat a avertizat Duhovnicul Neamului, Parintele Iustin Parvu, in urma revelatiei sale, acesta este un semn premergator insemnarii fizice cu numarul Fiarei, conform profetiei Apocalipsei, pe mana dreapta si pe frunte. Si iata dovada tehnica, cunoscuta deja la nivelul expertilor: conform unor surse independente de presa, deci neoccidentale, focalizarea discutiei publice asupra VeriChip pune in umbra faza a doua a operatiunii malefice. Conform acestor surse, la ora aceasta s-a edificat deja cel de-al doilea proiect ultra-sofisticat, sub comanda Agentiei de Cercetari si Proiecte Avansate de Aparare (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency – DARPA) care apartine de Departamentul Apararii Statelor Unite. DARPA (https://www.darpa.mil/) este, printre multe altele, si inventatoarea Internetului.

Inventia care ar putea implini Profetia este un alt micro-cip implantabil, numit Multiple Micro Electrode Array – MMEA (Vezi Multielectrode array si Biochip). Acest cip va fi implantat in cap, in zona fruntii, pe un nerv care va conecta creierul direct la un calculator. Inventia este deja testata cu succes si are diferite aplicatii, in special, momentan, medicale si militare. Concret, aceasta va permite practic teleghidarea unui om de la distanta. Experimentele (publice) de pana acum au demonstrat cum un cobai devine o jucarie vie in mainile specialistilor care detin telecomanda. Sigur, totul pare de SF. Dar la fel era pentru stramosii nostri posibilitatea zborului in spatiu. Acum totul este normal, asa cum va parea, poate, si urmasilor nostri folosirea acestor micro-bio-cipuri, pentru “beneficiile” aduse de acestea in “situatii de urgenta”.

De aici, nu va mai fi decat un pas, pentru americani, pana la implinirea Profetiei, doi, probabil, pentru romani. Poate dura 10, 20 sau 30 de ani, poate dura mai mult – in functie de gradul de “civilizatie” al zonei -, dar in tot cazul, suntem foarte aproape. “Nu credeam că voi trăi să văd şi eu începutul acestor vremuri de durere, apocaliptice”, afirma Parintele Justin in Apelul sau la trezire. Un clevetitor infiltrat in Biserica noastra, fragmentata deja, in cea oficiala si cea reala, se intreba cu glas tare de ce trebuie sa mai respectam niste canoane “invechite”, in cazul scandalului apostaziei lui Corneanu. Acum, pentru a fi luat in deradere demersul de avertizare profetica venit din partea Parintelui Justin Parvu, se spune acelasi lucru despre scrierea sfanta a Apocalipsei. Si totusi, ea se intampla.

Posted in Uncategorized Tags: , , , , , , No Comments »

Spuneti NU IAD-ului! Insemnarea electronica a natiunii trebuie sa aiba consimtamantul ei. Dezbatere contra stantarii biometrice prin cipuri invizibile

January 11th, 2009 VR 19 Comments »

Primii din lume la Pasapoarte cu toate datele biometrice, incepand din acest an
Fila informatizata a noilor documente de calatorie contine un cip electronic invizibil

UPDATE mai sus:
Documentar VIDEO: noul MICROCIP uman implantabil 666 si urmarile acestuia
ACTIUNE:
Crestini, organizati-va! Formular de respingere a insemnarii electronice cu 666

Fara a fi consultati si fara a aproba acest lucru, romanii vor avea pasapoarte cu date biometrice incorporate incepand din acest an. Oficial, prin date biometrice se intelege, intr-o prima faza, introducerea in fila informatizata a pasaportului a unui “cip electronic invizibil” care va contine aceeasi fotografie care exista pe fila respectiva, insa in format electronic. Este vorba despre o fotografie color cu dimensiunile 35mm/45mm continand imaginea faciala a persoanei privita din fata, cu capul descoperit si ochii deschisi. Ministerul de Interne a informat ca Uniunea Europeana adauga cel putin o masura suplimentara de identificare. Aceasta consta in incorporarea in cipul electronic aflat in pagina informatizata a documentului, alaturi de imaginea faciala, si a impresiunilor digitale ale degetelor de la fiecare mana. Agentia de presa Mediafax ne informeaza ca, noul ministru de Interne, Gabriel Oprea, nici nu si-a preluat bine functia si a si vizitat, la sfarsitul anului trecut, Centrul Naţional Unic de Personalizare a Paşapoartelor Electronice, unde începând cu 1 ianuarie 2009 se produc noile tipuri de paşapoarte, care conţin 50 de elemente de siguranţă, faţă de 32 existente pe actualele documente.
“Elementul de noutate” al paşaportului biometric este introducerea unui cip care include datele personale ale deţinătorului. “Noile paşapoarte sunt dovadă a faptului că România îşi poate îndeplini responsabilităţile pe care le are că ţară membră a Uniunii Europene. Introducerea unor elemente suplimentare de siguranţă şi, bineînţeles, controlul strict la graniţe au rolul de a împiedica exportul şi importul de infracţionalitate”, sustine ministrul Administraţiei şi Internelor. Începând cu 31 decembrie 2008, România, că stat membru UE, poate emite paşapoarte electronice în conformitate cu Regulamentul nr. 2252/2004 al Consiliului Europei, privind standardele pentru elementele de securitate şi elementele biometrice integrate în paşapoarte şi în documente de călătorie emise de statele membre. Conform Ordonanţei de Urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 94/2008 pentru stabilirea unor măsuri privind punerea în circulaţie a paşapoartelor electronice, precum şi producerea altor documente de călătorie, personalizarea paşapoartelor electronice se realizează de către Centrul Naţional Unic de Personalizare a Paşapoartelor Electronice, care functionează în structura Direcţiei Generale de Paşapoarte a M.A.I. Conform aceluiaşi act normativ, producerea blanchetelor (paşapoarte în alb) se realizează de către Compania Natională “Imprimeria Natională”.
Potrivit sursei citate, România este singurul stat din lume care emite un model de paşaport electronic care cuprinde, chiar de la momentul introducerii, ambele elemente de identificare, respectiv imaginea facială şi impresiunile digitale, conchide Mediafax.

