Dupa cum probabil unii dintre Dvs va mai amintiti, in cursul anului 2006, mai precis in luna iulie, sub numarul P/2865/06/13.07.2006 Asociatia Civic Media a depus spre cercetarea CNSAS o lista consistenta de circa 300 de jurnalisti, formatori de opinie si analisti din presa centrala precum si membri ai unor organizatii neguvernamentale. Am considerat ca venim in intampinarea atributiilor si misiunii CNSAS cat si a aspiratiilor noii Romanii, membra a Uniunii Europene si a NATO, in vederea eliberarii de un trecut mult prea incarcat. La data de 20.07.2006 am revenit cu o completare la operatiunea supranumita “Voci curate” – si derulata simultan si eficient in Bulgaria de care o organizatie partenera – adaugand, la cererea colegilor nostri din provincie, si o lista suplimentara de jurnalisti, din intreaga tara.
Inca de la bun inceput am fost acuzati – evident de catre multi dintre cei aflati pe lista depusa – ca vrem sa impiedicam activitatea CNSAS de deconspirare a politicienilor. Drept urmare nu am insistat asupra urgentarii rezolvarii acestei cereri, asteptand, cu rabdare. Cu toate acestea, de-a lungul perioadei scurse am avut mirarea sa constatam ca alte categorii sociale, aflate cu mult dupa litera fixata jurnalistilor in cadrul prioritatilor CNSAS, beneficiaza de o atentie exagerata (dam ca exemplu ierarhii, pana la preoti, aflati si in noua OG pe lista in jos, respectiv la litera “u” spre deosebire de jurnalisti, aflati la litera “p”).
Iata ca vin noi alegeri si CNSAS va avea din nou de lucru cu motoarele duduind. Cu toate acestea, nici dupa doi ani de zile, formatorii de opinie, cei care imping electoratul in directii politice anume, nu sunt deconspirati sau, dimpotriva, exonerati de colaborarea cu Securitate sau alte servicii secrete de sorginte totalitarista, cum ar fi AVO, STASI sau KGB.
Pe toata aceasta perioada, informarile si Deciziile privind lista “Voci curate” au venit sporadic, in ciuda asigurarilor regulate facute de Domniile Voastre. Iar in ultima perioada s-au intrerupt complet. Per total consideram ca, desi termenul legal a expirat de cateva zeci de ori, nici 10% din cerere nu a fost satisfacut, numele “grele” din lista, formatorii cei mai importanti, fiind oricum ca si nevazuti. Pentru a evita insa orice neintelegere va rugam sa faceti si dvs acest bilant si sa ni-l trimiteti insotit de Deciziile Colegiului CNSAS pentru a putea confrunta rezultatele: cele primite cu cele trimise. Avem, oricum, Decizii interesante.
In consecinta va solicitam sa urgentati si bilantul si definitivarea cererii si intr-un moment considerat proxim si pentru Dvs sa prezentam – daca doriti, chiar impreuna – opiniei publice cat si, evident, jurnalistilor si oengistilor, adevarul despre trecutul lor.
Asociatia Cadrelor Militare in Rezerva si in Retragere din Serviciul de Informatii Externe a decis anul acesta ca spionii romani au dreptul si chiar si obligatia sa vorbeasca, pe intelesul tuturor, despre probleme sensibile ale tarii, atata timp cat amintirile lor nu afecteaza siguranta nationala a Romaniei. Asa ca s-au apucat sa scrie. Si sa publice.Analizele fostilor spioni sunt cuprinse intr-o revista de circuit intern ajunsa acum la al treilea numar: “Persicop”. Pentru ca ZIUA a demonstrat o atentie speciala fata de problematica retelelor Kominternului, ale KGB si GRU in Romania, ofiterii de informatii in rezerva si in retragere ne-au pus la dispozitie, in exclusivitate, Dosarul special realizat de “Periscop”la 40 de ani de la invadarea Cehoslovaciei de catre trupele Armatei Rosii precedate de agentii serviciilor speciale sovietice, care nu au ezitat sa ucida pe loc ofiterii de contrainformatii cehi si slovaci care le supravegheau activitatea. Activitatea “Periscop”-ului este remarcabila, dupa cum o dovedesc si amintirile de pe teren ale veteranului care publica sub numele de V. D. Fulger – fost sef, printre altele, al colectivului Asia-Pacific – despre serviciile de informatii romanesti si consilierii sovietici. La fel, analiza lui Mircea Iordanescu despre interventia militara din Cehoslovacia. Publicam astazi doar cateva extrase din Dosarul DIE. Generalul Doicaru: “Nu mai dati nimic rusilor” Continuarea la ZIUA: Spionii romani rup tacerea
Foto: Fugarul Ion Mihai Pacepa, generalul Nicolae Doicaru, seful DIE , si Ion Stanescu, presedintele Consiliului Securitatii Statului
PS: Astazi am niste subiecte foarte haioase, cu plagiatori, ziaristi, securisti si spioni de prin Guvern. Sper sa-mi fac timp se le pun aici… PPS: Trebuie sa multumesc cititorilor mei de pe acest blog care ma tin la curent cu ce-mi mai scapa si mie. Dau nu un suc ci un must, ca a venit vremea recoltei!
