April 30th, 2009 
VR 
14 Mai 2002. Bush semneza Decretul pentru Biometrie
06 Iunie 2006 – altfel scris 06.06.06 – Bush cere instituirea de carduri biometrice.
Posts Tagged ‘Bush’
OPERATIUNEA 911 a adus, rapid, actele biometrice, pentru "securitate". Ce ne va aduce "gripa porcina"? VIDEO
Pantoful curajosului jurnalist anti-Bush a ajuns statuie in orasul lui Saddam
O sculptură in formă de pantof uriaş, un omagiu adus jurnalistului irakian Muntazer al-Zaidi, care a aruncat cu pantofii in fostul preşedinte american George W. Bush, a fost ridicată la Tikrit, la 180 de kilometri nord de Bagdad, oraşul natal al fostului dictator Saddam Hussein, relatează AFP, potrivit NewsIn.
Opera artisului Laith al-Ameri are o inălţime de trei metri şi o lăţime de 2,5 metri şi reprezintă un pantof in care este plantat un arbore. Aceasta a fost instalată marţi in grădina Fundaţiei Copilăriei, o organizaţie irakiană care se ocupă de copiii ai căror părinţi şi-au pierdut viaţa in violenţele care au afectat ţara după invazia americană din martie 2001.
“Sculptura nu este o recuperare politică a vreunui partid sau organizaţii”, a declarat Chaha al-Juburi, directoarea fundaţiei, aplaudată de o mulţime de circa 400 de persoane. “Este un cadou pentru familia lui Muntazer al-Zaidi, un erou a cărui acţiune le-a permis tuturor irakienilor să işi ridice capetele”, a spus şi Faten Massiri, un alt responsabil din fundaţie.
In 14 decembrie, jurnalistul s-a ridicat brusc in timpul unei conferinţe de presă a preşedintelui american şi a premierului irakian Nuri al-Maliki şi a strigat: “Este sărutul de adio, caine”, inainte de a arunca in Bush cu pantofii.
Procesul jurnalistului, aflat incă in inchisoare, urma iniţial să aibă loc in 1 decembrie, dar a fost amanat pe termen nedefinit. (Z.O.)
Sfintele Pasti pentru presedinti
Basescu la Manastirea Cozia, impreuna cu sotia, Maria, si fiicele sale
Tadici in Kosovo, la Manastirea Visoki Decani sarutand moastele Sf Stefan Decanski
Cuplul Putin – Medvedev la Catedrala Mantuitorului din Moscova
Bush, in mare forma, la dineul corespondentilor de presa de la Casa Alba
Video cu Basescu la Cozia: https://www.realitatea.net/playlive2.php?file=/media/video/video_001_00183421_1209277205_00.flv
Sfarsitul Ucrainei si interesul national
Ucraina “democratica” are doar 17 anisori, cat a facut de la destramarea URSS pana azi. Ucraina actuala este un stat artificial construit din bucati indesate de Moscova in fosta Republica Sovietica Socialista Ucraineana. Nu trebuie sa ne spuna Putin asta. Este un fapt istoric, care ne priveste foarte tare. De aceea este normal ca atat situatia rasaritului romanesc, cat si soarta romanilor din aceste provincii sa fie din cand in cand aduse aminte celor care prefera sa inchida ochii in fata adevarului istoric. Cine uita nu merita, spunea Iorga.
Zilele acestea, de dupa Summitul NATO la Bucuresti, atat declaratiile presedintelui rus, Vladimir Putin, cat si cele ale sefului statului roman, Traian Basescu, au involburat apele politice ale Kievul si Chisinaului, starnind reactii pe potriva mai ales din partea vectorilor anti-romani de pe malurile Niprului si Prutului. MAE si Presedintia Ucrainei au dispus “sa fie verificata autenticitatea” afirmatiilor “atribuite” lui Putin la Summitul NATO si aparute, pe surse, in Kommersant si cele ale lui Basescu, fiind amintit si locul unde au aparut pe larg, ziarul ZIUA, un vechi prieten al autoritatilor ucrainene.
“George, tu chiar nu intelegi ca Ucraina nu este stat?”
