Posts Tagged ‘Ungaria’

Fundatia Gojdu pregateste un proces cu Ungaria

EXCLUSIV: Sibiu, 10 mar /Rompres/ – Presedintele Fundatiei Gojdu, IPS Laurentiu Streza, mitropolitul Ardealului, a declarat luni, pentru ROMPRES, ca incearca sa obtina sustinerea statului roman pentru a intenta un proces statului ungar, in vederea recuperarii mostenirii lui Emanuil Gojdu.

‘Actiunea va fi impreuna cu statul roman impotriva statului ungar. (…) Urmatorul pas va fi acela al unei actiuni juridice, care nu stiu cum ar trebui facuta. Eu nu actionez in numele mitropoliei, ci in numele fundatiei. Ne trebuie o casa de avocatura care sa preia cazul respectiv’, a precizat mitropolitul Ardealului.

El este de parere ca nu va fi un proces usor, adaugand ca Fundatia Gojdu nu are, in prezent, banii necesari pentru a-si permite un asemenea demers. PS Laurentiu Streza spera sa primeasca sprijinul unor sponsori sau sa incheie o intelegere cu o casa de avocatura, care, in caz de castig, sa obtina un procent din suma recuperata. ‘Poate ca vom provoca si alti sponsori. S-ar putea sa gasim aici oameni binevoitori, care ne ajuta, ne consiliaza, ne fac actele si sa incercam cu sume cat mai mici. Daca incercam sa evaluam, costurile sunt mari. Poate gasim altceva, din suma respectiva sa isi asume cineva ca preia un procent in caz de castig. Daca statul roman ne sta alaturi, vom face actiunea impotriva celor care detin acum mostenirea, statul ungar. Daca statul roman nu ne sta alaturi, atunci noi chemam statul alaturi de noi’, a spus presedintele Fundatiei Gojdu.

Potrivit lui IPS Laurentiu Streza, Fundatia Gojdu cu sediul la Sibiu ar trebui sa recupereze cateva miliarde de euro, chiar daca o parte din cele opt cladiri ale lui Gojdu din centrul Budapestei au fost deja instrainate. Totodata, IPS Streza a spus ca Emanuil Gojdu si-a facut o planificare ca, din veniturile acestei mosteniri, pana in 2050, sa poata subventiona burse pentru romanii ortodocsi din Ardeal si Ungaria.’Nu avem iluzia ca vom primi inapoi toate cladirile acelea, pentru ca ele sunt intr-un proces, daca nu s-ar fi si terminat procesul, de instrainare. nsa valoarea lor oricand se poate calcula. Apoi au fost si fonduri in banca, oricand se pot dovedi. Ceea ce s-a incercat din punct de vedere valoric sa se puna la temelia noii fundatii este o suma derizorie de rasul lumii, 200.000 de euro statul roman, 200.000 de euro statul maghiar. Cu 400.000 de euro sa inlocuiesti o mostenire care are milioane de euro, daca nu chiar miliarde’, a spus IPS Laurentiu Streza.

Fundatia Gojdu vrea sa intenteze un proces statului vecin in baza unui acord semnat intre statul roman si cel ungar in urma cu mai bine de 70 de ani.’Ramane insa in vigoare acordul din 1937 care a fost aprobat si de statul roman si de statul ungar. §i, in conformitate cu acest acord, noi avem dreptul sa ne cerem mostenirea inapoi’, a adaugat mitropolitul Ardealului.

Senatorii au respins luni, 3 martie, cu 89 de voturi si doua abtineri, Ordonanta de Urgenta a Guvernului pentru ratificarea acordului dintre Guvernul Romaniei si cel al Ungariei privind infiintarea Fundatiei publice romano-ungare Gojdu. Senatul s-a raliat, astfel, punctului de vedere adoptat de Camera Deputatilor.n Ordonanta de Urgenta a Guvernului se precizeaza ca prin acordul semnat la Bucuresti pe 20 octombrie 2005 se infiinteaza Fundatia romano-ungara Gojdu, armonizandu-se prevederile testamentare ale marelui mecena Emanuil Gojdu cu realitatile contemporane si cu dorinta celor doua guverne ca demersul sa fie unul comun. Ordonanta era necesara ca baza legala pentru finantarea fundatiei din fonduri alocate MAE.

