Barack Obama nu este interesat de zona Mării Negre. Declaraţia a fost făcută de fostul ambasador al Statelor Unite în România, Alfred Moses. Diplomatul mai crede că relaţiile dintre România şi SUA nu vor mai fi la fel de apropiate ca în perioada administraţiei Bush. Fostul ambasador al Statelor Unite în România, Alfred Moses (foto stanga-dreapta), susţine că zona Mării Negre nu va fi o prioritate a administraţiei Obama. El susţine că spre deosebire de George W. Bush, din echipa lui Obama nu va face parte niciun specialist în această zonă. “Europa nu va fi în atenţia sa în mod special. Administraţia Obama se va concentra pe Orientul Mijlociu, pe Iran, pe Afganistan, pe China. (…) Zona Mării Negre nu va fi însă o prioritate a administraţiei Obama. Din cunoştinţele mele, Barack Obama nu a fost niciodată în vizită în estul Europei”, a declarat Moses. Diplomatul american crede că relaţiile dintre România şi Statele Unite se vor schimba în timpul administraţiei Obama: “Nu cred că Obama va avea aceleaşi sentimente faţă de România. Relaţiile dintre România şi SUA nu vor fi la fel de calde şi de apropiate ca în cazul administraţiei Bush. (…) Preşedintele Bush a avut o relaţie specială cu Europa de Est şi cu România în mod special, pentru că ţara dumneavoastră a sprijinit politica americană în Irak, în Afganistan.”. Cu toate acestea, Alfred Moses susţine că România este în continuare bine văzută în Statele Unite atât de democraţi cât şi de republicani. Antena 3 / 9 noiembrie 2008 Alfred Moses, supranumit tatuka lui Mircea Geoana, presedinte de onoare al Comitetului Evreiesc American si donator al democratilor sprijina, dupa cum se vede din editorialul sau de mai jos, o relatie profunda intre Obama si Israel. Alti democrati contesta sinceritatea lui Obama, si sustin, la https://www.stop-obama.org/?p=77, ca noul presedinte ales al Americii minte. La fel, ramane de vazut… In tot cazul, la prima sa aparitie publica dupa alegeri, Obama a avut o declaratie in favoarea Israelului vizavi de dreptul Iranului de a-si dezvolta programul nuclear civil.
Barack Obama Is A Friend of Israel
By Alfred Moses Despite the ringing endorsement of Senator Barack Obama by Jewish colleagues in the Congress and ardent Jewish supporters in his home state of Illinois, the rumor mill does not stop churning out the spurious accusation that the presidential candidate is no friend of Israel (“Internal Memo Takes On Obama’s Mideast Approach,” January 23). The character assassins could not care less about accuracy; their aim is to sow doubt through insidious appeals to voters’ sensitivities — and for Jews, this means Israel. Last month, an internal memorandum written by a staffer at the American Jewish Committee, of which I am honorary president, was leaked to the Forward. The memorandum claims that Obama had called on Israel “to take risks for peace.” If true — and the staffer did not cite sources — these are the exact words used by President Bush when he visited Israel last month. They are also the same words repeated by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert before, during and since Bush’s visit. The staffer’s allegation that Obama has changed course in his views on Iran are equally vacuous. Listen to his words: “The world must work to stop Iran’s uranium enrichment program and prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. It is far too dangerous to have nuclear weapons in the hands of a radical theocracy. And while we should take no option, including military action, off the table, sustained and aggressive diplomacy combined with tough sanctions should be our primary means to prevent Iran from building nuclear weapons.” As far as I know, none of the presidential candidates, Republican or Democrat, is saying anything different. Obama’s position on Hamas, which the AJ Committee staffer also questions without any reference to statements by the senator, has been equally strong: “We must maintain the isolation of Hamas. To end the isolation, Hamas must first recognize Israel’s right to exist; renounce the use of violence; and abide by past agreements between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.” Here, again, Obama is in step with Israel’s leadership. None of Israel’s supporters is saying anything different. The AJ Committee has since apologized to the Obama campaign for “any inaccuracies that the memorandum might have contained,” explaining that it was prepared “on a tight deadline immediately after the Iowa caucuses.” Let there be no mistake: Obama is a friend of Israel. Everything he has said and done in his private life and in a decade of public service confirms his deep commitment to the security and well being of the Jewish state. Alfred Moses
Honorary President
American Jewish Committee
Washington, D.C.
February 1, 2008
Daca vreti, cititi despre povestea de dragoste a lui Alfred Moses la 76 plus de ani, aici:
“(…)That was in September, on a 10-day walking tour in Italy, and Ms. Schad was bowled over by Mr. Moses’s attention, said Abigail Schoff, her roommate on the trip. “She went from being a 60-something woman to being a teenager,” Ms. Schoff said. In October, Ms. Schad and Mr. Moses began traveling together, first to Istanbul, where Mr. Moses donated a Torah for the rededication of the Neve Shalom Synagogue, which had been bombed by terrorists in 2003. “Turkey was a revelation,” Ms. Schad said. “He was really a person of intellectual substance.” A month later they went to Romania, where they had lunch with the president at the time, Ion Iliescu, and then stole away for an overnight in the countryside. (…)”
Mr. Dov Alfon Editor-in-chief, Haaretz 21 Schocken St., Tel Aviv 61001, Israel
Dear Mr. Alfon,
I am writing to express my disappointment regarding the publication, on November 2, 2008 in Haaretz, of an article regarding Romania, under the title “The state Romania’s president forgot” (“Anti-Semitism is alive and kicking in Romania” in the on-line edition).
Accusing President Traian Băsescu and the entire Romanian people of Anti-Semitism is totally unwarranted and misleading. The recent desecration of the Jewish cemetery in Bucharest is a very serious incident which is treated as such by the Romanian authorities. The President of Romania, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Justice expressed their outrage about this criminal act and conveyed their solidarity with the representatives of the Jewish Community in Bucharest. Such an appalling act does not reflect in any way the good relations and the feelings of respect and friendship that Romanian citizens have towards the members of the Jewish communities in Romania. The authorities are investigating this incident and we trust that the perpetrators of this sacrilege will be caught and brought to justice. The Ministry of Interior has expressed its full support to the Federation of the Jewish Communities in Romania and gave assurance of their cooperation for the prevention of any such crimes in the future.