Un avion Boeing-737 al companiei Aeroflot s-a prăbuşit ieri noaptea în apropiere de oraşul rus Perm, din Munţii Ural, provocând moartea a 88 de persoane, a anunţat compania aeriană duminică. Printre pasageri se aflau şi 21 de străini, informeaza Mediafax. “Aparatul Boeing 737 transporta 82 de pasageri, dintre care şapte copii, şi şase membri ai echipajului. Toate persoanele aflate la bord au murit”, a anunţat Aeroflot într-un comunicat. Potrivit agenţiei Interfax, nu este exclus ca accidentul să fi fost provocat de un factor uman, unul dintre controlorii aerieni menţionând un comportament “inadecvat” al pilotului avionului. “Avea un comportament inadecvat. Nu respecta ordinele. Poate că se întâmpla ceva, dar nu a vrut să spună”, a declarat el pentru postul rusesc de televiziune Pervi Kanal.
Conform unor martori oculari, avionul a inceput sa arda din aer, inainte de a se prabusi. “Arata ca o cometa”, este citat un martor pe forumul in limba engleza al Pravda.ru.
Presa europeana nu a observat inca faptul ca la bord se afla si un personaj important: generalul-colonel Ghenadi Troshev, fost comandant al Districtului Militar al Caucazului de Nord, considerat si unul dintre satrapii rusi ai razboaielor din Cecenia. Nascut in Berlinul de Est in 1947 (va imaginati cu ce se ocupau parintii lui) el si-a petrecut copilaria in comunitatea rusa din capitala Ceceniei. Tot Cecenia l-a facut, in 1999, “Erou al Rusiei”, prin distinctia oferita personal de Boris Eltin. Trushev este cunoscut si pentru afirmatiile sale ca orasul Groznii ar trebui sa ramana in ruine ca sa inteleaga mai bine ceceni ce li se poate intampla. Tot el a propus ca militantii ceceni prinsi sa fie executati in piata centrala din Groznii. Insa nu asta a deranjat Moscova, ci mai degraba faptul ca Troshev facea parte din garda veche militara care isi arata adeseori opozitia publica fata de faptul ca politicienii Kremlinului au lasat ca Rusia sa fie “incercuita” de baze ale Americii in Asia si, ulterior, in zona Marii Negre.
Ghenadi Troshev a intrat in 2003 in coliziune cu Serghei Ivanov, ministrul Apararii Federatiei si amic de KGB cu Vladimir Putin. El a refuzat sa accepte o indepartare din Cecenia in Siberia fiind imediat eliberat din functie de Putin. La scurt timp – la fel ca si un al camarad de arme de-al sau din Cecenia, generalul Alexsandr Lebed, cunoscut la noi pentru activitatea sa din Transnistria – Troshev si-a anuntat intrarea in politica cu pretentia de a candida la presedintia Rusiei. Iata ca Trushev a sfarsit la fel ca si Lebed, care a murit intr-un accident de elicopter cu 21 de oameni la bord in regiunea Krasnoirask din Siberia, unde ajunsese guvernator.
Se pare ca ceea ce a deranjat si mai tare KGB (FSB) este faptul ca noul presedinte Dmitri Medvedev a decis sa-l foloseasca pe Trushev drept consilier in probleme militare si de siguranta nationala. Catastrofele aviatice constituie o practica curenta si facila a serviciilor secrete de a scapa “natural” de incomozi, fara a lasa nici o urma. Este de vazut si cu cine se mai afla generalul, care, oficial, se ducea la o competitie de arte martiale.