In 2005, Guvernul Tariceanu – prin intermediul minstrului de externe de la acea data, Mihai Razvan Ungureanu -, incheie cu guvernul ungar un act juridic prin care Patrimoniul este re-nationalizat, Fundatia Gojdu (in varianta gandita de Emanuil Gojdu) este desfiintata, iar testamentul ‘anulat’. Acest acord a starnit si nemultumirea Bisericii Ortodoxe Romane.

In prezent, exista o singura fundatie Gojdu, cea condusa de mitropolitul Ardealului. ‘Am eliminat acea actiunea care ne excludea pe noi din ecuatie. n momentul in care s-ar fi aprobat ordonanta de guvern si fundatia lua fiinta, se desfiinta fundatia de la Sibiu automat. Am salvat fundatia de la Sibiu, care este mostenitoarea de drept’, a explicat IPS Laurentiu Streza.

Mitropolitul Ardealului a mai incercat sa intenteze o actiune in instanta pentru recuperarea mostenirii Gojdu, in noiembrie 2007, cand la Sibiu, unde este sediul fundatiei, a avut loc sedinta comuna a guvernelor roman si ungar. Mitropolitul a declarat atunci, pentru ROMPRES, ca va da in judecata Guvernul Romaniei, daca nu se va ajunge la o intelegere care sa apere interesele fundatiei.

Plecat din tara, la Viena, mitropolitul nu s-a mai intalnit in noiembrie 2007, la Sibiu, cu premierul Calin Popescu Tariceanu.

Presa ungara a semnalat deja ca Ungaria si Romania sunt in postura de a lua de la capat negocierile in privinta mostenirii Gojdu, dupa ce Senatul de la Bucuresti a refuzat sa recunoasca acordul dintre cele doua tari semnat la prima sedinta comuna a celor doua guverne, in octombrie 2005, privind infiintarea Fundatiei publice romano-ungare Gojdu, comenteaza Nepszabadsag.

Fundatia Gojdu este recunoscuta de Biserica Ortodoxa Romana ca ‘singura mostenitoare legala’ a bunurilor patrimoniale care au apartinut avocatului Emanuil Gojdu.

Emanuil Gojdu, personalitate a intelectualitatii romane transilvanene din secolul al XIX-lea, s-a nascut la Oradea, la 9 februarie 1802, intr-o familie de origine macedo-romana. Isi incheie studiile de drept la Budapesta, devenind, in scurt timp, unul dintre cei mai straluciti avocati din Imperiul Austro-Ungar. Prin testamentul intocmit la 4 noiembrie 1869, Emanuil Gojdu stabileste ca o mare parte a averii sale sa fie administrata de o fundatie care sa-i poarte numele.Incepand cu anul 1996, incepe sa functioneze la Sibiu Fundatia Gojdu, declarata continuatoarea Fundatiei Gojdu din perioada interbelica si proprietarul de drept al bunurilor Fundatiei Gojdu.

Manifestarile culturale organizate de Fundatia Gojdu, menite sa reinvie spiritul lui Emanuil Gojdu, au beneficiat de sprijinul Guvernului Romaniei si al cercurilor academice din Romania. Prin Hotararea Guvernului nr. 1471/11 decembrie 2003, publicata in Monitorul Oficial nr. 171/19 decembrie 2003, Fundatia Gojdu este declarata de utilitate publica. ROMPRES (Isabela Paulescu)

Romania libera scria in decembrie anul trecut ca, la Budapesta, Curtile Gojdu au fost deja ocupate:

Kosovo si purificarea etnica in Romania anului 2008

Un editorial despre pozitia Academiei Romane privind paralela Kosovo-Tinutul Secuiesc (ajunsa cu greu in noua presa de Sarindar…)