As you may know, Romania was actively involved in the last few years in a very serious effort of coming to terms with the past and promoting Holocaust awareness. Following the work of the Commission for the Study of Holocaust in Romania, headed by Prof. Elie Wiesel, we established an annual commemoration day for the Holocaust and an Institute for Holocaust Studies, we introduced Holocaust education in the national curricula, we joined the Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research and a Holocaust Memorial is under construction in Bucharest. Romania has also been very active in combating Anti-Semitism, as we strongly supported the OSCE Conferences on Combating Anti-Semitism and we were hosts to such a ministerial level meeting, in 2007, in Bucharest. Just as recent as last month, Romania initiated and hosted another important regional meeting on combating Anti-Semitism, at expert level.
As far as the statement of President Băsescu is concerned, the quotation was taken out the context and is incomplete. In fact, President Băsescu did mention Israel and the ongoing negotiations with Syria in that statement, just a couple of paragraphs below. Furthermore, insulting an elected head of a democratic state is hardly the best way to get your message across and is beneath the high professional standards and reputation of Haaretz.
I would like to use this opportunity to assure you that the Embassy and I are available to you and your editorial staff regarding information or clarification on any issue related to Romania.
Traian Basescu l-a sfatuit pe ambasadorul american in Romania, Nicolas Taubman, ca ar fi bine inainte de a critica lupta impotriva coruptie din tara noastra, sa priveasca mai atent la sistemul bancar american, informeaza agentiile de stiri. Intrebat de catre realizatorul Paul Grigoriu in emisiunea “Sfertul Academic”, transmisa de postul national de radio, cum apreciaza declaratia ambasadorului Taubman, potrivit careia Romania ramane o tara de corupti, Traian Basescu l-a indemnat pe ambasador sa vada dezastrul din sistemul bancar american apoi sa se pronunte pe tema coruptiei din tara noastra.
“Cred ca expresia ambasadorului este si nemeritata, si prea dura, si eu n-o voi comenta mai mult decat rugandu-l sa priveasca in tara dansului la sistemul bancar. Romania a trecut prin aceasta perioada in anii ’90 si ne-a costat peste doua miliarde de dolari, la vremea aceea, Bancorex-ul, Banca Agricola, Bankcoop-ul… Dar in tara dansului este un dezastru in sistemul bancar, in care trezoreria Statelor Unite oficial pompeaza 700 de miliarde ca sa acopere pana la urma lipsa de corectitudine a sistemului bancar. Pentru ca daca ar fi fost corect nu ajungea in situatia in care mari banci sa fie tinute cu injectii din bani publici”.
Basescu a continuat afirmand ca Romania nu ar trebui sa mai primeasca lectii in privinta combaterii coruptiei, in ciuda faptului ca, “coruptii nostrii nu sun la fel de rafinati ca ai lor”. “Deci… este o invitatie pe care eu o fac oricarui politician strain care se gandeste la coruptia din Romania – pe care nu o neg, atentie! Dar lectii nu prea ar trebui sa mai primim, pentru ca uitati-va la cei care ne dau lectii ce se intampla in tarile lor exact in zona in care cinstea trebuie sa fie totala, zona in care se lucreaza cu banii”, a mai spus presedintele Romaniei, Traian Basescu.
Desigur, o lista a partenerilor strategici pentru coruptie – in care intra si traficul de influenta si fuga de Justitie -, practicata de unele personaje in numele Americii, ar fi destul de lunga, incepand cu Bechtel sau cazul Teo Peter, continuand cu traficul/adoptiile de copii romani/albi si ajungand pana la asa-zisa “societate civila”, centralizata. Si aici poate Ambasada SUA ar trebui sa ma ia aminte la o declaratie de-a presedintelui Romaniei:
“Aceasta lege a fost o minciuna promovata de Guvern si de domnul Pirvulescu. Din acest moment, personal o sa-l mai cred pe domnul Pirvulescu si in analizele dansului CAND SOTIA DOMNIEI SALE NU VA MAI FI SALARIATA LA GUVERN. Cat timp ramane in Palatul Victoria sa nu mai vanda analize politice nimanui!”.
V-ati prins: este vorba de distinsul analist multilateral dezvoltat Cristian Pirvulescu – dat jos prin vot liber de la presedintia Asociatia Pro-Democratia si repus ilegal in functie – si de sotia sa, Daniela Cristina, care lucreaza, si acum, pentru “sectorul neguvernamental” la… Guvernul Romaniei condus de Calin Popescu Tariceanu, acelasi care i-a oferit, printre altele, si premiul PNL sotului subalternei sale.
Desigur, daca presedintele Romaniei nu este credibil pentru tragatorii de sfori din Ambasada (deh, ca peste tot in lume prin diverse structuri…), ar fi bine sa ia aminte la interviul dat de diplomatul american de cariera Kiki Skagen Munshi subsemnatului: SUA trebuie sa schimbe calea razboiului in Irak: ZIUA, unde se refera si la niste paraziti pretutindenari care bruiaza dialogul sincer si constructiv intre inteligentele romanesti si cele americane.
PS: Nu ascund faptul ca sunt ultragiat in fata faptului ca un proiect vizand cooperarea la Marea Neagra, pe care l-am discutat in urma cu doi ani cu un inalt functionar al Ambasadei, a ajuns sa fie furat de altii mai marunti si pus in practica, prost, de o sumedenie de infractori transfrontalieri. Rusinica!
