Posts Tagged ‘Lazurca’

DECEMBRIE 1989. Film INEDIT pe 8 mm de la Timisoara din 19 decembrie 1989. Documentar: Atacul Ungariei asupra Romaniei vazut de serviciile secrete romanesti. Pacatele lui Baconschi cu Securitatea: Sa nu minti!

Camil Tulcan, creatorul RasterPoint, a publicat dupa 24 de ani un film realizat de tatal sau, Doru Tulcan, la Timisoara, in ziua de 19 decembrie 1989, pe o pelicula de 8 mm. Il prezentam aici, cu multumiri:

Ziaristi Online:

Decembrie 1989: Atacul Ungariei asupra Romaniei vazut de serviciile secrete romanesti (I). “Neorevizionismul ungar a devenit vârful de lance al “reformarii” sistemului politic din România”


În mentalul colectiv maghiar, evenimentele din decembrie 1989, în mod special circumstanţele cu semnificaţie neechivocă de la Timişoara, au fost percepute şi ca o mişcare naţională proprie, dovada fiind, pe de o parte, explozia exceselor xenofobe împotriva românilor, iar, pe de altă parte, escaladarea separatismului etnic, în formele şi modalităţile care au amorsat conflictul interetnic din 19-20 martie la Târgu Mureş.

Decembrie 1989: Baconschi ii multumea de Craciun colonelului de Securitate care il fila pe Patriarhul Teoctist de Inviere

Teodor Baconschi dedicatie Securitate

Fostului consilier pe problemele de culte si cultura ale Presedintelui Traian Basescu, fost Ministru de Externe al Romaniei in Guvernul Boc, fost ambasador al României la Paris si Vatican si fost inspector MAE in jacuzzi-ul ambasadoarei Vulpe din Australia, teologului de serviciu Teodor Baconschi – nasul ambasadorului Lizarduca de la Chisinau – , in visele lui umede “catindat” in cuplu prezidential cu MRU, pe 18 decembrie 1989, cand la Timisoara se murea, ii ardea de felicitat coloneii de Securitate ai RSR.

Baconschi Baconsky dedicatie Vasile Burulean col Securitate 18 Decembrie 1989

Scrisoare Deschisa catre Smithsonian Institute in cazul Scandalului antiromanesc “Mostenirea maghiara: Radacinile renasterii”/“Hungarian Heritage: Roots to Revival”. Folclorul si traditiile romanesti nu sunt nici unguresti nici tiganesti. In atentia mass-media, a MAE, SIE si SRI

x Bozgori homosexuali la Smithsonian Folklife Festival 2013 via Ziaristi Online18 July 2013

To:       The Smithsonian Institute Board of Regents

The Directors and Managers of the Smithsonian Folklife Festival

The Ethnographers, Historians and Managers of the “Hungarian Heritage: Roots to Revival” event


Fm:      Media Professionals of the Worldwide Romanian Diaspora


Re:       Request for Information, Clarification and Corrective Actions Regarding Representations and Incidents at the 2013 “Hungarian Heritage: Roots to Revival” Event, National Mall


  • ·                    Purpose.  The purpose of this correspondence is to request information, clarification and corrective actions regarding representations and incidents at the 2013 “Hungarian Heritage: Roots to Revival” event staged at the National Mall in Washington, D.C. on behalf of numerous media professionals and media organizations of the worldwide Romanian Diaspora.


EXCLUSIV Dan Tanasa Ro, in atentia SRI, SIE si MAE: Budapesta cheltuiește un milion de dolari ca să promoveze “Ungaria Mare” in SUA. Scandalul antiromanesc de la Smithsonian Folklife Festival. GALERIE FOTO

Dublu scandal antiromanesc in SUA. Reactia MAE inexistenta. Ungurii fura “Ciocarlia” romaneasca si agreseaza ziaristi romani la Smithsonian FolkLife Festival. ICR pune paie pe foc: Tigani autointitulati ansamblul “Ciocarlia” reprezinta Romania

Associated Press prezinta Transilvania drept o regiune a Ungariei in stirea despre Festivalul unguresc de la Washington. Ambasada Romaniei nu are nici o reactie.