Cand vorbeste Vladimir Putin de Romania nu poate fi ceva de bine. Din pacate. Cu ceva timp in urma, seful noului imperiu rus avertiza Europa si, in special, Romania, asupra declansarii unor reactii etnice in lant in urma consacrarii precedentului Kosovo. Transilvania ocupa un loc de frunte intre conflictele enumerate de Putin, omul de stat rus cel mai rasarit in actualul spatiu politic european.
Ieri, “The man of the Year 2007”, conform Time, a emis ultimul sau avertisment inainte de prima noapte de razboi in Kosovo: “vom reactiona printr-un comportament fata de partenerii nostri astfel incat sa ne asiguram securitatea – avem deja un plan pregatit si stim ce vom face”. Dar Romania? Are vreun plan, stie ce va face?
Daca maine (sau poimaine) fostii comandanti ai gherilei teroriste UCK vor proclama independenta Kosovo, Romania, conform declaratiilor presedintelui, va respinge fara echivoc acest act unilateral. Conform declaratiilor ministrului de Externe, Adrian Cioroianu, Romania “nu se va opune independentei”. In tot cazul, pentru romani si Romania va fi rau, chiar daca institutiile statului “au uitat” sa avertizeze natiunea, conform legii, asupra consecintelor reluarii conflictului din Kosovo.
Prezent la Bruxelles, pentru o recapitulare impreuna cu oficialii NATO a temelor summitului de la Bucuresti, presedintele Traian Basescu a sustinut si o conferinta, la Fundatia George Marshall, unde a abordat deschis tema Kosovo. Euro-extremistul UDMR Szogor Csaba, care militeaza deschis pentru autonomia teritoriala a ungurilor din Romania, nu a pierdut ocazia sa-l interogheze pe Basescu in cadru public asupra problematicii “transilvanene”. El l-a intrebat pe Basescu daca este de parere ca, intr-un eventual precedent Kosovo, “minoritatea maghiara din Romania ar putea reprezenta o amenintare”. Basescu a raspuns scurt ca minoritatea maghiara nu reprezinta o amenintare pentru Romania pentru ca exista o Constitutie si exista institutii care sa o apere. Oare? Unii zic ca nici nu ar mai avea ce sa apere Constitutia si organele statului, pentru ca in “Tinutul Secuiesc” autonomia deja fiinteaza iar romanii din Harghita si Covasna sunt purificati etnic
Intr-o luare de pozitie fara precedent, Academia Romana a emis zilele trecute un comunicat oficial – prin Institutul sau de Sociologie si Centrul pentru Studii in Probleme Etnice al Academiei Romane -, ignorat, evident, de presa de Dambovita. Academia tragea un semnal de alarma in legatura cu “situatia de o gravitate exceptionala a comunitatii romanilor din judetele Harghita si Covasna, in contextul politic intern si international actual”. Cercetatorii Academiei Romane au avut in vedere “in special utilizarea fortata a situatiei din Kosovo ca si precedent pentru Romania de catre inalti oficiali straini si lideri ai minoritatii maghiare din Romania”. Este adevarat. Recent, parlamentari ai Ungariei au anuntat ca vor urmari “cu cea mai mare atentie” evolutia situatiei din Kosovo, pentru a o putea folosi ca precedent pentru “membrii natiunii maghiare din jurul granitelor”.
In cele doua judete din mijlocul Romaniei se produce – sub ochii nostri larg inchisi – un fenomen antieuropean de enclavizare nemaiintalnit in Europa. Comunitatea romaneasca se regaseste segregata dupa principii medievale in propria tara – accesul romanilor la locurile de munca, la decizii si la resurse financiare fiind restrictionat de 18 ani de dictatura etnocratica a formatiunilor politice maghiare. Academia afirma ca opinia publica nu cunoaste ca in prezent judetele Harghita si Covasna sunt supuse unui proces constant de epurare etnica. Ca limba romana, ca limba oficiala a statului roman, a fost eliminata din spatiul public. Ca agravarea situatiei si recrudescenta demersurilor separatiste sunt incurajate de complicitati politico-economice transpartinice si de lipsa de reactie a institutiilor statului, prizoniere ori ale complicitatilor respective, ori ale incapacitatii de gestionare a unor situatii care vizeaza siguranta nationala. Ca diminuarea dincolo de pragul critic a sentimentului de solidaritate colectiva si a interesului national duce la disolutia statului. La “precedentul Kosovo”.
Comentarii interesante la
https://www.ziua.ro/display.php?data=2008-02-15&id=233228
De asemenea, de remarcat interesul cu care LA Times scrie de Garda Maghiara
https://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-guard13feb13,0,253242.story
Foto stanga: Comandantul-premier Hashim Thaci in mijlocul garzilor albaneze UCK-KLA
Foto dreapta: ON THE MARCH: Members of the Hungarian Guard parade over the weekend in downtown Budapest. The guards wear uniforms reminiscent of the Arrow Cross, the World War II fascist militia in Hungary that worked with the Nazis and was responsible for or assisted in the slaughter of tens of thousands of Jews. LA Times