Steagul Consiliului National Secuiesc (CNS) a fost arborat pe Primaria din Miercurea Ciuc, iar conducerea orasului refuza sa-l inlature pe motiv ca nu se incalca nici-o lege. Steagul respectiv – soarele si luna in auriu, pe fond albastru deschis -, flutura pe sediul Primariei Miercurea Ciuc de saptamana trecuta, de la vizita presedintelui Ungariei, Solyom Laszlo. Viceprimarul muncipiului, Antal Attila, a declarat ca steagul nu a fost arborat special pentru presedintele Ungariei, dar a recunoscut ca in ziua vizitei presedintelui Romaniei, Traian Basescu, a fost inlaturat, dupa care a fost reasezat pe sediul primariei, relateaza Agerpres. Antal Attila a adaugat ca steagul secuiesc a fost arborat pentru ca “asa credem ca este bine”, subliniind ca lucrul respectiv “nu este nici interzis si nici ilegal”. Intrebat daca steagul va fi indepartat, viceprimarul a raspuns ca, “deocamdata, el va ramane acolo”. Prefectul Harghitei, Constantin Strujan, a declarat ca legea prevede conditii clare de arborare a drapelului national, iar daca aceasta nu se face in conditiile legii, primarul risca sanctiuni. Strujan a dispus un control la nivelul intregului judet, deoarece mai sunt si alte primarii, cum ar fi cea din Gheorgheni, pe care flutura steagul CNS si a spus ca sanctiunile urmeaza sa se aplice dupa finalizarea campaniei electorale. “Cei care incalca legea vor primi sanctiunile pe 6 decembrie, de Sfantul Nicolae. Nu vreau sa se interpeteze, nu vreau sa fac campanie electorala nimanui”, a spus Strujan. Steagul CNS este arborat si in sala de protocol a Consiliului Judetean din Miercurea Ciuc, dar el este indepartat atunci cand se au loc videoconferinte cu Guvernul sau intalniri ale Colegiului Prefectural. (ZIUA Online)
RADIO ROMANIA ACTUALITATI (20 octombrie, ora 16:03) – Presedintele Traian Basescu a declarat la Damasc ca in cadrul convorbirilor avute cu omologul sau sirian, Bashar Al-Assad, a fost abordata si problema iraniana. La randul sau, presedintele Siriei a vorbit despre traditia relatiilor romano-siriene si despre deschiderea unor noi perspective in domeniile economic si politic, in contextul problematicii actuale din Orientul Mijlociu. Reporter: Oana Bala – Seful statului a tinut sa precizeze care este punctul de vedere al Romaniei in aceasta privinta. Traian Basescu: Apreciem ca orice tara, orice stat are dreptul sa-si dezvolte programe nucleare civile. Deci, acest drept il are si Iranul. În acelasi timp, precizam ca Iranul are obligatia la transparenta in relatia cu comunitatea internationala pentru a indeparta orice suspiciune ca programul nuclear al Iranului ar avea si valente militare. Reporter: Presedintele Siriei, Bashar Al-Assad, a vorbit despre deschiderea unor noi perspective politice si economice. Bashar Al-Assad: Vizita presedintelui Basescu vine sa intareasca aceasta relatie veche si sa-i deschida noi perspective in viitor, in special in contextul problematicii actuale pe care o cunoaste lumea in momentul de fata si in special zona Orientului Mijlociu. Reporter: Întrebat de un jurnalist roman daca Romania va incheia cu Siria un acord in domeniul justitiei, Traian Basescu a declarat ca subiectul Omar Hayssam a fost discutat, dar nu a facut alte precizari pe aceasta tema./ UPDATE: La finalul întrevederii cu omologul său sirian Bashar al-Assad, preşedintele Traian Băsescu a afirmat că România şi Siria susţin că proiectul Nabucco poate fi aprovizionat din zona Caspică, Iran şi Egipt, transmite NewsIn. SINCRON TRAIAN BĂSESCU, preşedintele României: “Pe teritoriul Siriei se finalizează gazoductul care tranferă gaze din Egipt către Turcia. (…) Or România este una din ţările care susţin că proiectul Nabucco poate fi aptrovizionat cu gaze din zona Caspică din Iran şi din Egipt.” Pai, noi ce ziceam?… QED Concluzia maestrului Cristoiu: deci, am fost antemergatorii lui Basescu… ma rog, a politicii Romaniei!
Proiectul Nabucco este dinamitat de un aranjament direct intre Elvetia si Iran
Presedintele Romaniei, Traian Basescu, este asteptat intr-o vizita oficiala in Iran de catre omologul sau Mahmud Ahmadinejad, ne-a confirmat la Teheran ministrul adjunct de Externe, dr. Mehdi Safari. Oferta a fost facuta in timpul unei intalniri dintre presedintele Basescu si ambasadorul Iranului la Bucuresti, Hamid Reza Arshadi. “Asteptam ca Administratia Prezidentiala de la Bucuresti sa ne trimita o propunere concreta, dupa care vom fixa si data exacta a acestei posibile intalniri la nivel inalt”, a declarat oficialul iranian unui grup al presei romane invitat in Iran pentru prima oara dupa 1989. Atat Romania cat si Iranul se bucura de pozitii geostrategice importante si aceasta realitate trebuie valorificata, a apreciat ministrul Safari. In acest sens, oficialul de la Teheran considera ca, fara Iran, “proiectul Nabucco nu poate fi o reusita”, amintind faptul ca aceasta tara se afla pe locul doi in lume, dupa Rusia, in ceea ce priveste resursele de gaz si e pe locul patru in privinta celor petrolifere. Ofertei iraniene i se opune insa administratia americana.