Associated Press against Romania -  Transilvania - Hungarian Roots - Smithsonian Institute


  • ·                     Event Background. Between 26-30 June and 3-7 July, the Smithsonian Institute organized “Smithsonian Folklife Festival” on the grounds of the U.S. National Mall. This year, the guest of honor was the country of Hungary which was invited to participate in the program by Smithsonian Institute organizers. Under the name of “Hungarian Heritage: Roots to Revival”, the Hungarian program was produced by the Smithsonian Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage in partnership with the Balassi Institute, Budapest. Major support was provided by the Hungary Initiative Foundation and National Cultural Endowment of Hungary. Additional support was provided by the Hungarian American Coalition, American Hungarian Federation, Hungarian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Embassy of Hungary in Washington, D.C., and others.  The stated overarching goal of the Folklife Festival programsin general is to present and bring close to attendees the folk cultural heritage of invited countries to the American public. The showcase of traditions of culture was masterfully done. However, several incidents happened on the background of a tense political situation in Hungary and Romania today that require specific answers from the American organizers, namely the Smithsonian Institute/Smithsonian Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage.  The geo-political issue in which the Smithsonian Institute has apparently inserted itself is important enough that it demands answers from the Board of Regents, as well as directors and managers of the “Hungarian Heritage: Roots to Revival” event.


  • “Hungarian Heritage:  Roots to Revival” Overview.  As a guest of honor, Hungary was handed the opportunity to showcase its rich culture and traditions to a large American and international audience on the Washington, D.C. National Mall. The preparation for this program took approximately two years, according to the Hungarian organizers,with over one million dollars of expenses paid by the Government of Hungary, according to the Hungarian Ambassador in Washington, D.C., as well as other substantial donors.  This data was publicized at the following URL:

Approximately 120 participants were brought to Washington, D.C. from Hungary, Romania, Serbia, and around the U.S.A. Among them, approximately 30 participants were dancers and singers, most of them from Romania, a preponderance from the Romanian region known most famously as Transylvania.The master chef in one of the food kitchen tents at the festival, for example, is a well-known Magyar (ethnic Hungarian) restaurant owner in Chicago who was born and raised in Romania, still celebrates his Romanian roots and spoke with journalists in his native Romanian language as well as English for media interviews.  It therefore came as an unwelcome surprisethat Transylvania was constantly cited only in a Hungarian ethnic context during the stage performances and afterwards during recorded video interviews with performers and organizers.  Numerous discrepancies arose which caught the attention of attending members of the credentialed media, which need to be addressed by the Smithsonian Institute responsible personnel and experts.  These items are detailed herein.


  • Map Graphics, Regional and Village Naming Conventions by Smithsonian Institute.  Prominently displayed around the “Hungarian Heritage:  Roots to Revival” tents and exhibits were large maps, detailing the areas from which the songs, music, arts and crafts were drawn; the vast majority of which are in Transylvania within the sovereign territory of Romania.  Names of villages and regions, on Romanian territory, are presented with only the Hungarian names and leaving attendees and audience members with the clear misunderstanding that Transylvania is a part of modern Hungary.  In fact, research indicates that the maps, as illustrated and presented by the Smithsonian Institute at this Festival, are strikingly similar to Hungarian “separatist” maps publicized by those seeking to break Transylvania away from the country of Romania.  These are maps used by Hungarian ultra-nationalists and separatists in their ambition to “liberate” a large portion of Romania to “autonomy” for the Magyar minority.  Against this background, those of us in the media and international Romanian Diaspora wish an explanation:  How were these maps selected by the Smithsonian Institute? Which experts at the Smithsonian vetted these map graphics? Did the Smithsonian organizers, sponsors, managers or historians seek to blur the distinction between Transylvania as part of the sovereign territory of Romania, versus suggesting that it is somehow part of modern-day Hungary, or was this misrepresentation a simple error and oversight by the Smithsonian Institute for which it takes responsibility? Did anyone take into account regional sensitivities when drawing up this map for public display?