Generalul Ion Stanescu despre agentii NKVD-KGB-GRu din Romania, inclusiv tatal lui Vladimir Tismaneanu si tatal lui Petre Roman
Fostul presedinte al Consiliului Securitatii Statului, generalul Ion Stanescu, dezvaluie planurile lui Ceausescu in momentul invaziei sovietice din Cehoslovacia
Generalul Ion Stanescu, fost presedinte al Consiliului Securitatii Statului in perioada 1968-1972, face afirmatii extraordinare intr-un interviu acordat in exclusivitate ziarului ZIUA la 40 de ani de la reactia categorica a Romania la invazia sovietica din Cehoslovacia. Generalul Stanescu mai sustine ca in anul 1968 era programata si invadarea Romaniei. Timp de doua saptamani statul roman a fost in alerta generala. Tancurile rusesti s-au retras de la granita Romaniei cu RSS Moldoveneasca abia dupa 4 septembrie. Generalul arata ca momentul 1968 a fost culminant si pentru procesul de dekaghebizare a organelor statului roman inceput de Gheorghiu Dej inca din anul 1963 cand s-a hotarat infiintarea unitatii speciale anti-KGB, STASI si AVO UM 0110. Numita initial “Grupa 20”, urmasa unitatii 0110 in SRI purta indicativul “Z” si a fost recent desfiintata. Generalul Stanescu ne ofera si o lista a spionilor sovietici in Romania carora li s-a pus in vedere sa-si inceteze activitatea anti-romaneasca. Printre cele circa 200 de persoane vizate se aflau si tatal lui Vladimir Tismaneanu, agentul Leon Tismenitki si tatal lui Petre Roman, Walter Ernest Neulander. Generalul Ion Stanescu s-a ocupat de Tismenitki, si Vasile Patilinet, seful sectiei militare, de Walter Roman. Ca o alta nota biografica, generalul Stanescu este si cel care l-a incadrat pe Virgil Magureanu in Securitate, in 1972. 21 august 1968 a constituit momentul-cheie in care Romania s-a rupt de URSS si politica bolsevica represiva. Dar acesta a fost anticipat si de alte acte ale statului, printre care si eliberarea detinutilor politici. Puteti sa le amintiti? ZIUA: “Ii primeam pe rusi cu foc de arma”
Stefan Andrei: A fost o perioada lunga in care eram controlati cu totul de sovietici. Prin consilieri, prin agentii lor. De exemplu: Tismaneanu, Leonte,”Ciungul”, cum ii ziceam noi, ca se lauda ca pierduse o mana pe cand era in brigazile teroriste bolsevice contra Spaniei, altii ziceau ca a cazut beat din tren… Era un om rau, meschin si invidios. Un om urat. L-am cunoscut prin 1956. Era agent sovietic, NKVD. Dupa vizita lui Hrusciov noi l-am chemat si l-am avertizat sa termine cu spionajul. Nu ne-am atins de agentii sovietici pana prin anii ’60. Brucan, de exemplu, si alti tineri evrei, era agent sovietic din timpul razboiului, in Reteaua lui Calmanovici, cel care a construit si Ambasada URSS la Bucuresti. O stiu direct de la Ceausescu. Si Tismaneanu era printre ei. Ei bine, Ceausescu a primit sarcina sa ridice problema lor in fata conducerii PCUS. Si i-a zis lui Hrusciov, inainte de momentul ’68, la vizita acestuia la Bucuresti: “tovarase, noi promitem sa va informam, mai aveti si consilieri sovietici dar va rugam sa terminati cu agentii dintre noi”. Si-atunci Hrusciov i-a zis: “Pai considerati ca n-avem nici un agent la voi. Nici in China n-avem…” Si asta ne-a dat noua dezlegare sa-i chemam si sa-i avertizam. Sa aleaga: ori Romania, ori Rusia! Si asa s-a intamplat si cu Tismenitki. Acum, toti ilegalistii au ramas pro-sovietici. Si aschia nu sare departe de trunchi… Altul, la fel: tatal lui Celac, primul ministru de Externe pus de Iliescu chiar in ’89. Agent sovietic. Numele lui e de fapt Cealik, e pe jumatate gagauz. Are si o sora, Mariana, pe care o intindeau colegii mei de la “Scanteia Tineretului” pe sus, deasupra Cofetariei “Albina”, unde aveam sediu atunci… El era ofiter in Armata Romana. Nevasta-sa era cel putin pe jumatate evreica. Erau in agentura. Si-atunci, guvernul lui Armand Calinescu l-a trimis din Basarabia la Perisor, langa Craiova. Cand au venit trupele sovietice si apoi comunistii, la 6 martie 1945, l-au pus primul prefect de Dolj, al Craiovei. Deci au reusit totusi sa ramana in structuri pana in 1989 si dupa… Ce se intampla… Erau si cazuri mai complicate. De exemplu Gogu Radulescu, membru al CPEx al CC al PCR. Taica-sau, tigan lautar. El s-a casatorit cu o evreica. Ca asa era “moda” atunci. Suntem in perioada ilegalista. PCR era format asa: din minoritari evrei, unguri care vroiau regiunea autonoma maghiara, rusi care militau pentru desprinderea Basarabiei si printre ei cativa romani. Dupa ce au intrat in legalitate, s-a intors roata: romanii au devenit majoritari. Dar atunci sotiile lor erau: evreice, unguroaice, rusoaice… Asa: sotia lui Gogu era vanzatoare la magazinul “Sora”. Pe asta a apucat-o iunie ’40 – ultimatumul care a dus la cedarea teritoriilor romanesti de la Est – in Basarabia. N-a mai venit in tara. In prima zi de razboi antisovietic, cand Antonescu a dat celebrul ordin, Gogu, care era intr-un regiment pe granita, a trecut la rusi. A dezertat. Aia s-au si mirat: au zis ca e spion. Nu, el vroia in URSS! Dupa care s-a regasit cu