Bulgaria si Ungaria, cai troieni ai KGB/GRU in NATO iar Ucraina viitor magar troian

Ceea ce scrie ZIUA si subsemnatul 🙂 de cativa ani buni, inclusiv in ce priveste scurgerile de info de la NATO la Moscova, adevereste azi presa occidentala de varf, respectiv IHT. Dar ceea ce nu au luat in calcul inca este ca Ucraina urmeaza sa fie viitorul magar troian al KGB/GRU in NATO.

Chiar astazi, cand se semneaza la Viena un nou contract pentru Nabucco, iata cu Ungaria a anuntat ca este interesata (normal) in South Stream – “conducta aurie” a lui Putin.

Mai jos, nota ZIUA si articolul original din IHT.

Credibilitatea Bulgariei si Ungariei in NATO a inceput sa fie pusa la indoiala, informeaza presa occidentala.
Dupa semnarea unui tratat cu Rusia care saboteaza proiectul UE al gazoductului Nabucco, Bulgaria a fost acuzata ca transmite rusilor secrete NATO. “Pot pune pariu ca orice am impartasit cu bulgarii in cadrul NATO s-a dus direct la Moscova”, a declarat pentru New York Times un oficial NATO care a preferat sa-si pastreze anonimatul. Pe de alta parte, noul sef al serviciilor secrete ungare, care a fost instruit timp de sase ani la Academia KGB din Moscova, a devenit director al Comisiei de Informatii a NATO, initiativa perceputa de diplomati ca o posibila compromitere a securitatii aliantei, scrie International Herald Tribune, preluat de Mediafax.

New NATO intelligence chief was trained by KGB
By Judy Dempsey – International Herald Tribune
Published: February 3, 2008

BERLIN: The new chief of the Hungarian secret services, who spent six years at the KGB’s academy in Moscow during the 1980s, has become chairman of NATO’s intelligence committee, a development that diplomats said could compromise the security of the alliance.
Sandor Laborc, 49, was personally chosen by Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany of Hungary as director of the country’s counterintelligence National Security Office in December, after a bitter dispute between the governing coalition led by the Socialists – the former Communists – and the main opposition party, Fidesz.
Laborc, a former Communist who was trained at the KGB’s Dzerzhinsky Academy from 1983 to 1989, according to members of the national security committee in the Hungarian Parliament, had failed to win support from that committee, which oversees such appointments.
Despite that, Gyurcsany and Gyorgy Szilvasy, the minister responsible for the intelligence services, pushed through the appointment.
“A decision by the National Security Committee has no binding effect,” Gyurcsany’s office said in a statement issued in response to several written questions about Laborc from the International Herald Tribune. “Gyorgy Szilvasy had the right to make a decision in his own capacity and advise the prime minister. He justified the recommendation by introducing General Laborc as someone with unquestioned professional credentials.”
Soon after his appointment, Laborc took over the chairmanship of NATO’s special committee dealing with a wide range of intelligence issues, a rotating post that is held for a year and which fell to Hungary last month, alliance officials confirmed Friday.
The committee, whose main task is to analyze and share intelligence, includes all of the secret service chiefs of NATO countries, who meet several times a year.
Several NATO delegations, including the United States, whose ambassador was asked several times to comment on Laborc’s appointment, declined to do so.
James Appathurai, a NATO spokesman, said, “We do not comment on personnel appointments or intelligence issues.”
Some delegations said they had not been aware of Laborc’s biography. His short curriculum vitae posted on the Hungarian security service’s official Web site makes no mention of his time spent in Moscow. His past came to light when Szilvasy proposed him for the top intelligence job last autumn.
NATO diplomats who did agree to discuss the appointment insisted on anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter. They said that even if they had reservations about Laborc, they were in no position to block his appointment.
“NATO makes decisions on the basis of consensus,” said a senior diplomat from an East European country. “If we had questioned this appointment then we would have to go further up to the top, in this case the Hungarian prime minister, to ask him about Laborc’s past.”
Another diplomat, from a Western country, said, “It would have taken one phone call by the U.S. ambassador to NATO to stop this appointment. It would have been a signal to other countries which might think they can still get away with this.”
In its statement, Gyurcsany’s office said: “Not a single ambassador protested. Through diplomatic channels we received information that our partners are satisfied with the development of interagency cooperation.”
In practice, Laborc’s appointment means that some NATO countries will be much more wary about sharing sensitive intelligence.
“Here we have a person who was trained by the KGB. I cannot assume that he has changed that much in his attitudes,” said another NATO diplomat, predicting that several important NATO countries would hold back on sharing intelligence. “NATO, it must be said, is a very leaky organization,” the diplomat added.
Indeed, NATO has been plagued with leaks. Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic joined the alliance in 1999, and the rest of the former Warsaw Pact countries in 2004. After that expansion, military attachés from the Bulgarian delegation did not receive clearance to have access to a certain level of intelligence material.
“You could bet that anything we shared with Bulgaria inside NATO went straight to Moscow ,” said another senior Western European diplomat. “The old Communist nomenklatura and secret services is still around in Romania and Bulgaria. But I must say the case of Hungary is very, very disappointing.”
Earlier, in the spring of 1999 when NATO was selecting bombing targets in its war to stop Serbian repression of ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, Greece, a member of NATO and the European Union but an ally of Serbia during the Balkan wars of the 1990s, repeatedly leaked alliance plans to Belgrade, NATO diplomats said Friday.
In Hungary itself , Laborc’s appointment has deepened the mistrust and polarization between the governing Socialists and the Fidesz opposition because of the way the prime minister by-passed the Parliament’s national security committee.