Continuarea la
https://www.ziua.ro/display.php?data=2008-04-22&id=236457
Posted in Uncategorized 
Tags: Basarabia, Basescu, Bucovina, Bush, Insula Serpilor, Iuscenko, Putin, Romania, Tinutul Herta, Ucraina, ziua 
No Comments »Imblanzirea ursului, de la Ceausescu la Basescu
La masa reusitei Summitului Romaniei au stat, la propriu, joi seara, ONU, Rusia, SUA, NATO si UE. In celebrul cuib al spionilor din perioada interbelica si, apoi, din cea comunista – Athenee Palace – si cu Basescu amfitrion. Trei sunt mostenirile lasate de Ceausescu lui Basescu, in vederea Summitului NATO de la Bucuresti, comentau ieri doi dintre veteranii presei de politica externa romane si ruse, Corneliu Vlad si Veaceslav Samoskin: Palatul Poporului, fara de care nu ar fi avut unde sa se desfasoare Summitul, serviciile secrete puternice, fara de care nu ar fi reusit organizarea Summitului, dar si relatiile proaste romano-sovietice.
Istorice, daca ne amintim de spusele lui Take Ionescu: imperiul rus este dusmanul natural al Romaniei. Vizita lui Putin la Bucuresti aduce si o posibila amagire: tinand cont ca suntem vecini la Marea Neagra, Rusia ar putea deveni, daca nu prietena, cel putin partenera de plaja a Romaniei.
Problemele Bucurestiului, oricum, au ramas aceleasi cu Moscova, de la Tezaurul pierdut si regasit poate doar in maselele de aur ale rusilor, la Basarabia, cu baza militara Transnistria infipta ca sula-n coastele rasaritene ale NATO, SUA si UE. Dupa moartea lui Gheorghe Gheorghiu Dej, in 1965, Ceausescu s-a pregatit temeinic pentru prima sa vizita oficiala in noua sa pozitie, vizita pe care a facut-o, evident, la Kremlin. Cu impertinenta, aproape, Ceausescu a abordat frontal problemele romanesti devenite clasice, Tezaurul, Insula Serpilor etc. Dupa care a venit momentul 1968. Putina lume stie ca relatiile incordate, dar si informatiile aflate in posesia serviciilor secrete romanesti in ce priveste implicarea Rusiei (dar si a SUA) in decapitarea lui Ceausescu aproape il determinasera pe liderul comunist, la ultimul congres PCR din noiembrie 1989, sa condamne Pactul Ribbentrop-Molotov si consecintele sale. Nu a mai apucat, dupa Congres. Ar fi putut sa o faca Basescu…
Continuarea la
Foto: Sorin Lupsa https://www.presidency.ro/
Intalnirea de la Neptun Bush-Base
No comment
Spre Marea Neagra, la o plimbare pe faleza, dupa conferinta de presa
My good friend and adviser on Black Sea…
In asteptarea celor doi
Pregatiri febrile
Ziaristii romani si americani prezenti la Neptun
La TVR, tot PSD…
Masina lui Bush, cu steagul romanesc fluturand, la vila de la Neptun
Pozele – cu exceptia primei, imprumutate de la Jurnalul National – sunt facute cu un I-Phone, cam in countre-jour. C’est la vie…
COMUNICAT DE PRESĂ(2 aprilie 2008)
Declaraţie comună de presă susţinută de preşedintele României, Traian Băsescu, şi preşedintele Statelor Unite ale Americii, George W. Bush
Preşedintele României, Traian Băsescu, s-a întâlnit astăzi, 2 aprilie a.c., la Neptun, cu preşedintele Statelor Unite ale Americii, George W. Bush. La finalul întâlnirii, cei doi şefi de stat au susţinut o conferinţă comună de presă în care au prezentat concluziile convorbirilor.Vă prezentăm integral textul conferinţei de presă:
George W. Bush: “Domnule preşedinte, vă mulţumesc foarte mult pentru ospitalitatea dumneavoastră călduroasă. Laura şi cu mine suntem foarte bucuroşi să fim aici, împreună, cu soţia dumneavoastră, o persoană foarte plăcută. Cred că a fost locul ideal pentru a ne întâlni, într-un loc aşa de frumos. Sunteţi foarte amabil să ne fi invitat aici – de fapt, aşa fac prietenii, mai ales când au o relaţie foarte puternică şi foarte prietenoasă. Vă admir curajul şi capacitatea dumneavoastră de lider. Vreau să vă mulţumesc pentru că ne-aţi găzduit aici, pentru că găzduiţi acest Summit NATO la Bucureşti – este mare lucru. Este interesant că, acum 20 de ani, naţiunile noastre erau separate în Războiul Rece – România era membră a Pactului de la Varşovia şi românii au suferit sub o dictatură foarte crudă. Astăzi, cred că lucrurile s-au schimbat foarte mult. Românii sunt liberi şi suntem aliaţi puternici. Apreciem faptul că sunteţi în NATO şi vă mulţumesc foarte mult pentru contribuţia pe care aţi adus-o Alianţei. Vreau să vă mulţumesc dumneavoastră şi românilor pentru contribuţiile pe care le-aţi avut în Afganistan. Aveţi 600 de militari acolo – poporul afgani este foarte mulţumit, ca şi mine, de prezenţa dumneavoastră. Vreau să vă mulţumesc şi pentru contribuţia cu trupe în Irak. Sunt decizii foarte dure acestea, dar sunt decizii necesare pentru menţinerea păcii. Am discutat dorinţa noastră de a conlucra foarte strâns cu aceste ţări, pentru a le încuraja obţinerea de succese – şi de dragul lor, dar şi de dragul păcii. Apreciez foarte mult discuţiile pe care le-am avut astăzi privind extinderea NATO. România şi SUA au convenit că Alianţa NATO trebuie să continue să fie deschisă către noii aliaţi, care să împărtăşescă valorile, care doresc implementeze reforme, ţări care vor să contribuie la păstrarea securităţii. Pe acest fond, eu cred cu tărie că statele Croaţia, Albania şi Macedonia ar trebui să devină membre depline NATO şi că ar trebui să acordăm MAP Ucrainei şi Georgiei, cât şi foarte mult sprijin cererii Bosniei-Herţegovina şi Muntenegrului pentru Dialog Intensificat în cadrul Alianţei. Şi cred că trebuie să deschidem porţile şi pentru o colaborare mai strânsă cu Serbia. Vă mulţumesc foarte mult pentru sfaturile pe care mi le-aţi dat în legătură cu aceste teme. De asemenea, apreciez calitatea dumneavoastră de lider în zona Mării Negre – probabil, de aceea m-aţi şi invitat aici. Noi împărtăşim preocupările pe care le aveţi privind securitatea, pentru dorinţa dumneavoastră de a ridica rolul acestei zone, pentru efortul financiar pe care l-am făcut pentru Marea Neagră, pentru a întări statul de drept şi guvernarea democratică, în ţările din zonă. Vă mulţumesc foarte mult şi pentru viziunea dumneavoastră despre pieţele economice – ele cresc atunci când încurajăm antreprenorii şi sectorul de business, iar economia română este puternică. De aceea, cred că am pierdut un fond educaţional româno-englez, pentru că aţi avut aşa un mare succes, şi antreprenorii dumneavoastră la fel. Vreau să vă felicit pentru creşterea economică şi pentru viziunea dumneavoastră. Sunt foarte bucuros că am venit aici şi vă mulţumesc din nou – dumneavoastră şi doamnei Băsescu – pentru ospitalitatea dumneavoastră. Am avut un prânz delicios şi, dacă jurnaliştii români nu au gustat încă îngheţata românească, îi îndemn să încerce acest lucru. Vă mulţumesc foarte mult!”