nevasta-sa si, dupa razboi, a venit pe cai mari, pe tancuri adica, in tara. El era mai legat de URSS decat de Romania. Pe-asta era greu sa-l clintesti. De-altfel s-a si vazut, a stat pana in ultima clipa langa Ceausescu, sa se asigure ca pica. Cand a venit Iliescu si ne-au arestat, pe noi, membrii CPEx, el si cu Barbu Petrescu, cel care a organizat mitingul din 21 decembrie 1989, n-au mai fost inchisi. Reteaua lui Gogu Radulescu Gogu isi crease o adevarata retea de intelectuali acolo la Comana, unde statea el. Valeria Seciu era amanta lui, Blandiana la fel; isi facuse si casa acolo, chiar langa el, ca sa-i fie mai aproape. Pai Otilia Coman, ca asta-i numele ei, facuse inconjurul lumii de pe vremea lui Ceausescu. Cred ca a vazut mai multe tari decat mine, ca ministru de Externe. Asta micu’, galagiosu’ de la TV, Dinescu, mergea cu soferul si Dacia neagra a lui Gogu. Astia si cu Iliescu l-au scos si cred ca acum ii putrezesc oasele pe undeva, prin Israel. Altii care au fost scapati pe langa Gogu si Petrescu: Ion Ursu si Constantin Dascalescu. Fost absolvent al Scolii Superioare de Partid de la Moscova, Dascalescu, in anii cand era secretar si apoi prim-secretar regional de partid la Galati, se intalnea deseori in zona cu ofiteri KGB ori GRU. Chiar inainte de momentul decembrie ’89 se intretinuse cu consulul sovietic de la Ismail. Pe-astia i-a “iertat” de puscarie Iliescu… Noua ne-a facut recurs de era sa facem 15 ani de inchisoare. Pentru ce? Cica “genocid” – ca am omorat 60.000 de oameni… Continuarea la ZIUA: Iliescu in pat cu Elena
V-ati intrebat vreodata ce au facut SRI si SIE impreuna cu factorul politic in ultimii 18 ani privind spionii anti-Romania, unii dintre ei activi chiar la varful Guvernului si a Administratiei Prezidentiale? Raspunsul vi-l da jurnalistul Mihai Munteanu in EvZ de astazi: au frecat-o! De cele mai multe ori impreuna cu spionii si agentii de influenta ai unor puteri straini. Ce le-a mai ramas bietilor ofiteri de informatii care si-au nenorocit zilele si noptile pe urmele lor? Sa apeleze la presa. Asta cand se poate. Ca de multe ori si, in special, in ultima perioada, nici asta nu se mai poate…
Reţeaua „IUDA“: spionii lui Ivan de Mihai Munteanu Luni, 23 Iunie 2008 Culisele tranzacţiilor cu armament dezvăluie anvergura operaţiunilor ruseşti din România. Un raport al Direcţiei de Siguranţă Militară de la Bucureşti (DSM – contraspionajul militar) pune în lumină modul în care serviciile secrete de la Moscova penetrează informativ industria naţională de apărare. Miza: controlul operaţiunilor de import-export, cu potenţial financiar uriaş, şi informaţii „preţioase“ privind strategia de apărare a guvernului român. Filajul DSM identifică un personaj-cheie: Aurel Cazacu (foto). Nume de cod: „Iuda“. Nume real: Aurel Cazacu. Funcţia: şeful Direcţiei Generale Industria de Apărare din Ministerul Economiei, prin care se coordonează Romarm, producătorul naţional de armament. Aurel Cazacu a fost luat în obiectivul Direcţiei de Siguranţă Militară (DSM) – serviciul de contraspionaj al Direcţiei Generale de Informaţii a Armatei. EVZ a obţinut câteva dintre rapoartele DSM. Analiştii identifică, pas cu pas, interesele ruseşti din jurul Romtehnica – traderul de armament al Ministerului Apărării. Avertismentul DSM nu se referă doar la riscul contrabandei cu arme româneşti, ci şi la spionajul economic al Kremlinului. Sub guvernarea PSD, Cazacu a fost directorul Romtehnica. Acum, e monitorizat din cauza „deserviciilor“ aduse prin legăturile sale cu ofiţeri de informaţii ruşi, israelieni şi americani. Aceştia penetrează informativ zona producţiei şi comerţului românesc cu armament, sub paravanul reprezentării unor corporaţii străine din domeniu. Aurel Cazacu are o filosofie proprie: „Cât am fost la Romtehnica, m-am luptat ca aceasta să fie prima. Acum, la Romarm, mă lupt pentru Romarm“. Vorbeşte mult, dar ocoleşte subiectul principal cu dexteritate şi crede că în spatele ziariştilor se ascund „alte interese“. Recunoaşte, însă, tot ce scrie în rapoartele DSM, dar pretinde o copie. Cum nu i se oferă, condiţionează: „S-ar putea să-mi aduc aminte mai multe, dacă am şi eu o copie“. În rest, vine cu justificări: „Ei vor să vândă, nu să producă, iar eu am tot interesul să-i ţin aici ca să producă. Trebuie ajutaţi, investiţiile trebuie sprijinite“. „Reţeaua IUDA: Spionii lui Ivan“ este prima radiografie a spionilor din culisele afacerii cu tehnică specială. UMBRELA ARMITECH Filieră rusească via Panama Reţeaua „IUDA“: spionii lui Ivan [2008-06-23]Culisele tranzacţiilor cu armament dezvăluie anvergura operaţiunilor ruseşti din România. … [citeste]
In conferinta extraordinara de presa de azi, reprezentantii organizatorilor Fenomenului Piata Universitatii 1989-1990 si ai victimelor mineriadelor au facut apel la presedintele Traian Basescu pentru revocarea din functie a generalului penal Dan Voinea si trecerea pe rol a Dosarelor Revolutiei si Mineriadelor pentru pedepsirea vinovatilor, fie si dupa 18 ani.