Numarul 2, dupa SUA, la amenintari teroriste?

Nu este foarte clar de ce noi suntem primii in toate, cum am fost si cu noile note bancare de plastic ale Leului, desi, teoretic – si tot fara consultanta populara – vom trece in curand la moneda europeana Euro.
Nu este foarte clar care este motivul acestei cheltuieli imense, in conditiile “crizei internationale”, starii de subsiztenta a pensionarilor si a unei sub-salarizari a profesorilor, de exemplu.
In Statele Unite, presedintele George Bush invoca anul trecut, in Decretul sau de instituire a Biometriei informatizate, “Securitatea Nationala”, la punctul 1, ca motivul principal al actului este “protejarea natiunii impotriva ‘teroristilor cunoscuti si suspectati’ (‘known and suspected terrorists’ – KSTs – Vezi White House: National Security Presidential Directive and Homeland Security … – [ Tradu această pagină ] SUBJECT: Biometrics for Identification and Screening to Enhance National Security). Daca in cazul american ratiunea este, cel putin oficial, o masura “anti-terorista”, care sa fie la noi motivul: suntem o natiune de teroristi sau, dupa SUA, suntem a doua tara din lume ca risc al unei amenintari teroriste iminente?
Nu este foarte clar nici de ce nimeni, dar nimeni din Guvern, nu s-a gandit sa supuna aceasta tema dezbaterii publice, conform normelor de scena ale asa-zisei democratii la care suntem si noi niste figuranti, acolo. Chiar atat de mare este pericolul si nu stim noi? Sau insemnarea noastra, ca pe vite, este primul pas al unor alte masuri luate pentru controlul absolut al fiintei umane?

Ceea ce este clar este faptul ca noua reglementare incalca dreptul la intimitate si propria persoana, la viata si la libertate si, mai mult decat atat, incalca convingerile religioase ale peste 87% din natiune ( Vezi https://www.razboiulnevazut.org/articol/51/Scrisoarea-Parintelui-Paisie-Aghioratul-referitoare-la-semnele-vremurilor-666.) Orice cetatean trebuie sa aiba dreptul la alegere, atunci cand i se pune viata intr-un cip – updatat la voia autoritatilor -, atunci cand este transformat intr-un simplu numar, mai ceva ca in statul comunist sau nazist.

Sa invatam de la sarbi: “Viata fara a fi insemnat”,

In statul vecin ortodox, Serbia, in urma unei campanii pornite de o simpla organizatie de crestini, introducerea cipurilor biometrice a fost blocata. Biserica Ortodoxa Sarba a organizat o conferinta stiintifica, la care au participat experti in IT, profesori universitari si personalitati culturale, care au solicitat Guvernului, printr-un apel public, oprirea stantarii electronice a oamenilor pana la o dezbatere nationala pe aceasta tema. Dupa doi ani de lupte, si sprijin din partea comunitatii academice si bisericestu, victoria credinciosilor ortodocsi asupra autoritatilor a facut ca biometrizarea cu fierul rosu a sarbilor sa fie respinsa. Vezi Serbia rejects biometric ID cards EDRI. Bineinteles, asociatia care a reusita aceasta performanta, “Dveri” – Porti (https://www.dverisrpske.com/), nascuta in 1999la Facultatea de Filologia a Universitatii din Belgrad, a fost catalogata imediat de “prietenii” Serbiei (aceiasi cu cei ai Romaniei) drept fundamentalist-extremista si anti-mondializare, ca si cum globalizarea ar fi un lucru bun. Avocatul Dragoljub Djordjevic, promotorul campaniei anti-biometrie “Viata fara a fi insemnat”, a mers mai departe, in 2008, contestand Legea abuziva la Curtea Suprema a Serbiei. Ceea ce trebuie sa facem si noi.

Studiind materialele accesibile pe Internet despre biometrie am dat si dun institut al carui nume spune tot, pentru romani: Information Acces Division, pe scurt IAD

Infiorati-va aici:
https://www.biometrics.gov/
https://www.biometrics.org/

Vedeti mai jos o demonstratie despre cum va arata fisa dvs electronica 666 pe camerele de supraveghere si doua documentare explicative privind controlul populatiei prin biometrie

DOCUMENTARE
https://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=279260406068094333&hl=en
https://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-2029681589148358971&hl=en
Cu subtitrarea in romana

Posted in Uncategorized Tags: , , , 19 Comments »
Newer Entries »
Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More
RSS FeedAbonare RSS
Roncea.ro pe TwitterRoncea.ro pe Twitter

  • Featured Video

  • Ads

Powered by WordPress

toateBlogurile.ro

customizable counter
Blog din Moldova