Traian Băsescu:
“În primul rând, domnule preşedinte, doresc să vă mulţumesc că aţi dat curs invitaţiei de a rezerva câteva ore unei vizite pe pământul pe care eu m-am născut, în Dobrogea, la malul Mării Negre. Aşa cum discutam la Washington în 2005 şi 2006, parteneriatul nostru a depăşit de mult faza unui simplu parteneriat militar care să vizeze, în primul rând, securitatea României. Suntem, acum, în faza unui parteneriat care are o foarte puternică şi consistentă componentă economică. După 2005, în România a venit Oracle, în România a venit Smithfield, cu investiţii foarte mari în industria alimentară, în România, iată, zilele trecute a venit Ford. Ceea ce înseamnă că parteneriatul româno-american acoperă, practic, toate valenţele şi noi sperăm în dezvoltarea lui, în continuare. Ţin să vă mulţumesc pentru atenţia pe care administraţia dumneavoastră a dat-o regiunii Mării Negre. Ţin să vă mulţumesc pentru îngrijorările dumneavoastră legate de securitatea din regiunea Mării Negre şi de îngrijorările dumneavoastră legate de nevoia de a garanta democraţia în spaţiul acestei regiuni Mării Negre. De asemenea, domnule preşedinte, vreau să subliniez încrederea pe care Statele Unite au avut-o în Armata Română, prin punerea sub comandă românească a unor efective importante din Afganistan. A fost semnul de încredere pe care ni l-aţi dat şi ştim că, foarte rar, Statele Unite ale Americii îşi pun sub comanda altor ofiţeri militarii. Vă mulţumesc mult! În încheiere, aş dori să subliniez similitudinea de abordări legate de regiunea în care România se află – fie că vorbim de Balcani, fie că vorbim de Ucraina sau Georgia, abordările noastre sunt abordări care vizează în primul rând securitatea României şi a regiunii. Ne bucură faptul că, deşi Statele Unite sunt departe de această zonă, au înţeles îngrijorările noastre, priorităţile noastre şi priorităţile regiunii. Vă mulţumesc mult, domnule preşedinte, că aţi dat curs fără ezitare celor ce le-am stabilit. În acelaşi timp, vreau să vă asigur că România va rămâne o ţară care îşi va respecta toate angajamentele, atât cele legate de relaţia cu NATO şi de relaţia cu Uniunea Europeană, cât şi cele legate de parteneriatul şi relaţia noastră bilaterală. Vă mulţumesc mult!”
Departamentul de Comunicare Publică
Departamentul de Comunicare Publică
02 Aprilie 2008
CIA a sprijinit studentii si preotii ortodocsi din Romania
“Jurnalul National” titreaza, vineri, 8 februarie: “Băsescu, omul Statelor Unite”
intr-un articol scris de Gabi Golea (https://www.jurnalul.ro/articole/116424/basescu-omul-statelor-unite)
ANALIZÅ ● Istoria unei campanii electorale
“Un expert francez în serviciile de informaţii americane susţine, într-un interviu publicat vineri, 1 februarie, de ziarul Izvestia, că Traian Băsescu a fost candidatul sprijinit de SUA în alegerile prezidenţiale din 2004”. Misto! Expertul e Catherine Durandin. Am gasit articolul original prin amabilitatea colegei mele – a mai mica – si cu putin ajutor l-am trecut printr-un program de traducere automata. Il prezint asa, in forma nefinisata, pentru cine e interesat. Atentie pe preotii ortodocsi si pe studenti!
The expert{auditeur} on American special services Katrin Dyuranden:
“Gorbachev was afraid to speak seriously with Bush about Germany “
by Oleg Shevtsov
What is CIA – the tool of imperial politics or the effective mechanism in struggle for freedom of democracy? Êàòðèí Äþðàíäåí, the professor of the Parisian Institute of the international and strategic researches and the author of the sensational books ” Bush’s Dynasty “, ” CIA on war ” and ” CIA – five years in anger “, slightly opens secrets of the American special services, shares data known to it{her} on a hidden circumstance of “velvet” revolutions. With it{her} the Parisian correspondent of “News” Oleg Shevtsov talked.
Question: Why CIA has appeared in deep crisis, having missed on September, 11th?