Presedintele Romaniei a venit nervos din Spania. Si pe buna dreptate. La patru ani de la preluarea mandatului, a ajuns la vorba noastra. Practic, Basescu a citat din ZIUA: “Statul roman trebuie sa renunte la a mai batjocori romanii de pretutindeni prin neimplicarea in sprijinirea actiunilor lor”. Diferenta dintre noi si el este insa ca Traian Basescu, in calitate de presedinte al Romaniei, este chiar reprezentarea Statului. Dar, domnul presedinte vrea sa ne spuna ca Statul “nu sunt eu”. Oricum, iata pana unde s-a ajuns: seful statului roman este silit sa sara in sus pentru ca drepturile romanilor de pretutindeni nu sunt respectate de… statul roman. Desigur, aici se pot gasi multe interpretari. Unii, care din prea mare intindere morala si intelectuala nu-si mai regasesc “patria” in Romania, o tara de care oricum nu apartin, ar putea spune ca statul roman nici nu mai exista. O si fac, de altfel, atacand prin toate mijloacele identitatea nationala, pe care – iata! – Basescu se cazneste sa o apere. Deci, despre care stat mai vorbim? In acelasi discurs incendiar privind apararea drepturilor romanilor, Basescu trimite politicienii la lege: la Legea 299/2007. Pai, din primul articol al acesteia aflam asa: “Prezenta lege reglementeaza: a) drepturile persoanelor de etnie romana, precum si ale celor care apartin filonului cultural romanesc, din afara granitelor Romaniei, denumite in continuare romani de pretutindeni, avand ca scop mentinerea, promovarea si afirmarea identitatii lor culturale, etnice, lingvistice si religioase; b) atributiile autoritatilor competente din Romania”. Daca domnul presedinte s-a referit la problemele statului roman in raport cu punctul a), atunci avem o problema. Chiar la Cotroceni, un fel de institutie a… statului roman. Pentru ca onor ditamai presedintele pompos intitulatei “Comisia prezidentiala de analiza a regimului politic si constitutional din Romania”, care se ocupa de “cadrul dezbaterii privind revizuirea Constitutiei si reorganizarea institutionala a statului”, are cu totul alte pareri decat seful statului. Preparatorul Ioan Statomir considera asa, vizavi de identitatea nationala, de “specificul national”, tratat intre ghilimele: ca este “o obsesie din imaginarul national”, “un element fantasmatic central” si, oricum, “in cele din urma, identitatea nationala monolitica se fisureaza in mii de spatii guvernate de afinitati elective”. Asa ca, ce ne mai trebuie “identitate nationala”, cand aceasta este, conform editorului Andrei Cornea, care i-a publicat opiniile lui Ioan Statomir: “o conserva insipida, o marfa expirata. Feriti-va – e toxica!”. Acest om lucreaza la schimbarea din temelii a Constitutiei – de ce nu ar incepe prin renuntarea la Articolul 1 privind caracterul statului national, suveran, unitar si indivizibil? – si la reorganizarea institutionala – de ce nu si teritoriala? – a statului pe care, iata, presedintele vrea sa-l apere atat pentru romanii de acasa, cat si pentru cei de pretutindeni. Daca insa domnul presedinte se referea la problemele statului in raport cu punctul b), atunci trebuie aratat ca legea inlocuieste referirile la “Ministerul Afacerilor Externe” si la “ministrul Afacerilor Externe” cu referiri la “Cancelaria Primului-Ministru”, respectiv “seful Cancelariei Primului-Ministru”. Si atunci Statul, aflam, e Calin Popescu Tariceanu. Adevarat. Cum la fel de adevarat este si ca bugetul Departamentului pentru Relatiile cu Romanii de Pretutindeni e insignifiant. Dupa cum arata presedintele, pentru cei 10 milioane de romani din afara tarii, in 2007 au fost alocate 20 de milioane de lei, iar anul acesta 10, dintre care 5 au fost datorii. Comparativ, tot in aceeasi perioada, Institutul Cultural Roman a avut un buget de 45,5 milioane lei, “pentru promovarea in strainatate a culturii romane si protejarea identitatii culturale” a… statului roman, cred… Ce ar mai fi de spus? Aproape nimeni nu observa ca pentru acesti romani, circa 10 milioane, dupa cum arata presedintele, sunt desemnati 2 senatori si 4 deputati, care trebuie sa strabata intreaga strainatate. Iar pentru cei 20 de milioane ramasi avem 137 de senatori si 332 de deputati. Asa a decis… statul roman.
PS: Intre timp Legea 209/2007 s-a schimbat printr-o OU care a intors DRRP-ul la MAE, la inceputul anului. Dar degeaba. Tot ICR-ul toaca de 10 ori mai multi bani decat are DRRP pentru romanii din intreaga lume. Degeaba se semnaleaza la cel mai inalt nivel, din februarie, ca nu se pot derula programele angajate cu doar 5 milioane de lei! Evident, Basescu s-a referit la mult mai multe din Legea 209: Congresul romanilor de pretutindeni, etc. Cu ce bani? Ca sunt mai importante erectiile lui Iuda si exportul de “turnatori buni”, de-ai nostri, anti-romani! Din cate inteleg Basescu vrea o centralizare a oficiilor care se ocupa de romanii de pretutindeni, evntual sub bagheta Presedintiei, ceea ce am propus de la inceputul mandatului sau. Dar daca o face cu genitali penali ca Patapievici & Co le ucide identitate mai repede decat o fac Iuscenko si Voronin. Ca sa nu mai vorbim de faptul ca ar trebui, de fapt, doua institutii separate. Una este sa tratezi cu romani plecati la munca in Occident si alta sa aperi drepturile incalcate ale celor din Rasaritul romanesc. In fine, cu gasca sinistra de la GDS, de care s-a lasat inconjurat, nu o sa faca niciodata ceva pentru tara ci numai pentru dusmanii ei. Iar intr-o zi o sa-l devoreze si pe el cu tot cu cascheta de Capitan, dupa cum i-am mai spus-o! In fine, mai exista, totusi, niste sperante… Despre planul de distrugere a Romaniei gasiti detalii prin campaniile purtate de anti-crestinii dereglati mintal si hormonal Alina Mungiu Pippidenara si Andrei Plesu “Tulceanu” in Dilema veche iar “noile directive” sunt date in suplimentul GDS “Altfel despre identitatea nationala” din revista “22” cu nr 967 din 16 – 21 septembrie 2008 (in baza paginii de web a “22”, sectiunea Arhiva). Aici veti afla ca sceleratii de neo-kominternisti care isi permit sa considere “toxica” identitatea noastra mai afirma, prin aluzii sau direct, ca: romanii sunt o reprezentare a raului transmis “biologic sau istoric, genetic sau social” si ca , de aceea, trebuie “sa ne descotorisim de trecut”, ca romanii de ne-elita (ca ei) dispretuiesc “adevarata cultura europeana” promovata numai de Patapievici, Liiceanu, Plesu si restul cooperativei, care, saracii, sunt victimele “calibanilor Romaniei integrate (ca Dan Voiculescu si Antenele sale, o parte dintre ziaristii Realitatii TV, ziarul Ziua si altii ca ei)” – “Romania integrata” vs Romania dezintegrata? -, ca arta nu mai poate fi “nationala”, si ca ICR este avangarda noii ordini cultural-politice dintr-o “Altfel” de Romanie. Urmariti campania anti-Romania “Altfel” care se deruleaza in medii diferite. “Altfel” adica pe dos! Stupizii astia au locuri asigurate in Iad. Parca si vad etichetele: Rezervat pentru “elita”!