Dan Voinea, 18 ani de minciuna
Dan Voinea, musamalizatorul
Dan Voinea, generalul-infractor
Dan Voinea, membru al conspiratiei din decembrie 1989
AFLAT IN COMPLETUL DE “JUDECATA” AL SOTILOR CEA– USESCU
“Jurnalul National” titreaza, vineri, 8 februarie: “Băsescu, omul Statelor Unite” intr-un articol scris de Gabi Golea (https://www.jurnalul.ro/articole/116424/basescu-omul-statelor-unite) ANALIZÅ ● Istoria unei campanii electorale “Un expert francez în serviciile de informaţii americane susţine, într-un interviu publicat vineri, 1 februarie, de ziarul Izvestia, că Traian Băsescu a fost candidatul sprijinit de SUA în alegerile prezidenţiale din 2004”. Misto! Expertul e Catherine Durandin. Am gasit articolul original prin amabilitatea colegei mele – a mai mica – si cu putin ajutor l-am trecut printr-un program de traducere automata. Il prezint asa, in forma nefinisata, pentru cine e interesat. Atentie pe preotii ortodocsi si pe studenti!
The expert{auditeur} on American special services Katrin Dyuranden:
“Gorbachev was afraid to speak seriously with Bush about Germany “
by Oleg Shevtsov What is CIA – the tool of imperial politics or the effective mechanism in struggle for freedom of democracy? Êàòðèí Äþðàíäåí, the professor of the Parisian Institute of the international and strategic researches and the author of the sensational books ” Bush’s Dynasty “, ” CIA on war ” and ” CIA – five years in anger “, slightly opens secrets of the American special services, shares data known to it{her} on a hidden circumstance of “velvet” revolutions. With it{her} the Parisian correspondent of “News” Oleg Shevtsov talked. Question: Why CIA has appeared in deep crisis, having missed on September, 11th? The answer: All fault have assigned to investigation and Georges Teneta as its{her} director. However Georges Bush’s administration has not lead then personnel cleanings. In fact the top of CIA has agreed to divide{undresse} with the White house the responsibility for preparation and the beginning of operation in Iraq. The basic arguments in favour of intervention – the information on presence at Saddam Hussein of the weapon of mass destruction and data on presence “Àëü-Êàèäû” in Iraq – with a serious stretch have been included by CIA in the report to the congress. But it was soon found out: the given data – “linden”. It became one more impact on reputation of CIA: many brilliant employees, first of all representatives of intellectual elite, have submitted to resignation. Q: But in fact CIA not for the first time tries to affect{influence} the decision of the country leaders, manipulating conclusions? A: That’s just the point, that CIA after September, 11th was completely under the control of administration. And under its{her} order has forged data, it is artificial forcing conditions around of Iraq and giving “terrible” arguments for the beginning military actions. As a result the report cost resignations to state secretary Colin Powell who at George Tenet’s stood at it{him} behind a back presence, has publicly declared{announced} presence in Iraq of the weapon of mass destruction. At Bush-younger the role of CIA has been shown to the decision of momentary problems{tasks}, and it any more does not conduct independent tracking of world{global} conditions. Q: In the work you use original documents of CIA from which the security classification is removed{taken off}… A: The matter is that earlier I studied{investigated} CIA in the historical plan. I could work in American ñïåöàðõèâàõ. Here I got acquainted with the file about operations of CIA of the last years. I have a solid set of documents which testify to application by employees of the American investigation in 1950th years of narcotic ËÑÄ and tortures at interrogations. And at last, me documents on preparation öýðýóøíèêàìè Gorbachev and Bush-senior meetings at the summit on Malta in 1989 have got. Q: Also what there was? A: Gorbachev met Bush by the military ship, and at this time there was a terrible storm. Now I have a full confidence, that your president was absolutely not ready to this summit. Cardinally important event for Soviet Union was discussed: association of Germany. Gorbachev should achieve, that it{she} became neutral. But it{he} has underestimated the partner on negotiations: Bush-senior and the chancellor of Germany Helmut Kohl have already agreed – the incorporated Germany will be included into NATO. This historical meeting prepared Ãîñäåïîì the USA and, naturally, investigation. The basic emphasis – on a theme of human rights. Infinite lists of persons{faces} which wished to leave the USSR there appeared, sat in camps. There was even a list of the Soviet brides, unsuccessfully tried to marry foreigners. And Bush spoke, insisted, pressed, not stopping. Yes so, that polite Gorbachev during any moment has not sustained: ” But you do not have monopoly for human rights! ” But it has not confused Bush, and it{he} continued to show these lists, not giving{allowing} the Soviet president and a mouth to open. The purpose – ” to not allow to start talking about a neutrality of Germans ” – it has been reached{achieved}. Q: Eventually Gorbachev has surrendered? A: it seems to Me, it{he} has begun to panic. On it, actually, also there was a calculation of CIA. In Moscow at that time, in the end of 1989, there was uneasy conditions for Gorbachev. And up to the final decision of a German question remains three weeks. And calculation ðàçâåäóïðàâëåíèÿ, secretary general who has well studied{investigated} character, was under construction that it{he} has been exhausted psychologically and it{he} simply will not have hardness to