The answer: All fault have assigned to investigation and Georges Teneta as its{her} director. However Georges Bush’s administration has not lead then personnel cleanings. In fact the top of CIA has agreed to divide{undresse} with the White house the responsibility for preparation and the beginning of operation in Iraq. The basic arguments in favour of intervention – the information on presence at Saddam Hussein of the weapon of mass destruction and data on presence “Àëü-Êàèäû” in Iraq – with a serious stretch have been included by CIA in the report to the congress. But it was soon found out: the given data – “linden”. It became one more impact on reputation of CIA: many brilliant employees, first of all representatives of intellectual elite, have submitted to resignation.
Q: But in fact CIA not for the first time tries to affect{influence} the decision of the country leaders, manipulating conclusions?
A: That’s just the point, that CIA after September, 11th was completely under the control of administration. And under its{her} order has forged data, it is artificial forcing conditions around of Iraq and giving “terrible” arguments for the beginning military actions. As a result the report cost resignations to state secretary Colin Powell who at George Tenet’s stood at it{him} behind a back presence, has publicly declared{announced} presence in Iraq of the weapon of mass destruction. At Bush-younger the role of CIA has been shown to the decision of momentary problems{tasks}, and it any more does not conduct independent tracking of world{global} conditions.
Q: In the work you use original documents of CIA from which the security classification is removed{taken off}…
A: The matter is that earlier I studied{investigated} CIA in the historical plan. I could work in American ñïåöàðõèâàõ. Here I got acquainted with the file about operations of CIA of the last years. I have a solid set of documents which testify to application by employees of the American investigation in 1950th years of narcotic ËÑÄ and tortures at interrogations. And at last, me documents on preparation öýðýóøíèêàìè Gorbachev and Bush-senior meetings at the summit on Malta in 1989 have got.
Q: Also what there was?
A: Gorbachev met Bush by the military ship, and at this time there was a terrible storm. Now I have a full confidence, that your president was absolutely not ready to this summit. Cardinally important event for Soviet Union was discussed: association of Germany. Gorbachev should achieve, that it{she} became neutral. But it{he} has underestimated the partner on negotiations: Bush-senior and the chancellor of Germany Helmut Kohl have already agreed – the incorporated Germany will be included into NATO.
This historical meeting prepared Ãîñäåïîì the USA and, naturally, investigation. The basic emphasis – on a theme of human rights. Infinite lists of persons{faces} which wished to leave the USSR there appeared, sat in camps. There was even a list of the Soviet brides, unsuccessfully tried to marry foreigners. And Bush spoke, insisted, pressed, not stopping. Yes so, that polite Gorbachev during any moment has not sustained: ” But you do not have monopoly for human rights! ” But it has not confused Bush, and it{he} continued to show these lists, not giving{allowing} the Soviet president and a mouth to open. The purpose – ” to not allow to start talking about a neutrality of Germans ” – it has been reached{achieved}.
Q: Eventually Gorbachev has surrendered?
A: it seems to Me, it{he} has begun to panic. On it, actually, also there was a calculation of CIA. In Moscow at that time, in the end of 1989, there was uneasy conditions for Gorbachev. And up to the final decision of a German question remains three weeks. And calculation ðàçâåäóïðàâëåíèÿ, secretary general who has well studied{investigated} character, was under construction that it{he} has been exhausted psychologically and it{he} simply will not have hardness to resist to pressure of the West. Most of all Gorbachev’s to act Francois Mitterand was surprised: it{he} has called back to Bush and has told, that the Soviet leader could not on such agree in any way.
Q: But it is primary in Gorbachev’s intentions did not enter “to hand over” Germany?
A: I have certificates: even leaders of the Western Europe did not expect, that events will develop so quickly. In my opinion, it is the tragical moment in history of the USSR.
Q: you think, what it was possible to force to sign Bush any obligations from NATO?
A: Probably. It is clear, why Russian consider{count}, that them then have deceived. In fact there was an oral arrangement to not place the weapon in territory of former GDR, however about it{her} at once have forgotten. Sharp expansion of NATO has provoked the subsequent collapse{landslide} to the east, ended crash of the Union. If all went more systematically instead of how have arranged the USA, painful{unhealthy} cataclysms in the East Europe would manage to be avoided.