Gasiti aici proiectele de Rezolutie si Recomandare privind situatia minoritatilor nationale din Voivodina si a minoritatii etnice romane din Serbia cu toate amendamentele depuse de membrii APCE. Ele sunt discutate chiar acum de Comisia Juridica si Drepturile Omului a APCE. Din pacate, Romania e reprezentata de Gyury Frundo. Singurul (roman) care poate face ceva este Vlad Cubreacov. Serbia se tine tare. Mai precis, sustine ca nu exista nici o similitudine intre “vlahi” si romani. Este vorba de un reprezentant al “democratilor” sarbi, partidul presedintelui “reformist”. Ma intreb, pe buna dreptate, de ce s-au tot pupat atunci Basescu cu Tadici? Pentru asta?
PROVISIONAL Doc. 11528 The situation of national minorities in Vojvodina and of the Romanian ethnic minority in Serbia Compendium of Amendments 30 September 2008
Draft Resolution 1. The Parliamentary Assembly notes that Europe’s societies are today multicultural and multiethnic in character. Amendment 1 Presented by Mrs Nadezhda MIKHAILOVA, Mr Ivan Nikolaev IVANOV, Mr Ivan POPESCU, Mrs Aneliya ATANASOVA, Mrs Darinka STANTCHEVA, Mr Jean HUSS, Mrs Eva GARCÍA PASTOR The title of the Resolution should read as follows:”The situation of national minorities in Vojvodina and of the Romanian and Bulgarian ethnic minorities in Serbia”. 2. It resolutely defends cultural diversity, the importance of which is highlighted in several Council of Europe instruments and especially the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (CETS No. 157) and in the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages (CETS No. 148). 3. Diversity is not to be perceived as a threat, but as a source of enrichment. It should be respected and preserved as a fundamental component of any democratic society. Upholding the principles of human rights, rule of law and democracy is the best guarantee for diversity to be respected. 4. Serbia, like the entire region of the Balkans, is one of Europe’s most multicultural countries. It must take up the inherent challenges of all multicultural societies by promoting a vision of society founded on respect for diversity, and by combating all forms of intolerance and discrimination. 5. The region, Serbia included, remains marked by interethnic tensions, which are the legacy of the anti-minority policy of the Milošević era. Even today, incidents of an ethnic nature, with varying degrees of intensity, are recorded in Serbia. Amendment 12 Presented by Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Mr Davit HARUTYUNYAN, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ In the draft resolution, delete paragraph 5. Amendment 10 Presented by Mr György FRUNDA, Mr Zoltán SZABÓ, Mr Christos POURGOURIDES, Mr Tadeusz IWIŃSKI, Mr Andreas GROSS, Mrs Cornelia CAZACU In the draft resolution, paragraph 5, after the words “anti-minority policy of the” insert the following words:”past, mainly the”. 6. The Assembly stresses that intercultural dialogue and respect for the diversity of cultures are guarantees for long-term peace and stability in the region. 7. Whereas the present situation in Vojvodina, a province whose composite ethnic make-up is one of the most pronounced in Serbia, seems satisfactory, and ethnic incidents are few and mild in intensity, it must be noted that in 2004 – a period marked by numerous and alarming interethnic incidents – the authorities reacted far too tardily. Amendment 13 Presented by Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Mr Davit HARUTYUNYAN, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr József BERÉNYI, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ, Mr Iván FARKAS, Mr Zoltán SZABÓ In the draft resolution, replace paragraph 7 with the following paragraph:”The present situation in the Serbian province of Vojvodina, whose composite ethnic make-up is one of the most pronounced in the country, seems satisfactory and ethnic incidents are now few. Nevertheless, it must be noted that alarming interethnic incidents occured in 2004.” Amendment 11 Presented by Mr György FRUNDA, Mr Zoltán SZABÓ, Mr Aristotelis PAVLIDIS, Mr Christos POURGOURIDES, Mr Tadeusz IWIŃSKI, Mr Andreas GROSS, Mrs Cornelia CAZACU In the draft resolution, at the end of paragraph 7, add the following words: “and in an inadequate manner.” Amendment 28 Presented by Mr György FRUNDA, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Mr Zoltán SZABÓ, Mr Frano MATUŠIĆ, Mrs Marija PEJČINOVIĆ-BURIĆ, Mrs Karmela CAPARIN, Mr Mario ZUBOVIĆ In the draft resolution, paragraph 7, replace the words “seems satisfactory, and ethnic incidents are few and mild in intensity,” with the following words:”and ethnic incidents are few,”. 8. The Assembly urges the Serbian authorities always to react with great celerity and firmness against the perpetrators of interethnic violence in all its forms. 9. The Assembly welcomes the fact that a number of praiseworthy initiatives, including the 2002 legislative package, have been taken to advance the rights of national minorities, and encourages the authorities to pursue their efforts. Amendment 14 Presented by Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Mr Davit HARUTYUNYAN, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr József BERÉNYI, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ, Mr Iván FARKAS, Mr Zoltán SZABÓ In the draft resolution, paragraph 9, line 2, after the words “legislative package” insert the following words:”and the new 2007 Serbian Constitution”. Amendment 29 Presented by Mr Holger HAIBACH, Ms Marietta de POURBAIX-LUNDIN, Mr Boriss CILEVIČS, Mrs Herta DÄUBLER-GMELIN, Mr Dick MARTY In the draft resolution, after paragraph 9, insert the following paragraph:”In this respect, the Assembly is very pleased to note that since the last elections the position of Minister for Human and Minority Rights has been re-instated and that the representatives of minorities are part of the ruling coalition with ministerial mandates.” 10. These efforts should be backed up by a communication policy on the part of the state authorities, religious institutions and the media to promote the spirit of tolerance and intercultural dialogue and combat discrimination. 11. The Assembly is pleased to note that a draft law against discrimination has been prepared and submitted for comment to the Venice Commission. Considering that, in Serbia, discrimination against members of minorities is still common, it is especially important that a law of this kind be speedily adopted and implemented. Amendment 16 Presented by Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Mr Davit HARUTYUNYAN, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr József BERÉNYI, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ, Mr Iván FARKAS, Mr Zoltán SZABÓ In the draft resolution, paragraph 11, replace the second sentence with the following words:”The adoption and implementation of this law is especially important for the prevention of any future discrimination against members of minorities.” 