resist to pressure of the West. Most of all Gorbachev’s to act Francois Mitterand was surprised: it{he} has called back to Bush and has told, that the Soviet leader could not on such agree in any way. Q: But it is primary in Gorbachev’s intentions did not enter “to hand over” Germany? A: I have certificates: even leaders of the Western Europe did not expect, that events will develop so quickly. In my opinion, it is the tragical moment in history of the USSR. Q: you think, what it was possible to force to sign Bush any obligations from NATO? A: Probably. It is clear, why Russian consider{count}, that them then have deceived. In fact there was an oral arrangement to not place the weapon in territory of former GDR, however about it{her} at once have forgotten. Sharp expansion of NATO has provoked the subsequent collapse{landslide} to the east, ended crash of the Union. If all went more systematically instead of how have arranged the USA, painful{unhealthy} cataclysms in the East Europe would manage to be avoided. Q: In your books about CIA it is spoken about recruitment by Americans of priests in âîñòî÷íîåâðîïåéñêèõ the countries… A: I have learned{have found out} This information in 1992 from the interlocutor from the American embassy in Bucharest. It{he} has boasted, that during “democratization” of Romania the American special services operated{worked} through ïîëêîâûõ priests. Investigation had special programs for orthodox fathers in armies. Them instructed how correctly to adjust{set up} flock, to prevent ” blind obedience ” the soldier to unconstitutional orders. I have been amazed{struck}, how Americans have dexterously guessed to get into the closed environment of Armed forces ×àóøåñêó which then were formed on the basis of a compulsory military service. I do not have data about number of the enlisted{recruited} priests. But the idea has seemed to me extremely original. Q: When you have started to work with documents of CIA? A: It is connected with research work across Romania. Studying{investigating} a decline of dictator Chaushesku, I have collided{faced} with very strange facts. For example, Minister of Defence Mircha Pashku was trained in the USA in 1988. And the ambassador of Romania at the United Nations I met earlier in other quality – as the owner of the grant of one American centre of science. Me other members of the “democratic” Romanian government generated after overthrow of a mode have interested also all. It was found out, that the American proteges in it{him} – the majority. Q: That is the new political elite of Romania almost has not with its full complement passed{has not with its full complement taken place} special training in the USA? A: Well, maybe, not preparation, but with all from them contact in advance has been come into. And they received instructions is precisely. The policy{politics} of “openness” enabled the USA to form a ruling clique at own discretion. If to take Romania, Bulgaria, even Hungary and to look, that today’s ministers and leading politicians{policies; politics} till 1990th years you receive a curious picture did{made}. Someone has necessarily visited long business trip in the USA, someone has passed{has taken place} the American rates of management under special programs. It was competent work of investigation on selection of the necessary people in the East Europe. Not clearly, why the same is impossible to Americans in Afghanistan and Iraq. Q: Whom, in your opinion, CIA feels itself – as the tool of imperial politics or the fighter for freedom? A: For empire “solidity” in realization of the strategic purposes is characteristic. And in the USA it{this} is not present. There different lobbies, opposition, democrats… The Majority of people in CIA with which I communicated, is well ìîòèâèðîâàííûå professionals, for which national interests of the USA above all. Many really trust, that they release{exempt} people from tyranny and dictatorships. Those who feels itself “Ðýìáî”, playing secret wars and plots, least. But business also that problems{tasks} before investigation put financial circles and a military-industrial complex. Q: And secret currents inside of CIA are? A: Now inside of investigation there are the parallel structures which are carrying out the certain order. The most disturbing: in operations and special operations “experts{auditeurs}” from practically not private{individual} structures under control to executive authority are used. At deficiency of trust to the government, at absence of the clear purposes war it becomes frequent “dirty”. Bigwigs of the organized crime interfere With it{her}, íàðêîäåëüöû, dealers the weapon – as we see it both in Afghanistan, and in Kosovo. Q: What do you think of “color” revolutions in territory of the formerUSSR? It too firm ïîñòóïü democracies or the technique tested in the East Europe? A: As has shown the analysis of events of December, 2004 in Romania, export of revolution can be successful only when there is an internal demand. Change of president Iliesku with the American candidate -Traian Basescu, has passed{has taken place} on hurrah. Those parties{sets}, groups, student’s movements which advanced it{him}, really leaned{based} on the USA. Áýñåñêó till now it is popular in Romania. Yes, really, all Americans have organized. Financing because of ocean went mainly on the organization of student’s demonstrations. I not so well know a situation in Ukraine and in Georgia, but imposing “help” from the outside is usual gives{allows} result if there are objective preconditions. And if they are not present….
the script varies – and the result can be unexpected.