Q: In your books about CIA it is spoken about recruitment by Americans of priests in âîñòî÷íîåâðîïåéñêèõ the countries…
A: I have learned{have found out} This information in 1992 from the interlocutor from the American embassy in Bucharest. It{he} has boasted, that during “democratization” of Romania the American special services operated{worked} through ïîëêîâûõ priests. Investigation had special programs for orthodox fathers in armies. Them instructed how correctly to adjust{set up} flock, to prevent ” blind obedience ” the soldier to unconstitutional orders.
I have been amazed{struck}, how Americans have dexterously guessed to get into the closed environment of Armed forces ×àóøåñêó which then were formed on the basis of a compulsory military service. I do not have data about number of the enlisted{recruited} priests. But the idea has seemed to me extremely original.
Q: When you have started to work with documents of CIA?
A: It is connected with research work across Romania. Studying{investigating} a decline of dictator Chaushesku, I have collided{faced} with very strange facts. For example, Minister of Defence Mircha Pashku was trained in the USA in 1988. And the ambassador of Romania at the United Nations I met earlier in other quality – as the owner of the grant of one American centre of science. Me other members of the “democratic” Romanian government generated after overthrow of a mode have interested also all. It was found out, that the American proteges in it{him} – the majority.
Q: That is the new political elite of Romania almost has not with its full complement passed{has not with its full complement taken place} special training in the USA?
A: Well, maybe, not preparation, but with all from them contact in advance has been come into. And they received instructions is precisely. The policy{politics} of “openness” enabled the USA to form a ruling clique at own discretion. If to take Romania, Bulgaria, even Hungary and to look, that today’s ministers and leading politicians{policies; politics} till 1990th years you receive a curious picture did{made}. Someone has necessarily visited long business trip in the USA, someone has passed{has taken place} the American rates of management under special programs. It was competent work of investigation on selection of the necessary people in the East Europe. Not clearly, why the same is impossible to Americans in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Q: Whom, in your opinion, CIA feels itself – as the tool of imperial politics or the fighter for freedom?
A: For empire “solidity” in realization of the strategic purposes is characteristic. And in the USA it{this} is not present. There different lobbies, opposition, democrats… The Majority of people in CIA with which I communicated, is well ìîòèâèðîâàííûå professionals, for which national interests of the USA above all. Many really trust, that they release{exempt} people from tyranny and dictatorships. Those who feels itself “Ðýìáî”, playing secret wars and plots, least. But business also that problems{tasks} before investigation put financial circles and a military-industrial complex.
Q: And secret currents inside of CIA are?
A: Now inside of investigation there are the parallel structures which are carrying out the certain order. The most disturbing: in operations and special operations “experts{auditeurs}” from practically not private{individual} structures under control to executive authority are used. At deficiency of trust to the government, at absence of the clear purposes war it becomes frequent “dirty”. Bigwigs of the organized crime interfere With it{her}, íàðêîäåëüöû, dealers the weapon – as we see it both in Afghanistan, and in Kosovo.
Q: What do you think of “color” revolutions in territory of the formerUSSR? It too firm ïîñòóïü democracies or the technique tested in the East Europe?
A: As has shown the analysis of events of December, 2004 in Romania, export of revolution can be successful only when there is an internal demand. Change of president Iliesku with the American candidate -Traian Basescu, has passed{has taken place} on hurrah. Those parties{sets}, groups, student’s movements which advanced it{him}, really leaned{based} on the USA. Áýñåñêó till now it is popular in Romania. Yes, really, all Americans have organized. Financing because of ocean went mainly on the organization of student’s demonstrations. I not so well know a situation in Ukraine and in Georgia, but imposing “help” from the outside is usual gives{allows} result if there are objective preconditions. And if they are not present….
What is CIA – the tool of imperial politics or the effective mechanism in struggle for freedom of democracy? Êàòðèí Äþðàíäåí, the professor of the Parisian Institute of the international and strategic researches and the author of the sensational books ” Bush’s Dynasty “, ” CIA on war ” and ” CIA – five years in anger “, slightly opens secrets of the American special services, shares data known to it{her} on a hidden circumstance of “velvet” revolutions. With it{her} the Parisian correspondent of “News” Oleg Shevtsov talked.