  • Traditions, Songs and Cultural Traditions Presented at the Festival.  Media observers noticed and recorded traditional Romanian songs, dance and dress being presented several times on such venues as the Danubia Stage, but with the announcers making only passing reference to the “Transylvanian” and “Hungarian” roots but without acknowledging the actual historic Romanian roots.  The fact that various Romanian traditions were presented as Hungarian was even acknowledged on-camera in media interviews with performers, event managers and organizers (in at least one case the interviewee stated that the organizers “were not proud, but not ashamed” of the Romanian roots of the songs, dance and dress that were being presented as Hungarian traditions).  During the Hungarian Ambassador’s radio address about the Festival, he makes no mention of Romania or even Transylvania in his eight-minute interview, or even acknowledges the multi-cultural traditions presented on the stages by a talented cast (as noted, comprised of many Romanian citizens).  Repeatedly, all references are solely toward Hungary.  Against this information, could the Smithsonian Institute and experts please offer explanations?  Was the Board of Regents or any other responsible executive body of the Smithsonian Institute aware that Romanian songs, dance and dress were presented on-stage but without acknowledging the Romanian roots?  Who was the responsible historian or ethnographer from the Smithsonian Institute who vetted the songs, dances and dress that appeared on stage, and was it a conscious decision to mention the “Transylvanian” history in reference to Hungary, but without adequately citing Romanian culture and traditions?  How does the Smithsonian wish to respond to the query as to why “Hungarian” roots for revival was presented by so many Romanian citizens and drew heavily on Romanian traditions, but was presented almost exclusively as “Transylvanian” or “Hungarian” culture?


  • Incidents of Intolerance, Separatist and Ultra-Nationalist Actions by Hungarian/Magyar Participants.  Shortly after the construction of the large festival dance pavilion was completed, some of the Hungarian/Magyar participants in the festival raised a flag over the structure.  The flag was the Hungarian-colored flag of the Magyar Separatist Movement in Transylvania, also displayed on the festival map as “Székelyföld”.  It was taken down by Festival organizers, but perhaps was prologue to later incidents of intolerance.  After a wonderful, high-energy performance at the Danubia Stage, three Magyar/Hungarian performers cursed at an elderly woman who had a wrist-ribbon of Romanian colors (this is on video).  The same performers accosted a U.S. citizen and journalist, also wearing a wrist ribbon of Romanian colors (similar, incidentally, to those on the trim of many of the dancers’ costumes), cursed the cameraman and one Magyar/Hungarian member physically grabbed the hand and arm of a media professional while another said in Hungarian language, “while wave that Romanian flag, Transylvania belongs to Hungary.”  This entire incident is also on video.  The Romanian flag was being held by a Romanian national while a Romanian journalist, incidentally, was simply conducting an interview on the gravel path adjacent to the Festival “tavern” tent with another U.S. citizen of Romanian descent who was raving about what a marvelous performance it was.  These audience members and credentialed media personnel were happy and excited about the excellent stage productions, “high-fiving” many performers and speaking at length in Romanian language with numerous Romanian cast members who were delighted to be recognized and appreciated by fellow Romanian countrymen.  It was on this scene of pleasant celebration of an excellent stage production that the three Magyar/Hungarian performers inserted their separatist and ultra-nationalist agendas, alleging that the presence of Romanians and their flag on the National Mall was “a provocation” and insisting that the Romanians—and the media members and associated U.S. citizens of Romanian descent—leave the area.  Videos and images have been made available, and reportedly other citizens have already written the Smithsonian requesting answers.  The undersigned media members and Romanian Diaspora would like the Smithsonian to kindly address whether the Smithsonian Institute organizers vetted the performers?  Were the performers who were pursuing Magyar Separatist agendas known to the Smithsonian?  As many cast members were Romanian citizens and presenting Romanian dances, dress and traditions, a few singing Romanian songs in Romanian language, can the Smithsonian executive team please explain the rationale behind the “Hungarian Heritage:  Roots to Revival” event featuring these as “Hungarian” but without acknowledgement that Transylvania is Romania?  Do the historians, experts and event organizers at the Smithsonian believe that Transylvania is part of Hungary?