12. The Assembly is of the opinion that the ombudsman could and should perform an important role here. It therefore welcomes the long-awaited appointment of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Serbia on 29 June 2007. 13. Furthermore, the authorities must make every effort to build the confidence of the minorities in the state’s representatives and to combat prejudices against minorities that may persist within the law enforcement agencies and the judiciary. The Assembly welcomes the existence of a programme to increase the representation of members of minorities in the police and judicial establishments, notably the establishment of a multiethnic police force in southern Serbia. It encourages the authorities to extend this initiative to other regions and especially Vojvodina. Amendment 24 Presented by Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr József BERÉNYI, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ, Mr Iván FARKAS, Mr Zoltán SZABÓ, Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Mr Armen RUSTAMYAN In the draft resolution, paragraph 13, delete the first sentence. Amendment 25 Presented by Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr József BERÉNYI, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ, Mr Iván FARKAS, Mr Zoltán SZABÓ, Mr György FRUNDA, Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Mr Armen RUSTAMYAN In the draft resolution, paragraph 13, after the word “extend”, insert the following words:”and apply”. 14. The Assembly is nonetheless concerned to observe serious deficiencies in the realisation of the rights of minorities. It is the duty of the national, regional and local authorities to ensure full implementation of the relevant legislative provisions. 15. Some legislative provisions have been lacking for several years, and this prevents the potential of the legislative framework developed in 2002 from being exploited to the best effect for the benefit of members of minorities. 16. The Assembly is of the opinion that these shortcomings in the legislative apparatus impair the credibility of the authorities’ political will as regards the rights of minorities and is not conducive to building the confidence of the members of national minorities in the authorities. 17. The Assembly is also concerned about divergences observed between regions in the enforcement of the rights of minorities and in the effective access to those rights for their members. It observes, in particular, that the members of national minorities in north-eastern Serbia are in a distinctly less favourable position that those of Vojvodina. Amendment 15 Presented by Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Mr Davit HARUTYUNYAN, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr József BERÉNYI, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ, Mr Iván FARKAS, Mr Zoltán SZABÓ In the draft resolution, paragraph 17, delete the word “north-“. 18. As to the question of the identity of minorities, and especially with regard to the debate over the Romanian and Vlach minorities, the Assembly recalls the principle set out in Article 3 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and reaffirms that any attempt to impose an identity on a person, or on a group of persons, is inadmissible. Amendment 2 Presented by Mrs Nadezhda MIKHAILOVA, Mr Ivan Nikolaev IVANOV, Mr Ivan POPESCU, Mrs Aneliya ATANASOVA, Mrs Darinka STANTCHEVA, Mr Jean HUSS, Mrs Eva GARCÍA PASTOR In the draft resolution, paragraph 18, after the words “Romanian and Vlach minorities”, insert the following words:”, as well as the Bulgarian minority”. 19. The Assembly therefore encourages the members of the Vlach/Romanian minority in eastern Serbia to combine their efforts and overcome their internal disagreements in their own interest and in order to preserve the distinctive traits that make up their identity. Here the Serbian authorities have a duty not to impede but to support initiatives in that direction. Amendment 3 Presented by Mrs Nadezhda MIKHAILOVA, Mr Ivan Nikolaev IVANOV, Mr Ivan POPESCU, Mrs Aneliya ATANASOVA, Mrs Darinka STANTCHEVA, Mr Jean HUSS, Mrs Eva GARCÍA PASTOR In the draft resolution, paragraph 19, after the words “Vlach/Romanian minority”, insert the following words:”and the Bulgarian national minority”. Amendment 17 Presented by Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Mr Davit HARUTYUNYAN, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr József BERÉNYI, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ, Mr Iván FARKAS In the draft resolution, paragraph 19, replace the words “Vlach/Romanian minority” with the following words:”Romanian and Vlach minorities”. Amendment 18 Presented by Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Mr Davit HARUTYUNYAN, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr József BERÉNYI, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ, Mr Iván FARKAS In the draft resolution, paragraph 19, replace the word “identity” with the following word:”identities”. 20. Aware of the criticisms which have been levelled at the law of 2006 on churches and religious organisations in the Republic of Serbia, and particularly the question of (non) recognition of the Romanian Orthodox Church by that law, the Assembly is surprised at the dominant influence of the Serbian Orthodox Church in the recognition of other churches and/or religious communities. The Assembly invites the Serbian authorities to look into this question and to delete the references to the canon law of one church with respect to the other churches or religious communities. Amendment 19 Presented by Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ In the draft resolution, delete paragraph 20. 21. Finally, aware that co-operation between the state of residence and the kin-state under bilateral agreements is of real value in guaranteeing stability in Europe, the Assembly calls upon the Serbian authorities to intensify their good neighbourly relations with the kin-states (Romania, Hungary and “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”) by fully implementing the bilateral agreements which they have signed. Amendment 4 Presented by Mrs Nadezhda MIKHAILOVA, Mr Ivan Nikolaev IVANOV, Mr Ivan POPESCU, Mrs Aneliya ATANASOVA, Mrs Darinka STANTCHEVA, Mr Jean HUSS, Mrs Eva GARCÍA PASTOR In the draft resolution, paragraph 21, after the words “Romania, Hungary”, insert the following word:”, Bulgaria”. Amendment 9 Presented by Mrs Mirjana FERIĆ-VAC, Mr Miljenko DORIĆ, Mr Frano MATUŠIĆ, Mr Mario ZUBOVIĆ, Mr Kornél ALMÁSSY, Mr Attila GRUBER In the draft resolution, paragraph 21, after the words “Romania, Hungary”, insert the following word:”, Croatia”. Amendment 20 Presented by Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ, Mr Davit HARUTYUNYAN In the draft resolution, at the end of paragraph 21, add the following sentence:”The same applies to the authorities of the kin-states.” 