WASHINGTON, Feb 5 (Reuters) – The United States is worried that Russia, China and OPEC oil-producing countries could use their growing financial clout to advance political goals, the top U.S. spy chief told Congress on Tuesday.
Such economic matters joined terrorism, nuclear proliferation and computer-network vulnerabilities as top U.S. security threats described by National Director of Intelligence Michael McConnell (center) in an annual assessment.
McConnell said U.S. intelligence agencies had “concerns about the financial capabilities of Russia, China and OPEC countries and the potential use of their market access to exert financial leverage to political ends.”Russia, bolstered in part by oil revenues, was positioning itself to control an energy supply and transportation network from Europe to East Asia, and the Russian military had begun to reverse a long decline, he told the Senate Intelligence Committee.China has pursued a policy of global engagement out of a desire to expand its growing economy and obtain access markets, resources, technology and expertise, McConnell said.It seeks a constructive relationship with the United States and other countries, but as its influence grows “Beijing probably will increasingly expect its interests to be respected by other countries,” he said.
Russia and China have long been able to target U.S. computer systems to collect intelligence, he said. “The worrisome part is, today, they also could target information infrastructure systems for degradation or destruction.”In the energy sector, a weak U.S. dollar had prompted some oil suppliers, including Iran, Syria and Libya, to ask for payment in other currencies, or to delink their currencies from the dollar, McConnell said. “Continued concerns about dollar depreciation could tempt other producers to follow suit.”
Gasiti aici Raportul plin de date importante pentru Romania:
Ceea ce scrie ZIUA si subsemnatul 🙂 de cativa ani buni, inclusiv in ce priveste scurgerile de info de la NATO la Moscova, adevereste azi presa occidentala de varf, respectiv IHT. Dar ceea ce nu au luat in calcul inca este ca Ucraina urmeaza sa fie viitorul magar troian al KGB/GRU in NATO.
Chiar astazi, cand se semneaza la Viena un nou contract pentru Nabucco, iata cu Ungaria a anuntat ca este interesata (normal) in South Stream – “conducta aurie” a lui Putin.
Mai jos, nota ZIUA si articolul original din IHT.
Credibilitatea Bulgariei si Ungariei in NATO a inceput sa fie pusa la indoiala, informeaza presa occidentala. Dupa semnarea unui tratat cu Rusia care saboteaza proiectul UE al gazoductului Nabucco, Bulgaria a fost acuzata ca transmite rusilor secrete NATO. “Pot pune pariu ca orice am impartasit cu bulgarii in cadrul NATO s-a dus direct la Moscova”, a declarat pentru New York Times un oficial NATO care a preferat sa-si pastreze anonimatul. Pe de alta parte, noul sef al serviciilor secrete ungare, care a fost instruit timp de sase ani la Academia KGB din Moscova, a devenit director al Comisiei de Informatii a NATO, initiativa perceputa de diplomati ca o posibila compromitere a securitatii aliantei, scrie International Herald Tribune, preluat de Mediafax.
New NATO intelligence chief was trained by KGB By Judy Dempsey – International Herald Tribune Published: February 3, 2008
BERLIN: The new chief of the Hungarian secret services, who spent six years at the KGB’s academy in Moscow during the 1980s, has become chairman of NATO’s intelligence committee, a development that diplomats said could compromise the security of the alliance. Sandor Laborc, 49, was personally chosen by Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany of Hungary as director of the country’s counterintelligence National Security Office in December, after a bitter dispute between the governing coalition led by the Socialists – the former Communists – and the main opposition party, Fidesz. Laborc, a former Communist who was trained at the KGB’s Dzerzhinsky Academy from 1983 to 1989, according to members of the national security committee in the Hungarian Parliament, had failed to win support from that committee, which oversees such appointments. Despite that, Gyurcsany and Gyorgy Szilvasy, the minister responsible for the intelligence services, pushed through the appointment. “A decision by the National Security Committee has no binding effect,” Gyurcsany’s office said in a statement issued in response to several written questions about Laborc from the International Herald Tribune. “Gyorgy Szilvasy had the right to make a decision in his own capacity and advise the prime minister. He justified the recommendation by introducing General Laborc as someone with unquestioned professional credentials.” Soon after his appointment, Laborc took over the chairmanship of NATO’s special committee dealing with a wide range of intelligence issues, a rotating post that is held for a year and which fell to Hungary last month, alliance officials confirmed Friday. The committee, whose main task is to analyze and share intelligence, includes all of the secret service chiefs of NATO countries, who meet several times a year. Several NATO delegations, including the United States, whose ambassador was asked several times to comment on Laborc’s appointment, declined to do so. James Appathurai, a NATO spokesman, said, “We do not comment on personnel appointments or intelligence issues.” Some delegations said they had not been aware of Laborc’s biography. His short curriculum vitae posted on the Hungarian security service’s official Web site makes no mention of his time spent in Moscow. His past came to light when Szilvasy proposed him for the top intelligence job last autumn. NATO diplomats who did agree to discuss the appointment insisted on anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter. They said that even if they had reservations about Laborc, they were in no position to block his appointment. “NATO makes decisions on the basis of consensus,” said a senior diplomat from an East European country. “If we had questioned this appointment then we would have to go further up to the top, in this case the Hungarian prime minister, to ask him about Laborc’s past.” Another diplomat, from a Western country, said, “It would have taken one phone call by the U.S. ambassador to NATO to stop this appointment. It would have been a signal to other countries which might think they can still get away with this.” In its statement, Gyurcsany’s office said: “Not a single ambassador protested. Through diplomatic channels we received information that our partners are satisfied with the development of interagency cooperation.” In practice, Laborc’s appointment means that some NATO countries will be much more wary about sharing sensitive intelligence. “Here we have a person who was trained by the KGB. I cannot assume that he has changed that much in his attitudes,” said another NATO diplomat, predicting that several important NATO countries would hold back on sharing intelligence. “NATO, it must be said, is a very leaky organization,” the diplomat added. Indeed, NATO has been plagued with leaks. Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic joined the alliance in 1999, and the rest of the former Warsaw Pact countries in 2004. After that expansion, military attachés from the Bulgarian delegation did not receive clearance to have access to a certain level of intelligence material. “You could bet that anything we shared with Bulgaria inside NATO went straight to Moscow ,” said another senior Western European diplomat. “The old Communist nomenklatura and secret services is still around in Romania and Bulgaria. But I must say the case of Hungary is very, very disappointing.” Earlier, in the spring of 1999 when NATO was selecting bombing targets in its war to stop Serbian repression of ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, Greece, a member of NATO and the European Union but an ally of Serbia during the Balkan wars of the 1990s, repeatedly leaked alliance plans to Belgrade, NATO diplomats said Friday. In Hungary itself , Laborc’s appointment has deepened the mistrust and polarization between the governing Socialists and the Fidesz opposition because of the way the prime minister by-passed the Parliament’s national security committee.
Although the committee’s decision is not constitutionally binding, such committees have served as important instruments of democratic accountability since 1990, when the Communists were removed from power in Hungary. Moreover, until 2002 when the Socialists won the parliamentary elections, any Hungarian official who had served for more than a year in Moscow could not, for security reasons, be appointed to positions higher than a department head. “At stake is the fundamental regard for the rule of law,” said Janos Martonyi, a former Hungarian foreign minister and Fidesz supporter. After a five-hour debate by the national security committee in late November, Laborc failed to win a majority of the 11 votes. No other candidate was offered by the government. The opposition declined to put forward a candidate. Fidesz claims that Gyurcsany, a former Communist youth leader turned millionaire who has close ties to President Vladimir Putin of Russia, has been politicizing the secret services for domestic reasons in order to keep track of the opposition, the media and trade unions. The opposition also has criticzed Gyurcsany for trying to push through austerity measures without public consultation or democratic accountability. It has challenged the security services’ use of live ammunition against mostly peaceful demonstrators during protests in September 2006. The protests had been set off by a leak of Gyurcsany’s speech to party supporters, soon after the spring 2006 elections, in which he said the party had lied “day and night” about the miserable state of the economy in order to win. Zsolt Nemeth, chairman of the Parliament’s foreign affairs committee and a leading member of Fidesz, said it was “a great shame what is happening to the idea of democratic accountability.” He said the two biggest concerns over the Laborc appointment were that he would replace the young professionals who entered the services during the 1990s and bring back people loyal to Gyurcsany. “Above all, our concern is that the security services will be become politicized and be used for domestic politics,” he added. Peter Balazs, an economics professor at Central European University in Budapest and a supporter of the government, dismissed Fidesz’s criticisms. “Much has changed in Hungary since Laborc’s time spent in Moscow over 20 years ago,” he said. “This is all about internal politics. Just because someone was in Moscow during the 1980s, I don’t think that we should sack anybody after 20 years.” Besides the opposition, the United States and Britain are concerned about Gyurcsany’s relations with Putin, according to British diplomats in London. Last year, Gyurcsany publicly supported Russia’s plans to build the South Stream pipeline that will compete with the EU project known as Nabucco, which is intended to weaken Europe’s dependence on Russian gas imports. British diplomats, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that Gyurcsany had changed tack under American and British pressure. Then last December, during a meeting of the Hungarian and Russian cabinets in Budapest, Gyurcsany came out again in support of the South Stream project.
October 24th, 2008 
VR 
Activitate intensa a Civic Media zilele acestea:
Posted in Uncategorized 
Tags: 