  • Conclusions.  Although we are not seeking, as members of the media and worldwide Romanian Diaspora, a judgment on the actions or conduct of a number of Hungarian/Magyar participants or the incidents themselves, we collectively are calling upon the Smithsonian Board of Regents—which includes several high ranking officials of the United States Government and therefore has significant clout on geo-political issues such as the Magyar Separatist movement—and the Smithsonian executive management to issue a joint and public statement on the issues we raised in this letter.  At this point, an observer would conclude that the Smithsonian Institute and the senior U.S. government officials on the Board of Regents either tacitly or explicitly endorse the ethnic-Hungarian—Magyar Separatist movement in Transylvania.  Apparent efforts by the Festival event organizers—from map graphics to stage presentations, to chasing away Romanian audience members and media, to the attempt by Hungarian artists to fly the Hungarian Separatist Flag from the top of the constructed festival dance pavilion and statements to the media made by these performers expressing strong desire of autonomy for Transylvania—indicate the need for precise explanations and an official position published by the most senior executive members of the Smithsonian.  The stage performances, music, dress and dance were spectacular and thrilling to observe.  That many of these were adopted by Hungarian groups and shared and enriched by and between Gypsy/Roma, Romanian, Jewish and Hungarian ethnicities is testimony to the treasure that is multi-cultural heritage.  That such beauty on stage, could be marred by apparent displays of separatist agendas, ultra-nationalism and intolerance among some Magyar/Hungarian participants—as well as academic blurring of the Romanian territory of Transylvania as being “Hungarian”—remains an issue in need of direct comment and a statement of position from the Smithsonian.  In summary, the issues for direct comment by the Smithsonian’s executive team:


  • The Festival’s use of the map of the Hungarian Kingdom and Magyar Separatists representing Romanian Transylvania with Hungarian graphics and text;
  • Why the Smithsonian organizers failed to acknowledge that three of the six featured communities for the “Hungarian” Folklife festival are Romanian;
  • An explanation as to why Romanian songs, dances and costumes were featured as “Hungarian” on the stages and on the website of the Hungarian festival;
  • A statement on the Magyar/Hungarian cast members and performers exhibiting their Separatist agenda, both in interviews and in incidents of intolerance captured on video by credentialed journalists, and in response we respectfully request a clear statement of the Smithsonian’s position on these incidents;
  • An explicit acknowledgement by the Smithsonian Institute from your experts, historians, ethnographers and executive management team as to whether the region of Transylvania is legally and geo-politically part of the sovereign state of Romania, and whether any presentations, graphics, artworks or public statements suggesting otherwise are in factual error;
  • An explicit acknowledgement by the Smithsonian Institute experts and executive team including the Board of Regents that there was no intent by the Smithsonian, or the event organizers, to take a position supporting the Magyar/Hungarian Separatist movement to the detriment of the sovereign nation of Romania.


We have a team of expert historians and ethnographers ready to work with the Smithsonian Institution experts and revisit the program and determine which of the traditions presented under ”Hungarian Heritage” name may have been, in fact, Romanian in origin and artistic credit.


Sincerely, the undersigned members of the media and Romanian Diaspora


PhD. Eugen Vasilescu, Georgetown University, U.S.A.

PhD. Marius Petraru, California State University – Chief Redactor, Miorita U.S.A.

PhD. Theodore Bucur, Professor HEI of Lille, International Expert, France

PhD. Adrian Boeru, National University of Arts Bucharest, Romania

PhD. Adrian Botez, Publisher, Writers’ Union of Romania

Prof. Lia Lungu, Folklore Interpret; awarded U.S. Citizen for Extraordinary Ability, NY

Valentin Tepordei, Professor & Researcher USGS Scientist Emeritus, Arlington, VA

Mihai Boicu, Researcher, Professor, George Mason University (Fairfax, VA) U.S.A.

Daniela Ionescu,Masters in History of Art, California State University, U.S.A.