Although the committee’s decision is not constitutionally binding, such committees have served as important instruments of democratic accountability since 1990, when the Communists were removed from power in Hungary.
Moreover, until 2002 when the Socialists won the parliamentary elections, any Hungarian official who had served for more than a year in Moscow could not, for security reasons, be appointed to positions higher than a department head.
“At stake is the fundamental regard for the rule of law,” said Janos Martonyi, a former Hungarian foreign minister and Fidesz supporter. After a five-hour debate by the national security committee in late November, Laborc failed to win a majority of the 11 votes. No other candidate was offered by the government. The opposition declined to put forward a candidate.
Fidesz claims that Gyurcsany, a former Communist youth leader turned millionaire who has close ties to President Vladimir Putin of Russia, has been politicizing the secret services for domestic reasons in order to keep track of the opposition, the media and trade unions.
The opposition also has criticzed Gyurcsany for trying to push through austerity measures without public consultation or democratic accountability.
It has challenged the security services’ use of live ammunition against mostly peaceful demonstrators during protests in September 2006.
The protests had been set off by a leak of Gyurcsany’s speech to party supporters, soon after the spring 2006 elections, in which he said the party had lied “day and night” about the miserable state of the economy in order to win.
Zsolt Nemeth, chairman of the Parliament’s foreign affairs committee and a leading member of Fidesz, said it was “a great shame what is happening to the idea of democratic accountability.”
He said the two biggest concerns over the Laborc appointment were that he would replace the young professionals who entered the services during the 1990s and bring back people loyal to Gyurcsany.
“Above all, our concern is that the security services will be become politicized and be used for domestic politics,” he added.
Peter Balazs, an economics professor at Central European University in Budapest and a supporter of the government, dismissed Fidesz’s criticisms.
“Much has changed in Hungary since Laborc’s time spent in Moscow over 20 years ago,” he said. “This is all about internal politics. Just because someone was in Moscow during the 1980s, I don’t think that we should sack anybody after 20 years.”
Besides the opposition, the United States and Britain are concerned about Gyurcsany’s relations with Putin, according to British diplomats in London.
Last year, Gyurcsany publicly supported Russia’s plans to build the South Stream pipeline that will compete with the EU project known as Nabucco, which is intended to weaken Europe’s dependence on Russian gas imports.
British diplomats, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that Gyurcsany had changed tack under American and British pressure. Then last December, during a meeting of the Hungarian and Russian cabinets in Budapest, Gyurcsany came out again in support of the South Stream project.

Powered by WordPress

toateBlogurile.ro

customizable counter
Blog din Moldova