Question: Why CIA has appeared in deep crisis, having missed on September, 11th?
The answer: All fault have assigned to investigation and Georges Teneta as its{her} director. However Georges Bush’s administration has not lead then personnel cleanings. In fact the top of CIA has agreed to divide{undresse} with the White house the responsibility for preparation and the beginning of operation in Iraq. The basic arguments in favour of intervention – the information on presence at Saddam Hussein of the weapon of mass destruction and data on presence “Àëü-Êàèäû” in Iraq – with a serious stretch have been included by CIA in the report to the congress. But it was soon found out: the given data – “linden”. It became one more impact on reputation of CIA: many brilliant employees, first of all representatives of intellectual elite, have submitted to resignation.
Q: But in fact CIA not for the first time tries to affect{influence} the decision of the country leaders, manipulating conclusions?
A: That’s just the point, that CIA after September, 11th was completely under the control of administration. And under its{her} order has forged data, it is artificial forcing conditions around of Iraq and giving “terrible” arguments for the beginning military actions. As a result the report cost resignations to state secretary Colin Powell who at George Tenet’s stood at it{him} behind a back presence, has publicly declared{announced} presence in Iraq of the weapon of mass destruction. At Bush-younger the role of CIA has been shown to the decision of momentary problems{tasks}, and it any more does not conduct independent tracking of world{global} conditions.
Q: In the work you use original documents of CIA from which the security classification is removed{taken off}…
A: The matter is that earlier I studied{investigated} CIA in the historical plan. I could work in American ñïåöàðõèâàõ. Here I got acquainted with the file about operations of CIA of the last years. I have a solid set of documents which testify to application by employees of the American investigation in 1950th years of narcotic ËÑÄ and tortures at interrogations. And at last, me documents on preparation öýðýóøíèêàìè Gorbachev and Bush-senior meetings at the summit on Malta in 1989 have got.
Q: Also what there was?
A: Gorbachev met Bush by the military ship, and at this time there was a terrible storm. Now I have a full confidence, that your president was absolutely not ready to this summit. Cardinally important event for Soviet Union was discussed: association of Germany. Gorbachev should achieve, that it{she} became neutral. But it{he} has underestimated the partner on negotiations: Bush-senior and the chancellor of Germany Helmut Kohl have already agreed – the incorporated Germany will be included into NATO.
This historical meeting prepared Ãîñäåïîì the USA and, naturally, investigation. The basic emphasis – on a theme of human rights. Infinite lists of persons{faces} which wished to leave the USSR there appeared, sat in camps. There was even a list of the Soviet brides, unsuccessfully tried to marry foreigners. And Bush spoke, insisted, pressed, not stopping. Yes so, that polite Gorbachev during any moment has not sustained: ” But you do not have monopoly for human rights! ” But it has not confused Bush, and it{he} continued to show these lists, not giving{allowing} the Soviet president and a mouth to open. The purpose – ” to not allow to start talking about a neutrality of Germans ” – it has been reached{achieved}.
Q: Eventually Gorbachev has surrendered?
A: it seems to Me, it{he} has begun to panic. On it, actually, also there was a calculation of CIA. In Moscow at that time, in the end of 1989, there was uneasy conditions for Gorbachev. And up to the final decision of a German question remains three weeks. And calculation ðàçâåäóïðàâëåíèÿ, secretary general who has well studied{investigated} character, was under construction that it{he} has been exhausted psychologically and it{he} simply will not have hardness to resist to pressure of the West. Most of all Gorbachev’s to act Francois Mitterand was surprised: it{he} has called back to Bush and has told, that the Soviet leader could not on such agree in any way.
Q: But it is primary in Gorbachev’s intentions did not enter “to hand over” Germany?
A: I have certificates: even leaders of the Western Europe did not expect, that events will develop so quickly. In my opinion, it is the tragical moment in history of the USSR.
Q: you think, what it was possible to force to sign Bush any obligations from NATO?