PhD Vasile Lechintan, Historian, Transylvania, Romania

Adelina Palade, Councelor and Analyst, Chamber of Deputies, Romania

Editorial Staff „Miorita USA” Romanian American Newspaper

Editorial Staff of„Ziaristi Online”, Romania

„Iuliu Maniu” Foundation, Boston, MA, U.S.A.

Marcela Maria Băjeanu –Gymnastics Coach, Maryland, U.S.A.

Ana Hontz Ward – Journalist, Voice of America, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

Dorin Suciu, Journalist, Romania

Corneliu Leu, Publisher, Canada

Dan Tanasa, Freelance Journalist, Madrid, Spain

Mihaela Biliovschi, International Journalist, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

Dacian Dumitrescu – Deputy Chef Editor, Romanian Breaking News Press

Victor Roncea, Journalist, Founding President „Civic Media” Association, Romania

Dana Deac, Vicegovernor, Cultural Society„Filarmonia” Turda, Plastic Artist & Journalist, Romania

Cultural Association„Miorita”, California, U.S.A.

Benone Neagoe, Military Journalist, Romania

Corneliu Vlad, Journalist, International Policy

Phd Grid Modorcea, Journalist and writer, New York

Eng. Simona Botezan, Deputy Manager „Miorita”, Washington, D.C.

Dan Leontescu, Editor “The Eastern European Echo”, Seattle WA, U.S.A.

Cultural Association„Miorita”, California, U.S.A.

Elena Andronache, Independent Group for Democracy, Founder, Romania

Eng. Gabriel Neagu, System Analyst, Gaithersburg, Maryland

Theodor Codreanu, Writer, Romania

Florin Palas, Journalist, Romania


Tigani Unguri Gypsy Hungarians against Romanians on Smithsonian Institute site - Ciocarlia

Romani or Gypsies - Smithsonian Institute against Romanians

Basescu si Basarabia i.e. Republica Moldova: Un sugiuc marinaresc luuungit de noua ani de zile. UPDATE: Se va spovedi Basescu, in premiera, la “Biserica” KGB?

Basescu naspa rau

Cam atat am avut de spus.

Restul tine de “masurile active” ale lui Patrusca, pardon, Patrusev. 🙂

UPDATE: Aflam de la Politica ta ca Basescu a anuntat ca se va spovedi la Chisinau, cica cand termina mandatul. Cum ambasadorul lui, sorositul Lazurca, finul teologului-jacuzzi Baconschi, al carui nas e amoralistul Plesu, se spovedeste la “Biserica” KGB a “Intregii Moldove”, rezidenta locala a “Manastirii” din Lubianka, e foarte probabil ca ii va face aceeasi recomandare si sefului sau pe linie oficiala. Va fi, oare, o premiera?

Cititi si:Raport Deschis catre Presedintele Romaniei si Directorul SRI: ICR inseamna, de fapt, Institutul Cultural Rus?

RAPORT: Dezastrul, diversiunea, teroristii si crimele din Bucuresti in timpul evenimentelor din decembrie 1989. Ce asteptau basarabenii de la vizita anulata a presedintelui Basescu. Propaganda homosexuala este interzisa in institutiile de invatamant. Scrisoare Deschisa

Grupul Trosca masacrat la ordinele KGB - GRUZiaristi Online:

RAPORT: Dezastrul, diversiunea, teroristii si crimele din Bucuresti in timpul evenimentelor din decembrie 1989. Ce ascundea Sergiu Nicolaescu sub presul “revolutiei” (IV)

Crimele-revolutiei-romani-ucisi-in-decembrie-1989-Gorbaciov-Ziaristi Online

O ştire din Moscova – Conducătorul Uniunii Sovietice Mihail Gorbaciov a întrunit azi şedinţa Congresului Deputaţilor Poporului pentru a anunţa că zeci de mii demanifestanţi se află pe străzile Bucureştiului, că în România a fost proclamată starea de urgenţă ministrul apărării naţionale s-a sinucis. Într-o tăcere totală Gorbaciov a precizat că la ora 1200 ora  Moscovei soldaţii au început să fraternizeze cu manifestanţii. Puţin înainte de a face  aceste declaraţii, Gorbaciov a părăsit Sala Congresului timp de 1/2 oră însoţit de directorul KGB Vladimir Grucikov şi de ministrul de interne Vădim Bakatin…”

Ce asteptau basarabenii de la vizita anulata a presedintelui Basescu. O noua criză în relațiile București-Chișinău?