22. Accordingly, the Assembly invites the competent authorities of the Republic of Serbia: 22.1. to pay greater attention to allegations of interethnic violence and deal with them expeditiously, firmly and efficaciously, particularly by means of effective police investigations and judicial proceedings; 22.2. to consider re-instating the position of Minister for Human and Minority Rights; Amendment 30 Presented by Mr Holger HAIBACH, Ms Marietta de POURBAIX-LUNDIN, Mr Boriss CILEVIČS, Mrs Herta DÄUBLER-GMELIN, Mr Dick MARTY In the draft resolution, delete paragraph 22.2. 22.3. to ensure that the legislation on the rights of minorities, particularly the laws enacted in 2002, are effectively implemented; 22.4. to establish as speedily as possible the fund for promoting the social, economic, cultural and general development of national minorities provided for in section 20 of the framework law of 2002 on the protection of the rights and freedoms of national minorities; 22.5. to rapidly pass a law against discrimination, taking into account the comments made by the Venice Commission; 22.6. to adopt as a matter of priority the legislative texts on the financing and election of the national councils for national minorities, taking account of the comments by Council of Europe experts on the draft law on elections; Amendment 26 Presented by Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr József BERÉNYI, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ, Mr Iván FARKAS, Mr Zoltán SZABÓ, Mr György FRUNDA, Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Mr Armen RUSTAMYAN In the draft resolution, paragraph 22.6, replace the words “financing and election” with the following words:”election, competences and financing”. 22.7. to define more precisely the functions and obligations of the national councils for national minorities while granting them the necessary funds to accomplish their missions; 22.8. to introduce a mechanism enabling the national councils for national minorities to supervise the acts of the executive with regard to the rights of minorities; 22.9. to convene more frequent and regular meetings of the National Council for National Minorities; 22.10. to envisage appointing a deputy ombudsman in charge of questions relating to the rights of minorities;
22.11. to give the autonomous provinces adequate financial guarantees; Amendment 21 Presented by Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ In the draft resolution, delete paragraph 22.11. Amendment 31 Presented by Mr Holger HAIBACH, Ms Marietta de POURBAIX-LUNDIN, Mr Boriss CILEVIČS, Mrs Herta DÄUBLER-GMELIN, Mr Dick MARTY In the draft resolution, replace paragraph 22.11 with the following sub-paragraph:”while acknowledging the improvements contained in the new Constitution in this respect, to further strengthen the stability of the budgets of the autonomous provinces;” 22.12. to take positive measures in favour of persons belonging to minorities, including the Vlach/Romanian minority, and to eradicate all discrimination against their members; Amendment 22 Presented by Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr József BERÉNYI, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ, Mr Iván FARKAS, Mr Armen RUSTAMYAN In the draft resolution, paragraph 22.12, replace the words “Vlach/Romanian minority” with the following words:”Romanian and Vlach minorities”. Amendment 27 Presented by Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Mr Zoltán SZABÓ, Mr Frano MATUŠIĆ, Mrs Marija PEJČINOVIĆ-BURIĆ, Mrs Karmela CAPARIN, Mr Gvozden Srećko FLEGO, Mr Mario ZUBOVIĆ, Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Ms Kateřina KONEČNÁ In the draft resolution, paragraph 22.12, replace the words “minorities, including the Vlach/Romanian minority,” with the following words:”all national minorities”. 22.13. to intensify their efforts for the furtherance of initiatives to promote a spirit of tolerance and intercultural dialogue; 22.14. to step up initiatives to train teachers with the requisite qualifications for language teaching and teaching in minority languages; 22.15. to continue developing bilingual and mother-tongue schools; 22.16. to eliminate the regional differences that exist in effective safeguards for the rights of minorities (particularly for the use of minority languages in administration, education in minority languages, freedom of religion, etc.) by the full application throughout the territory of the existing legislation in these matters; 22.17. to take the necessary measures in order to provide for the Vlachs/Romanians living in Eastern Serbia (the Timoc, Morava and Danube valleys) access to education, the media and public administration in their mother tongue and to allow them to hold religious services in that language; Amendment 23 Presented by Mr Miloš ALIGRUDIĆ, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Donka BANOVIĆ, Ms Nataša VUČKOVIĆ, Mr Dragoljub MIĆUNOVIĆ, Mr József BERÉNYI, Mr Egidijus VAREIKIS, Mr Miloš JEVTIĆ, Mr Iván FARKAS In the draft resolution, replace paragraph 22.17 with the following sub-paragraph:”to take necessary measures in order to facilitate access to education, the media and public administration in their mother tongues for the Romanian and Vlach minorities living in Eastern Serbia;” Amendment 5 Presented by Mrs Nadezhda MIKHAILOVA, Mr Ivan Nikolaev IVANOV, Mr Ivan POPESCU, Mrs Aneliya ATANASOVA, Mrs Darinka STANTCHEVA, Mr Jean HUSS, Mrs Eva GARCÍA PASTOR In the draft resolution, paragraph 22.17, after the words “Vlachs/Romanians”, insert the following words:”and Bulgarians”. Amendment 6 Presented by Mrs Nadezhda MIKHAILOVA, Mr Ivan Nikolaev IVANOV, Mr Ivan POPESCU, Mrs Aneliya ATANASOVA, Mrs Darinka STANTCHEVA, Mr Jean HUSS, Mrs Eva GARCÍA PASTOR In the draft resolution, paragraph 22.17, after the words “the Timoc, Morava and Danube valleys”, insert the following words:”as well as the Districts of Dimitrovgrad and Bosilegrad”. 22.18. to identify and apply technical solutions which would enable persons living in eastern Serbia to receive broadcasts in Romanian made in Vojvodina; 22.19. to provide for exceptions to the media privatisation procedures for the benefit of the media operating in minority languages, in order to ensure their viability. 23. The Assembly also calls upon Serbia and the kin-states concerned to convene as early as possible the joint intergovernmental committees provided for in the bilateral agreements concluded by them on co-operation in the field of the protection of national minorities. 24. The Assembly invites its Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by member states of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee) to take proper account of the proposals contained in this resolution while conducting its dialogue with the Serbian authorities.