A: Probably. It is clear, why Russian consider{count}, that them then have deceived. In fact there was an oral arrangement to not place the weapon in territory of former GDR, however about it{her} at once have forgotten. Sharp expansion of NATO has provoked the subsequent collapse{landslide} to the east, ended crash of the Union. If all went more systematically instead of how have arranged the USA, painful{unhealthy} cataclysms in the East Europe would manage to be avoided.
Q: In your books about CIA it is spoken about recruitment by Americans of priests in âîñòî÷íîåâðîïåéñêèõ the countries…
A: I have learned{have found out} This information in 1992 from the interlocutor from the American embassy in Bucharest. It{he} has boasted, that during “democratization” of Romania the American special services operated{worked} through ïîëêîâûõ priests. Investigation had special programs for orthodox fathers in armies. Them instructed how correctly to adjust{set up} flock, to prevent ” blind obedience ” the soldier to unconstitutional orders.
I have been amazed{struck}, how Americans have dexterously guessed to get into the closed environment of Armed forces ×àóøåñêó which then were formed on the basis of a compulsory military service. I do not have data about number of the enlisted{recruited} priests. But the idea has seemed to me extremely original.
Q: When you have started to work with documents of CIA?
A: It is connected with research work across Romania. Studying{investigating} a decline of dictator Chaushesku, I have collided{faced} with very strange facts. For example, Minister of Defence Mircha Pashku was trained in the USA in 1988. And the ambassador of Romania at the United Nations I met earlier in other quality – as the owner of the grant of one American centre of science. Me other members of the “democratic” Romanian government generated after overthrow of a mode have interested also all. It was found out, that the American proteges in it{him} – the majority.
Q: That is the new political elite of Romania almost has not with its full complement passed{has not with its full complement taken place} special training in the USA?
A: Well, maybe, not preparation, but with all from them contact in advance has been come into. And they received instructions is precisely. The policy{politics} of “openness” enabled the USA to form a ruling clique at own discretion. If to take Romania, Bulgaria, even Hungary and to look, that today’s ministers and leading politicians{policies; politics} till 1990th years you receive a curious picture did{made}. Someone has necessarily visited long business trip in the USA, someone has passed{has taken place} the American rates of management under special programs. It was competent work of investigation on selection of the necessary people in the East Europe. Not clearly, why the same is impossible to Americans in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Q: Whom, in your opinion, CIA feels itself – as the tool of imperial politics or the fighter for freedom?
A: For empire “solidity” in realization of the strategic purposes is characteristic. And in the USA it{this} is not present. There different lobbies, opposition, democrats… The Majority of people in CIA with which I communicated, is well ìîòèâèðîâàííûå professionals, for which national interests of the USA above all. Many really trust, that they release{exempt} people from tyranny and dictatorships. Those who feels itself “Ðýìáî”, playing secret wars and plots, least. But business also that problems{tasks} before investigation put financial circles and a military-industrial complex.
Q: And secret currents inside of CIA are?
A: Now inside of investigation there are the parallel structures which are carrying out the certain order. The most disturbing: in operations and special operations “experts{auditeurs}” from practically not private{individual} structures under control to executive authority are used. At deficiency of trust to the government, at absence of the clear purposes war it becomes frequent “dirty”. Bigwigs of the organized crime interfere With it{her}, íàðêîäåëüöû, dealers the weapon – as we see it both in Afghanistan, and in Kosovo.
Q: What do you think of “color” revolutions in territory of the formerUSSR? It too firm ïîñòóïü democracies or the technique tested in the East Europe?
A: As has shown the analysis of events of December, 2004 in Romania, export of revolution can be successful only when there is an internal demand. Change of president Iliesku with the American candidate -Traian Basescu, has passed{has taken place} on hurrah. Those parties{sets}, groups, student’s movements which advanced it{him}, really leaned{based} on the USA. Áýñåñêó till now it is popular in Romania. Yes, really, all Americans have organized. Financing because of ocean went mainly on the organization of student’s demonstrations. I not so well know a situation in Ukraine and in Georgia, but imposing “help” from the outside is usual gives{allows} result if there are objective preconditions. And if they are not present….
the script varies – and the result can be unexpected.