Campania SBU anti-Romania Mare Noii golani KGB

Ambasadorul extraordinar și plenipotențiar al României la Chișinău, Marius Gabriel Lazurca, este singurul ambasador al unui stat membru UE și NATO care aparține sufletește și canonic, prin liberă alegere, unei structuri religioase conduse de la Moscova. Întrucât nu este vorba despre o persoană privată, faptul nu poate să nu ridice semne de întrebare. Presa de la Chișinău și București a scris despre complicitățile ambasadorului Lazurca cu structura locală a Patriarhiei Ruse de la Moscova și despre canalizarea către această structură a unor importante fonduri bugetare ale Statului Român, ca urmare a lobby-ului făcut de respectivul diplomat.

Propaganda homosexuala este interzisa in institutiile de invatamant. Scrisoare Deschisa pe adresa Ministerului Educatiei si a Facultatii de Sociologie din Bucuresti

Homosexualii Accept si Luna istoriei gay hai sa radem de derbedei

Totodată, Legea educaţiei naţionale prevede, la art. 7, alin. 1 că “în unităţile, în instituţiile de învăţământ şi în toate spaţiile destinate educaţiei şi formării profesionale sunt interzise activităţile care încalcă normele de moralitate şi orice activităţi care pot pune în pericol sănătatea şi integritatea fizică sau psihică a copiilor şi a tinerilor, respectiv a personalului didactic, didactic auxiliar şi nedidactic.”

Patriarhul Kirill vine la Chisinau pentru “a purta de grija” robilor sai Marius Lazurca, Petre Guran, Pavel Borsevschi, Vladimir Cantarean si, cu voia dvs, ultimul pe lista, Savatie Bastovoi

Peste numai o lună, patriarhul Moscovei şi al “intregii Rusii”, Kirill Gundeaev, urmasul generalului KGB Alexei al II-lea, care tocmai l-a gratulat pe “comandantul” comunistilor Fidel Castro de ziua lui, va efectua o vizită  “la robii sai” din Republica Moldova. In acest context, ziarul Timpul de la Chisinau a publicat astazi parerea mai multor analisti si preoti despre “vizita de lucru” a Patriarhului BORuse. Printre acestia din urma, Pavel Borsevschi, de la Mitropolia Chisinaului si a “intregii Moldove”, conduse de colonelul Vladimir Cantarean si subordonate Bisericii Ruse, cunoscut atat “gratie” laudatorului sau sef, jurnalistul in sutana Savatie Bastovoi, cat si, mai ales, prin prisma faptului ca este preotul preferat al premierului Vladimir Filat (foto stanga jos) dar si duhovnicul ambasadorului Romaniei in Republica Moldova, Marius Lazurca si al directorului ICR-Chisinau si pupil al lui Andrei Plesu (foto impreuna), Petre Guran, a carui familiei se trage de peste Prut si Nistru, si care afirma intr-un interviu din cat de bucuros este ca a descoperit “comunitatea din jurul parintelui Pavel Borsevschi”.

Ce frumos, ce inaltator…

Acum, iata, vor avea norocul sa li se poarte de grija direct de catre seful lor, al pravoslavnicilor “din jurul lui Pavel Borsevschi”, Kirill I, despre a carui vizita la Chisinau subordonatul lui Cantarean afirma:

“Vizita unui patriarh înseamnă purtare de grijă

Mitropolia Moldovei înseamnă Biserica Ortodoxă Rusă pe teritoriul Moldovei şi patriarhul trebuie să vină să vadă bisericile pe care le păstoreşte, de care el răspunde în faţa lui Dumnezeu. Eu, în calitate de preot, nu mă pot duce în faţa lui Dumnezeu, fără comunitatea mea, fără Parohia „Sfântul Dumitru” şi fără ascultarea mitropolitului Vladimir. La rândul său, mitropolitul Vladimir răspunde de mine, adică de preoţi. Pentru ca eu să-mi fac datoria cum se cuvine, el trebuie să mă ajute, să mă viziteze şi să mă ghideze. Exact acest mesaj trebuie să poarte vizita unui ierarh. Se numeşte purtare de grijă pentru mântuirea sufletelor creştinilor din R. Moldova.”