Draft Recommendation 1. The Parliamentary Assembly, referring to its Resolution … (2008) on The situation of national minorities in Vojvodina and of the Romanian ethnic minority in Serbia, invites the Committee of Ministers to take into account, during its regular monitoring, the recommendations made to the Serbian authorities in the aforementioned Resolution, and bear it in mind in the context of the forthcoming cycle of monitoring under the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. Amendment 7 Presented by Mrs Nadezhda MIKHAILOVA, Mr Ivan Nikolaev IVANOV, Mrs Aneliya ATANASOVA, Mrs Darinka STANTCHEVA, Mr Ivan POPESCU, Mr Jean HUSS, Mrs Eva GARCÍA PASTOR The title of the Recommendation should read as follows:”The situation of national minorities in Vojvodina and of Romanian and Bulgarian ethnic minorities in Serbia”. Amendment 8 Presented by Mrs Nadezhda MIKHAILOVA, Mr Ivan Nikolaev IVANOV, Mrs Aneliya ATANASOVA, Mrs Darinka STANTCHEVA, Mr Ivan POPESCU, Mr Jean HUSS, Mrs Eva GARCÍA PASTOR In the draft recommendation, paragraph 1, replace the words “The situation of national minorities in Vojvodina and of the Romanian ethnic minority in Serbia” with the followng words:”The situation of national minorities in Vojvodina and of the Romanian and Bulgarian ethnic minorities in Serbia”. 2. The Assembly also recommends that the Committee of Ministers and the Serbian authorities consider launching new targeted assistance programmes to support the development of concrete plans of action to promote a spirit of tolerance and intercultural dialogue, and in particular to build the confidence of the minorities in the state institutions and to combat prejudices against minorities that may persist within law enforcement agencies and the judiciary.
Razboi intru Cuvant se revolta: LING– USEALA STA CU PATRIARHUL LA MASA sau OMAGII CONDUCATORULUI IUBIT “Realitatea TV: Traian Băsescu participă astăzi la aniversarea unui an de la întronizarea Patriarhului Daniel Constatam ca infiintarea Ministerului Adevarului, acel minister din lumea totalitara de cosmar a lui Orwell, este o… Realitate (TV) deja, care isi indeplineste cu succes rolul de a falsifica in intregime adevarul si a spune negrului alb si albului negru: “La sfârşitul anului trecut, Patriarhul Daniel a definitivat Statutul Bisericii Ortodoxe Române, noua formă a documentului acordând o putere mai mare credincioşilor şi structurilor bisericeşti locale.” Evident, adevarul este cu totul invers, Statutul fiind o modalitate de a restrange la minimum influenta credinciosilor si a bisericilor locale, si de a creste la maximum autoritatea si influenta institutiei patriarhale!”
Parerea mea este ca avem de a face doar cu o imensa ignoranta. “Jurnalistii de Palat” primesc comunicatele adevaratilor falsificatori ai Adevarului (ii stiti si se stiu si ei prea bine) dupa care le scuipa pe post fara se le mai si ingurgiteze mintal. Asta e!
Insa, dincolo de vrajelile astea, gurile rele imi spun ca strangerea de mana prezidento-patriarhala parafeaza si o intelegere secreta. Basescu a ajuns la Vatican – asa, sa dea bine la CV – doar dupa ce Papa a dat un telefon la Bucuresti. Dar nu la Cotroceni, ci la Patriarhie, la Biserica “Particulara” Romana! Iar de aici, Barba Alba-Neagra l-a trimis pe Barba Rosie la Captain Jack sa-i rupa un bilet de intrare la Castel Gandolfo si un altul la Ofiterul Superior din Portul Malta. Miza este complexa. Tinta: Ortodoxia!
De ce vrea sa-si bata cizmele nemtesti in Gradina Maicii Domnului omul care a sustinut ca Biserica Catolica este “unica si adevarata Biserica a lui Christos” drept-credinciosii stiu prea bine… Smecheria cu invitatia facuta de Base lui Ratzinger (si nu invers) e asa, pentru fatucile Romaniei TV. Deh, gurile rele…
November 9th, 2008 
VR 
Barack Obama nu este interesat de zona Mării Negre. Declaraţia a fost făcută de fostul ambasador al Statelor Unite în România, Alfred Moses. Diplomatul mai crede că relaţiile dintre România şi SUA nu vor mai fi la fel de apropiate ca în perioada administraţiei Bush. Fostul ambasador al Statelor Unite în România, Alfred Moses (foto stanga-dreapta), susţine că zona Mării Negre nu va fi o prioritate a administraţiei Obama. El susţine că spre deosebire de George W. Bush, din echipa lui Obama nu va face parte niciun specialist în această zonă.
Posted in Uncategorized 
Tags: 