Ce frumos, ce inaltator…

Si pentru ca totul sa mearga snur, subordonatul lui Patapievici peste Prut, Petre Guran, curajosul istoric roman (?) care revolutiona lumea “intelectuala” prin afirmatii de genul “natiunea romana va fi istorie iar BOR o secta de provincie” sau cat de “stramt este romanismul in respiratia larga a culturii”, la recent incheiatul Salon international de carte de la Chisinau, directorul ICR a tinut sa lanseze personal, conform RGN Press, “volumul Cronici incomode al scriitorului Savatie Baştovoi (foto cu cei doi), în prezenţa autorului”, nepot al fostului vicepresedinte al companiei ASCOM si plamadit ca publicist de larga respiratie “moldoveneasca” in urma primului sau premiu, incasat de la… Fundatia Soros-Moldova.

Ce frumos, ce inaltator…

Geoana si Lazurca au consfintit sacrilegiile lui Voronin si Lupu de la Manastirea Curchi. Kalman Mizsei minte precum gazeta Pravda. Badescu: Diplomaţia nu se poate face în genunchi. Talpes: “Elita neascunsului”. FOTO/VIDEO Ziaristi Online

Geoana si Lazurca pe urmele lui Voronin si Lupu la Curchi
Încărcat de ZiaristiOnlineTV. – Up-to-the minute news videos.

Geoana si Lazurca au consfintit sacrilegiile lui Voronin si Lupu de la Manastirea Curchi. FOTO/VIDEO/INFO

Voronin la Curchi cu Siluan si Vladimir
Oare Geoana n-a auzit de internet, daca incultura sa doare? Dar ambasadorul Lazurca, care se presupune ca reprezinta si apara interesele Romaniei? Faptul ca nu a protestat pana acum la acest sacrilegiu, ba mai mult, se perinda in tururi pravoslavnice, brat la brat cu arhimandritul rusofil responsabil de blasfemie, vorbeste de la sine… Oare ce Departament National Antitradare ar trebui sa se autosesizeze in acest caz?

Kalman_Mizsei si Voronin

Reprezentantul special al Uniunii Europene la Chişinău, Kalman Mizsei, minte precum gazetă Pravda. El susţine cum că fostul preşedinte comunist Voronin ar fi iniţiat procesul de integrare europeană a Republicii Moldova. Nici mai mult, nici mai puţin.

Fostul sef al SIE, generalul Ioan Talpes: “Elita neascunsului”

Gen Talpes Horia Alexandrescu George Astalos

Topul personalităţilor României, care formează astăzi „noua elită” ne convinge anual de constanţa valorilor asistate din aceeaşi pungă…

Ilie Badescu: Diplomaţia nu se poate face în genunchi. Elitele si pleava subistoriei

Sarkozy Merkel UE Pictura de Francisc Chiuariu
Preşedintele Sarkozy nu este vreun preot al Consilului Europei ori al Parlamentului European, ca să împartă binecuvântări spre celelalte popoare ori să le retragă acelora după capricii ori interese proprii.

“Portretul luptatorului la tinerete”, o caricatura contestata de membri ai rezistentei din munti


Am văzut pe ecran chipul luptătorului ca fiind fumător înrăit, cu un vocabular bogat în înjurături, manifestând uşurinţă şi chiar plăcere în a-i ucide pe cei care îi căutau. Este un portret realist?

Ce a cautat Geoana la Chisinau? Misterul pelerinajului la manastirile Rusiei si atacul la Mitropolia Basarabiei. FOTO/INFO Ziaristi Online

La sfarsitul saptamanii trecute, Mircea Geoana, presedintele Senatului Romaniei, a fost la Chisinau, “intr-o vizita de lucru” de doua zile, 28 si 29 ianuarie. Pe langa acest rand, din care se deduce ca s-a intalnit cu majoritatea oficialilor din Republica de la Chisinau, nimic important nu s-a auzit despre vizita sa peste Prut. Si totusi, este vorba “al doilea om in stat” in vizita in “cel de-al doilea stat romanesc”! Ce-a cautat Geoana la Chisinau? Dincolo de faptul ca este locul in care salasluieste acum fostul sau aghiotant de campanie, Cozmin Gusa, ce il leaga pe Geoana de Basarabia, ca sa-si piarda doua zile din pretioasa sa viata? Mister total.

Daca ne uitam la aceasta vizita de complezenta constatam ca, practic, nu a ramas nimic in urma ei. Si totusi, nu-i adevarat! A ramas ceva: un botez. Un botez la care Geoana, singur-singurel (sotia avea o treaba: “a trebuit să plece în altă parte”), a nasit un finut “moldovan” in… Catedrala Mitropolitana din Chisinau. Desigur, toate bune si frumoase, mai putin faptul ca somptuoasa Catedrala in cauza apartine de facto Bisericii Ortodoxe Ruse prin filiala sa condusa de colonelul Vladimir Cantarean, Mitropolit al Chisinaului si “Intregii Moldove”. Slujba a fost tinuta de preotul Vadim Cheibaş, care e chiar secretar al Mitropoliei moscovite. Vocea mireanului de rand ne spune ca nu asta conteaza, ci sa fie pruncul sanatos. Adevarat, in ce priveste ultima parte, insa, cand vorbim de al doilea om in statul roman, noi credem ca ar trebui sa conteaze unde pune piciorul si la ce Mitropolie se inchina, mai ales cand se afla intr-o vizita oficiala, “de lucru”. In acel moment el reprezinta Romania si nu pe cetateanul Mircea Geoana de Dabuleni.

Sa zicem, totusi, ca, asta e… Cel de-al doilea om in “statul roman” a nasit in biserica ruseasca dar se va spala de pacate intr-una romanesca, vizitand, in calitatea sa de presedinte al Senatului, si Mitropolia noastra, a Basarabiei, recunoscuta dupa lungi ani de lupta ale autoritatilor romanesti cu serviciile secrete rusesti si administratiile comuniste de la Chisinau. Dupa cum amintea si presedintele Traian Basescu intr-unul dintre discursurile sale fundamentale din plenul Camerelor reunite ale Parlamentului Romaniei: „A rosti slujba în limba română şi a oficia într-o biserică aparţinând Mitropoliei Basarabiei a fost, adesea, un act de eroism, deşi libertatea religioasă trebuie respectată ca orice drept universal”. Ce credeti? S-a intalnit Geoana cu Mitropolitul Petru? As! In cele doua zile ale “vizitei de lucru”, cel de-al doilea om in stat nu a avut timp sa-l vada pe primul om al Mitropoliei Basarabiei. Implicatiile gestului sau sunt dezastroase, dupa cum vom arata aici. Gafa sau nu, mesajul transmis prin aceasta omisiune, intr-un spatiu sensibil, al confruntarilor continue, de toate tipurile, este in mod clar unul indreptat direct impotriva intereselor Romaniei. Interesant ca nici ambasadorul nostru la Chisinau nu i-a indreptat pasii spre Mitropolia Basarabiei.

In schimb, insotit de o cohorta de oficiali romani, in frunte cu ambasadorul Romaniei la Chisinau, Marius Lazurca, finul ministrului de Externe Teodor Baconschi, Mircea Geoana s-a pretat la un ciudat periplu turistico-religios, la alte doua fiefuri ale Bisericii Ortodoxe Ruse din Moldova, fostele manastiri romanesti Capriana si Curchi. La cea din urma unde a poposit, si-a facut cruci alaturi de staretul Siluan Şalaru, a aprins lumanari stantate de Patriarhia Moscovei si a lasat un emotionant mesaj in “Cartea de onoare” a salasului, asa cum veti citi mai jos.


Powered by WordPress

customizable counter
Blog din Moldova